|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
Legend [19586]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17257
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Anyone have any theories as to why Artavis Scott is not
Sep 23, 2014, 2:27 PM
|
|
getting more PT and looks?
He had a fabulous catch and run to start the game and then was on the sideline for the majority. Any reason why a talent like him is not running jet sweeps, screens, or returning kicks?
Makes no sense to me. He seems to be are most obvious answer to attempt replacing sammy.
|
|
|
|
 |
Oculus Spirit [83625]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 63724
Joined: 12/31/06
|
Paul Johnson doesn't use a lot of receivers***
Sep 23, 2014, 2:27 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12030]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 12668
Joined: 7/14/05
|
Artavis Scott never ran jet sweeps or screens in high school
Sep 23, 2014, 2:29 PM
|
|
HTH
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19610]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16899
Joined: 9/5/02
|
He's just not comfortable with them.
Sep 23, 2014, 2:45 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17786]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13387
Joined: 9/16/03
|
We are GOING to run the ball up the middle, even if we lose***
Sep 23, 2014, 2:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
the obvious answer you are looking for in every question
Sep 23, 2014, 2:32 PM
|
|
is to bash the staff and playcalling...
but to your question, I think Sat. it had to do with his PF penalty
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19586]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17257
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: the obvious answer you are looking for in every question
Sep 23, 2014, 2:33 PM
|
|
In every question you answer seems to be an excuse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
you can't be serious... I asked you to point out bad play
Sep 23, 2014, 2:34 PM
|
|
calling.... and 2 of your three were
- a long first down run
- a snap over the QBs head
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19586]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17257
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: you can't be serious... I asked you to point out bad play
Sep 23, 2014, 2:42 PM
|
|
When did I say the snap over the qbs head? I specifically said the play after. Quit twisting arguments.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30593]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 28685
Joined: 8/17/05
|
ok... so that's even worse... your argument is
Sep 23, 2014, 2:44 PM
|
|
it's 3rd and 25+ against FSU's defense. We (think) we are in FG range. Our D is playing lights out.
And you would throw it in the EZ with our freshmen QB, rather than try to get some back and kick the FG?
w t h?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11161]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10900
Joined: 9/17/07
|
How do you know the excuse isn't the answer?
Sep 23, 2014, 2:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: the obvious answer you are looking for in every question ] |
|
Unless, you already have the preconceived/desired answer formulated in your mind and just want someone else to validate it?
Seems like you're wasting your own time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19586]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 17257
Joined: 7/25/07
|
Re: How do you know the excuse isn't the answer?
Sep 23, 2014, 2:43 PM
|
|
Ok so tell me another instance where a really good player wasn't utilized in a big game because of a PF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [427]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 482
Joined: 9/18/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9432
Joined: 12/18/13
|
Re: Anyone have any theories as to why Artavis Scott is not
Sep 23, 2014, 2:47 PM
|
|
For all his positives there are still things he needs to work on to take snaps away from the other receivers. Blocking is probably the biggest concern with a freshman receiver followed by knowledge of the play book.
He still got 26 snaps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7482]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15413
Joined: 2/2/01
|
my guess is blocking-- it's what receivers have to do 80%
Sep 23, 2014, 3:03 PM
|
|
of the time-- they are only targets about 20%
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2285
Joined: 2/3/06
|
Re: Anyone have any theories as to why Artavis Scott is not
Sep 23, 2014, 3:00 PM
|
|
There was the double penalty for unsportsman-like conduct where a WR and DB were "swinging at each other" according to the announcers and it resulted in the replay of a down. I want to say it was Scott that was the WR blocking during the play (Maybe it was Kitt?). The coaches may have let him sit on the bench some as a teaching moment. I have slept since Saturday night, so all of this could be inaccurate and I made it all up in my head.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16250]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12783
Joined: 11/14/09
|
That's actually what I was thinking about as well. We saw a
Sep 23, 2014, 3:14 PM
|
|
lot less Tay after that incident.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3788]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 9880
Joined: 11/2/08
|
Because Humpries has "Paid his dues" just like Stoudt.***
Sep 23, 2014, 3:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 17
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
