Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 12
| visibility 2,273

Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .


Nov 3, 2013, 5:24 PM

First, what a great win yesterday. I know UVA is a pretty crappy team, but instead of playing flat and giving poor effort, we did exactly what we should have done; we played with good intensity and put a severe beatdown on our opponent. Nice job.

Looking forward, we will miss Tajh Boyd next year. You don't lose a player of his caliber without feeling it. However, I feel really good about our QB situation going forward. I think with 3 full years in the system, Stoudt will be ready to go as our starter come next fall. All the PT he has gotten should give him plenty of confidence. Seeing him play again yesterday only reinforced that. Chad Kelly will give him a fight, and he looks better every time he plays. He sure looked good in mop-up duty yesterday. I don't know if it will be a full-fledged 2 QB system, but I can envision both of them getting plenty of PT next season. I'm sure the plan will be to redshirt Deshaun Watson, but I could easily see him playing next year if needed due to injury to one of the others - he looks like he is going to be a good one. QB is in good shape going forward.

Just as we will miss Tajh, we will miss Sammy Watkins as well. I don't see any one guy that can replace him, but we do have a lot of talent there coming back, and some pretty highly regarded guys coming in. Bryant made some nice catches yesterday, as did Williams and Hopper. With them and Peake and Humphries coming back, along with the freshmen, we should be in very good shape there as well.

Jordan Leggett looks like a giant WR; his talent is obvious. If he gets it all together, he will be another stud in a long line of studs at TE for Clemson. He had some nice catches yesterday as well.

On defense, Jayron Kearse is a player and contiues to impress. He has good instincts and his physical qualities are freakish. He looked like a veteran again yesterday. Wiggins has a nose for the ball as well, and has really surprised me with his play. Very aggressive, and also doesn't look like a freshman. We still need a few more quality DBs; can't wait to see Alexander back there next year.

I sure there are other young'uns that played well yesterday that I am overlooking, but those stood out to me. Sure, somebody will have to emerge at RB next year, the O-line needs to keep improving, and there will be a few holes on defense, but the point is, I saw a lot yesterday to keep me fired up about the future of Clemson football. Now let's win out this year, beat the coots and win a BCS Bowl!

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


You got THAT right!!***


Nov 3, 2013, 5:28 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

IMO, it will be Kelly as starter


Nov 3, 2013, 5:28 PM

in first game next year. Why? Because he fits the Chad's system much better than Stoudt. Your are right, it will be an interesting battle in Spring practice with Watson there as well!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: IMO, it will be Kelly as starter- the interesting thing


Nov 3, 2013, 5:33 PM

is Watson. If he comes in Jan it gives him the max opportunity to learn the O and not redshirt. this is not to say he willstart as I think Stoudt will be starting initially but for a young qb it gives them the max chance to develop the first year.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgringofhonor-74tiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like Kelly a bunch. I would like to see him go deep a few


Nov 3, 2013, 6:34 PM

times, and that would solidify his position in my mine. Of course Dabo and Chad won't be calling for my opinion LOL.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .


Nov 3, 2013, 5:50 PM

I've said it once, I'll say it again, Kelly will never see the field as a starter unless Stoudt of Watson gets hurt.

I think Stoudt will end up starting next and I'll go out on a limb and make a few predictions. He'll be a candidate for Heisman at some point in the season and he'll go in the first two rounds of the draft.

Stoudt is really a diamond in the rough. He's a really smart kid, makes good decisions, has good accuracy and the ball really flies off his arm. Not to mention that he has the type of size that the NFL loves and he's a lot faster than people give him credit for. I highly doubt we see any dip in production from the QB position next year if Stoudt is the starter.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .


Nov 3, 2013, 6:16 PM

Chad Kelly will transfer to a team where he can play.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .


Nov 3, 2013, 6:16 PM [ in reply to Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . . ]

I do not think Stoudt will start over Kelly. Stoudt is a really good backup, but thats all.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't think Stoudt..........


Nov 3, 2013, 6:24 PM [ in reply to Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . . ]

is elusive enough, quick enough and generally a good enough runner to maximize the potential of this offense, IMHO. I see Watson as the perfect QB for our system. Now whether or not he can beat out the other two his freshman year remains to be seen. But he is our future.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yesterday's game and the future of Clemson football . . .


Nov 3, 2013, 7:20 PM

Smiling Tiger,I could really get behind a 2QB system.
Our opponent's DC would have to prepare for 2 different
QBs. Throw in some Wildcat with T. Dye and W.Gallman plus
the limited amount of practice time per week could only help
us.I hope that M.Bryant and V.Bleasley will come back next
year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Speaking of Beasley...


Nov 3, 2013, 9:54 PM

..one of the announcers yesterday (Cunningham, I think) commented that Beasley would improve his NFL stock considerably if he does come back. Hope Vic listens to him.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Exactly...keep winning, beat the Cooters & win that Bowl ***


Nov 3, 2013, 10:38 PM

GoTiGs!

badge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonorlightbulbbill.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Stoudt's wheels are pretty good, but i saw again yesterday


Nov 3, 2013, 10:42 PM

the one thing that has always worried me about Stoudt and that's his arm strength. He has an odd release and doesn't get a lot of zip on the ball. His throws float a bit out of his hand, and on throws 20+ yards down the field the trajectory and the lack of velocity are very noticeable.

He's more accurate than Tajh, i think he's very good mentally, and he runs surprisingly well, but he can't make all of the throws and that's a pretty big negative.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 12
| visibility 2,273
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic