GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNETs™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus TNETs™!

Love it!
monetization_on 100
Quality Content
monetization_on 0
Big Fish
monetization_on 250
Is it safe?
monetization_on 75
Flammable
monetization_on 200
Caring
monetization_on 200
Nom Nom Nom
monetization_on 250
Ooo, Shiny!
monetization_on 700
Hear ye, hear ye
monetization_on 200
Cheers
monetization_on 100
Bravo
monetization_on 250
Thumbs Up
monetization_on 0
Take My Coins
monetization_on 500
Great Idea!
monetization_on 150
Thumbs Down
monetization_on 10

YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
After further review
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
Replies: 2  

After further review

[4]
Sep 25, 2022, 9:23 PM

The coverage on some of the TD passes Hartman threw was actually pretty good. We weren't looking for the ball, which is a big part of the process and technique, but those guys were right there. Some very good throws and very good catches; credit due to them.

However, there were several other throws where we just go burned, no two ways about it.

Overall, not as bad after seeing it again. It often isn't.

flag link

Re: After further review. . . . agree! Give'em credit!

[3]
Sep 25, 2022, 9:31 PM

Some of the posters on TNET think because the patch on the opossing teams jersey doesn't read Big or SEC Clemson is supposed to dominate by 35 pts or more each time or we aren't playing well.
I agree with you. The coverage was there; they just were on it. Wake was ready and came out and played probably above their heads a little bit. Or maybe they didn't because Wake is an experienced unit with the most experienced OL in CFB so Hartman had time to set his feet.

Give Wake credit and let's not act like the DB's were completely out of the picture. If we had a bunch of blown coverages it would be different. But, on many of those it was man coverage. We have 4 and 5 star DB's against more experienced but initially ranked 3-star WR's. Should have been a closer match instead because of a hot QB and solid OL the passes were pinpoint accurate and the young db's coverage wasn't good enough.

We'll be better because of what Wake did to the young secondary later on. Thanks Wake that will propel us forward!

2022 white level member flag link

Re: After further review. . . . agree! Give'em credit!

[2]
Sep 25, 2022, 10:06 PM

I agree. Several TD catches were well covered. It was just a perfectly thrown pass.

2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link


Replies: 2  
Tiger Boards - Clemson Football
add New Topic
1022 people have read this post