|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
The scariest part about the committee ranking ole miss #4
Oct 29, 2014, 9:19 AM
|
|
They had to have had them ranked #1 or #2 going into the weekend...
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
None of this matters til all games are done. The SEC West
Oct 29, 2014, 9:20 AM
|
|
teams will eliminate themselves down to 1 or 2 for the playoff.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
The problem is if they try to include 2 loss Bama or Auburn.***
Oct 29, 2014, 9:21 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
A big indicator will be how far they drop Ole Miss/Auburn
Oct 29, 2014, 9:24 AM
|
|
next week. The loser of that game will certainly be the highest-ranked 2-loss team. But how far will they fall? Below Oregon, certainly. Below Michigan St.? How about TCU and KSU?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [665]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 665
Joined: 9/14/03
|
I'm willing to bet a lot that they fall behind UGA. 2 losses
Oct 29, 2014, 9:34 AM
|
|
at THIS point in the season knocks you out of the top 10...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [665]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 665
Joined: 9/14/03
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [665]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 665
Joined: 9/14/03
|
Yes, I still trust them. Ole Miss is only slightly overrated***
Oct 29, 2014, 9:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
They didn't have anyone ranked.
Oct 29, 2014, 9:21 AM
|
|
This was their first ranking.
They didn't even meet for the first time until Monday.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
I think the point is Ole Miss would have been 1-3 w/win.***
Oct 29, 2014, 9:23 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [56606]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 39601
Joined: 11/12/04
|
Prodigal: "who would you put ahead of them if they won??"***
Oct 29, 2014, 9:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
I agree. Just clarifying. What I found suprising is the
Oct 29, 2014, 9:26 AM
|
|
comments on ESPN that there was suprise at Bama not being ahead of them. Crazy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4640]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 9549
Joined: 11/4/01
|
I also got sick of hearing about K St being a quality win.
Oct 29, 2014, 9:27 AM
|
|
But I guess the had to tout it...it is the only quality win for SEC outside of conference except UGA over Clemson.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5513]
TigerPulse: 73%
Posts: 6991
Joined: 4/6/10
|
So you dont think the committee members had an idea
Oct 29, 2014, 9:24 AM
[ in reply to They didn't have anyone ranked. ] |
|
Of their Top 25 for a few weeks now? Come on now. Just bc it wasnt public doesnt mean it wasnt there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13031]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22351
Joined: 4/24/04
|
Which is fine. I don't really understand the outrage.
Oct 29, 2014, 9:24 AM
|
|
Make a good argument for Oregon, TCU, or Michigan St to be ahead of them instead of just saying how ridiculous it is.
IMO Oregon has the best case atm with the win over Michigan St, but i think Bama is a slightly better win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [665]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 665
Joined: 9/14/03
|
I agree. I might have put Oregon at #4.Unless they get upset
Oct 29, 2014, 9:38 AM
|
|
they'll end up there anyway, which goes back to the point that it is premature to get upset this early in the process. The remaining schedule will work out a lot of the controversy. An 8 team playoff would eliminate a lot more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1694]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2357
Joined: 2/16/05
|
Re: Which is fine. I don't really understand the outrage.
Oct 29, 2014, 10:51 AM
[ in reply to Which is fine. I don't really understand the outrage. ] |
|
But they lost to LSU, which at the time had fallen out of favor being they were only #24. So should they now consider LSU such a quality team that for Ole Miss it is such a great quality loss that there is NO drop in position??? I don't buy it because even after LSU won, they only moved up to #19. #24 beating #4 only moves them up 5, but #4 losing to #24 doesn't drop them AT ALL??? There is no logic in that, only bias...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
My personal top four....
Oct 29, 2014, 9:27 AM
|
|
would be Mississippi State, FSU, Bama, and Oregon.
My next two would be TCU and Notre Dame.
Having an Ole Miss team that just lost in the top four ahead of Alabama or Oregon is a bit puzzling IMO.
Of course, that's just me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: My personal top four....
Oct 29, 2014, 9:50 AM
|
|
so you would rank Alabama ahead of a team that beat them? head to head means nothing? is that tnet logic?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
It's the "what have you done lately" mentality***
Oct 29, 2014, 9:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2457]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 4246
Joined: 3/12/08
|
You would be livid
Oct 29, 2014, 9:42 AM
|
|
If a 1 loss Clemson team, who beat FSU (and lost to say Louisville), was ranked below a 1 loss FSU. The committee is high on Bama and Auburn so they have to be high on Ole Miss. Bama or Auburn will miss the playoffs with 2 losses. Ole Miss will lose again, probably this week (or knock Auburn out of the playoffs). Miss St will pick up a loss soon. The SEC will only get 2 teams max so this is all irrelevant. But anyways, if Bama and Auburn are top 6, then Ole Miss has to be top 6 and ahead of Bama due to them having the same record and Ole Miss having the head-to-head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 21
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
