Replies: 34
| visibility 1
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Who can testify under oath to refute the testimony so far?
Jun 29, 2022, 10:05 AM
|
|
Wouldn't that be the simplest solution to the concerns of those on the extreme right who refuse to believe their lying eyes?
After the testimony yesterday, it's obvious that Mark Meadows should be the first to step up to the plate. Many more who refuse to cooperate to set the record straight.
https://twitter.com/realJodyHunt/status/1541924119159218176
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: Who can testify under oath to refute the testimony so far?
Jun 29, 2022, 10:07 AM
|
|
that was not allowed, because it is a sham
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
If you had info that would refute all of the witness'
Jun 29, 2022, 10:10 AM
|
|
testimony, why would you not cooperate and provide the information and testify under oath?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: If you had info that would refute all of the witness'
Jun 29, 2022, 10:11 AM
|
|
it is not up to Rs to defend this garbage
time to go on offense
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9385
Joined: 12/18/13
|
#### yeah, Hunter Biden laptop time!***
Jun 29, 2022, 10:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: #### yeah, Hunter Biden laptop time!***
Jun 29, 2022, 10:15 AM
|
|
nope
but at least that is real
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Why did Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, John Eastman, Alex Jones
Jun 29, 2022, 10:20 AM
[ in reply to Re: If you had info that would refute all of the witness' ] |
|
and Jeffrey Clark take the 5th when given the opportunity to set the record straight?
Why did Ginni Thomas's lawyer release a letter yesterday, after the hearing and the public disclosure of the seizure of John Eastman's phone, suggesting that she was no longer eager to testify under oath?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: Why did Michael Flynn, Roger Stone, John Eastman, Alex Jones
Jun 29, 2022, 10:21 AM
|
|
you cant talk to the police as they will try to trap you
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5640]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12112
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Re: Is there another possibility?
Jun 30, 2022, 9:36 AM
|
|
Why did you believe the Russian Collusion hoax? How sure were you that was true?
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [43985]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 32915
Joined: 2/22/03
|
What a convenient little scenario you’ve manufactured for yourself!
Jun 29, 2022, 11:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: Who can testify under oath to refute the testimony so far? ] |
|
All of these people know the truth, but won’t testify under oath because this hearing is a sham and they don’t want to be falsely accused of something.
And of course, in your little scenario all of the people who have testified are lying!
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5640]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 12112
Joined: 9/28/08
|
Re: What a convenient little scenario you’ve manufactured for yourself!
Jun 30, 2022, 9:38 AM
|
|
You act like "all of the people lying" is not possible. Of course it is and how many times have the democrats, MSM, and social media fabricated and spread lies. Over and over and over.
No one on the left, no one, has any cred whatsoever. [nose scratch] NO ONE has any cred. NO ONE [whisper]
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9385
Joined: 12/18/13
|
More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 10:11 AM
|
|
where are the people willing to testify that Trump didn't want armed people at his big lie rally? Is there anyone refuting that he wanted violence at the Capitol? Why aren't Mark Meadows and Pat Cippollone getting in front of cameras?
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 10:14 AM
|
|
because it would be a waste of time
Ds will just throw up something new to keep the Rs on defense instead of talking about real issues
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7178]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9385
Joined: 12/18/13
|
####### democracy isn't a real issue apparently.***
Jun 29, 2022, 10:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: ####### democracy isn't a real issue apparently.***
Jun 29, 2022, 10:17 AM
|
|
show trial, most everyone can see through it
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3994]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8009
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 10:19 AM
[ in reply to Re: More importantly ] |
|
The BS excuses are hilarious. It's amazing the lengths you will go to PROTECT DADDY. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8885]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9759
Joined: 4/27/13
|
Re: More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 10:20 AM
|
|
i am sorry folks didnt bite on your show trial
frustrating aint it lol
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3994]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8009
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 10:27 AM
|
|
So has everybody that has testified been lying under oath, while DADDY is doing everything he can to shield him and his people from talking?
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82964]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80109
Joined: 11/29/99
|
Seems the Rs on that committee are in
Jun 29, 2022, 10:25 AM
[ in reply to Re: More importantly ] |
|
lock-step with the Ds.
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [137735]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63735
Joined: 10/22/00
|
You're either MAGA, or you're a RINO.
Jun 29, 2022, 10:33 AM
|
|
And it no longer has ANYTHING to do with actual conservative principles. "Do you worship or fear Donald Trump?" If you answered no, you're a RINO.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58357]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46303
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Because they hate Trump just as much as the Ds.
Jun 29, 2022, 4:30 PM
[ in reply to Seems the Rs on that committee are in ] |
|
The fact that they are "R"s in no way implies bipartisanship. Trump has publicly, personally insulted both of them on more than one ocassion, aside from having political differences. They are not on the same team as Trump at all; they are bitter enemies, that's why they are on the hit squad.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3994]
TigerPulse: 68%
Posts: 8009
Joined: 12/9/01
|
Re: Because they hate Trump just as much as the Ds.
Jun 29, 2022, 5:46 PM
|
|
Before or after he summoned and inspired the insurrection and tried to unconstitutionally overturn a democratic election?
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58357]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46303
Joined: 4/23/00
|
It doesn't matter. They were very public enemies of Trump
Jun 29, 2022, 6:36 PM
|
|
when they were selected for the committee. There has not even been a pretense of non-partisanship or objectivity. This is not a trial. This is the police, who already had reached full conclusions and their minds made up before they started. The investigation was geared to prove those conclusions, by a prosecution team consisting entirely of totally biased people who hate the suspect. That's all. Thankfully (hopefully), we demand and expect better from our actual criminal justice system. Hopefully we will get it if they decide to prosecute.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12981]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14001
Joined: 11/2/15
|
Re: More importantly
Jun 29, 2022, 4:33 PM
[ in reply to More importantly ] |
|
Trump is nuts. Imagine of those 20k armed military that he authorized showed up.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 41374
Joined: 4/20/01
|
No one cares***
Jun 29, 2022, 11:05 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
The board is filling up fast with posts from people who
Jun 29, 2022, 11:12 AM
|
|
don't care. A flurry of activity since the Hearing yesterday that "nobody" is watching.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34089]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33592
Joined: 9/13/99
|
LMAO***
Jun 29, 2022, 11:19 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20518]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11667
Joined: 10/15/02
|
Re: No one cares***
Jun 29, 2022, 11:22 AM
[ in reply to No one cares*** ] |
|
Lots and lots of people care.
We also don't care that you don't care.
See? We can agree on stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10863]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15034
Joined: 8/6/10
|
Several people. But this is a show-trial, not a real trial
Jun 29, 2022, 11:09 AM
|
|
and so they won't be called and nobody will be cross-examined, as in a legitimate trial.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22381]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 31278
Joined: 11/30/98
|
You keep referring to Congress conducting a "trial."***
Jun 29, 2022, 11:13 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10793]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7906
Joined: 10/18/16
|
Re: Who can testify under oath to refute the testimony so far?
Jun 30, 2022, 8:46 AM
|
|
Both Secret Service Agents (the driver and security) have been questioned by the J6 Committee. I'm really surprised Cheney and Pelosi didn't read their testimony to collaborate Hutchinson's testimony. If you care demand the Secret Service testify on TV in front of the people who have been douped by this useless B.S. How many sick and hungry people could have been helped by the money wasted by this Committee?
I guess when a party has no platform, no plan and no chance, they waste time and money rather than helping the people they serve.
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [34089]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33592
Joined: 9/13/99
|
Re: Who can testify under oath to refute the testimony so far?
Jun 30, 2022, 9:01 AM
|
|
I'm really surprised Cheney and Pelosi didn't read their testimony to collaborate Hutchinson's testimony.
This is a hunch, but I bet that the driver and Mr. Engle have so far said nothing under oath that contradicts Ms. Hutchinson's account. Perhaps they said they didn't recall? We'll find out at some point.
Perhaps the Chair of the committee had them (among many others) in mind when he said this:
BENNIE THOMPSON: Ms. Hutchinson, thank you. Thank you for doing your patriotic duty in helping the American people get a complete understanding of January 6 and its causes. Thank you for your courage in testifying here today. You have the gratitude of this committee and your country. I know it wasn't easy to sit here today and answer these questions.
But after hearing your testimony and all its candor and detail, I want to speak directly to the handful of witnesses who have been outliers in our investigation, the small number who have defied us outright, those whose memories have failed them again and again on the most important details, and to those who fear Donald Trump and his enablers. Because of this courageous woman and others like her, your attempt to hide the truth from the American people will fail.
And to that group of witnesses, if you've heard this testimony today and suddenly you remember things you couldn't previously recall or there are some details you'd like to clarify or you discovered some courage you had hidden away somewhere, our doors remain open. The select committee will reconvene in the weeks ahead as we continue to lay out our findings to the American people.
https://news.yahoo.com/jan-6-committee-chair-says-192027578.html
|
|
|
|
Replies: 34
| visibility 1
|
|
|