»
Topic: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...
Replies: 14   Last Post: Oct 25, 2021, 8:21 AM by: ninetytwotiger®
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your CatCoins™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus CatCoins™!


YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
[ Tiger Boards - Clemson Football ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 14  

Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...

[2]
Oct 24, 2021, 11:58 PM
Reply

To me it's all this NIL crap and social media awareness. Our seniors use to always vote no on social.media during the year bc it was too much of a distraction. This year they allowed it bc they could make money off it posting stuff. Their image. With Dabo making remarks about how young and immature we are, it just seems like this could be part of the problem and for other programs as well. ?? I will say also that our problems on offense are not just directed at one player or position. Everything has to click as a unit to pull off a play effectively. What we lack is veteran leadership and confidence in knowing what we are going to go out and do every game. I saw DJ hit wrs , Shipley, and Galloway right in the hands and they all drop them wide open. Then when Taisun comes in they catch them. To me that's what's odd. Also what's odd is why out coached won't exploit the middle of the field more often. I mean 2 plays we called a route over the middle one to Shipley and the other to Ross and both were so open a Mack truck could fit in the hole. Yet we refuse to go there more often. What I'm saying is some of this isn't just on the players.... It's our Offensive playcalling too.

flag link

Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...


Oct 25, 2021, 12:40 AM
Reply

Parity. There are a lot of good players out there.

2021 orange level member flag link


Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...


Oct 25, 2021, 12:42 AM
Reply

Parity in the the 32 team NFL is one thing. Parity across 129 CFB teams equates to a lot a bad football.

flag link

Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...


Oct 25, 2021, 7:31 AM
Reply

Parity ...the communism of football.

So we now tell a great football player that had planned to attend a certain school all his life that nope, you have to attend Marshall or Georgia Southern instead if you want to be a football player?

Whether people like it or not college football is still an amateur sport.

flag link

Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...

[2]
Oct 25, 2021, 12:44 AM
Reply

The NIL is a non factor. That's ludicrous. Bama and Georgia are doing great. The NIL? You have to be kidding.

flag link

Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...

[1]
Oct 25, 2021, 2:22 AM
Reply

Are we too take you post seriously? First off this is only your 1138 post in 7 years, and then your topic heading says and other big name schools...yet you either failed to mention what other big name schools you think are not looking good, or your just trying to convince us that you are just another armchair quarterback who thinks he knows what is going on in one certain locker room?
Sorry ,you didn't convince me.


















9

flag link

Generally speaking, the landscape of College Football,

[1]
Oct 25, 2021, 4:54 AM
Reply

is so much different this year because of Super Seniors- 6 year players. I think that has a lot to do with it.

flag link


Re: Generally speaking, the landscape of College Football,


Oct 25, 2021, 6:06 AM
Reply

Hmmm? You might be on to something there. Take a team like Pitt or Wake. I would love to know how many “old seniors” they have on the roster. I don’t know the answer but I’m curious.

flag link

Re: Generally speaking, the landscape of College Football,

[1]
Oct 25, 2021, 6:27 AM
Reply

Pitt had 13 “Super Seniors” in their starting lineup per the broadcast Saturday.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Re: Generally speaking, the landscape of College Football,


Oct 25, 2021, 6:52 AM
Reply

Well that can make a difference.

flag link

Re: Generally speaking, the landscape of College Football,


Oct 25, 2021, 6:56 AM
Reply

PITT oline had 4 5th yr Sr and 1 Jr. Experience took over . They blocked well all game. The extra yr has helped some schools. It has hurt others. Go Tigers

military_donation.jpg flag link

Super Seniors***


Oct 25, 2021, 7:13 AM
Reply



flag link

Re: Clemson and other big name name schools not looking good. So what's changed this year...


Oct 25, 2021, 7:37 AM
Reply

Covid

flag link

Transfer Portal.


Oct 25, 2021, 8:18 AM
Reply

Now the teams who are normally just happy to be top 25 also have some players form the elite teams that weren't getting enough playing time. Now those teams are better able to compete with the top teams.

flag link

Six year super seniors for some programs


Oct 25, 2021, 8:20 AM
Reply

They’re men.

They’re thirty!


Shout out to Mike G.

2021 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link

Replies: 14  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: ACC Championship
FOR SALE: Eight (8) tickets in Section 517, Row 21. Will sell all or any for $45/ticket OBO...text or call 704...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Tiger Boards - Clemson Football ]
Start New Topic
1699 people have read this post