Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 64
| visibility 1

Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:43 PM

A. Clayton was just bumped up to 5*. He had serious interest in Clemson and there was a better than good chance that he would have eventually signed with us. Dodd's pro intentions were not yet known and the staff had determined early that they were only taking 1 DE this year. In no uncertain terms they told X. Kelly and Clayton that they'd take the 1st guy that committed and would shut down their DE recruitment after that. Clayton wanted to spend a little more time seeing what else was out there, but Kelly didn't hesitate and committed. Clayton was dominant at the UA game and in practices and earned the 5th star and eventually choice Florida

Clayton may have a more immediate impact, but Kelly has more physical tools and upside to eventually be the better player. Basically we turned away a 5* due to numbers. It's crazy to me that our program is at a point where a typical 5* is not oversign worthy. Apparently, you've got to be a 5* and top 5-10 overall in the entire class for us to squeeze you in.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:45 PM

Rather have the coaches sons

5'7 DBs and slow LBs don't grow on trees lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Give this up


Jan 19, 2016, 8:50 PM

How many games have we lost because of Dabo's recruiting of legacies?


Go to STS or FGF if you ain't with Dabo and recruiting, you can spout your whining over there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Give this up


Jan 19, 2016, 10:34 PM

What a great way to think! Don't question stuff or think about stuff...if you don't agree with everything our coaches do, get out!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do you think everyone here is stupid?


Jan 20, 2016, 8:27 AM

The ridicule of Dabo was the issue. You made it out as if those who question coaching should be thrown off the board. That's not what happened and you know it. A poster ridiculed our HC after Clemson's first 14 win season. That's not bright.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Do you think everyone here is stupid?


Jan 20, 2016, 1:01 PM

Someone questioned the strategy of giving scholarships to legacies & sons of coaches, and the exact response was "Go to STS or FGF if you ain't with Dabo and recruiting"

I'm not making it out to be anything...I'm just responding to what another poster said. I think it's foolish to shut people down just for bringing up a subject like that, especially when there's a limited number of scholarships. We've given out multiple scholarships to guys who have 0 other Division 1 offers, and whose parents are more than able to afford tuition. It's worth talking about IMO.

FWIW, I don't have a problem with those guys being on the team, but I believe they should be preferred walk-ons.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 8:51 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

It doesn't sound like it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm good enough, I'm smart enough, and doggone it, people like me.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 8:59 PM

Why because I don't agree with one thing Dabo does ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:01 PM

Because you're trashing our players.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:10 PM

Sorry how is saying how talk Trapp and Dawkins are trashing them ? This is the correct height right ? Do you know how many 5'7 CBs play in the NFL ? I'll answer for you NONE . Pointing the obvious isn't trashing them it's the truth . You know what they say "It is not slander or defamation if it is true"

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:16 PM

Well you pretty much inferred that they didn't deserve a scholly before they haven't even played a game, but I suppose you know better than coaches that have put 2 star recruits into the NFL.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:19 PM

If you think they are so good and deserve the scholarship then surely you would bet that at least 1 out of the 5 will make it into the NFL ? If not then pipe down.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:28 PM

Since when is making it to the NFL a criteria for the meaning a scholarship? Were Spencer Sheuy, Darius Robinson, Rod McDowell, Gary Peters and Josh Watson wasted scholarships? By your theory yes because 1 of the 5 didn't get into the NFL, but keep on passing judgement on players that have not even set foot on a college football field.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:35 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So you have no logical response


Jan 19, 2016, 9:40 PM

Nice to know I won the argument.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:39 PM [ in reply to Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"? ]

The Davis Twins and trapp are on campus keep up . The Davis Twins played great on our weakest link the kickoff team this year .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:44 PM

all are freshmen I'm sure the and last time I checked there were 9 other people on KO team. Pretty sure Trapp redshirted.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:47 PM

"keep on passing judgement on players that have not even set foot on a college football field"

"all are freshmen I'm sure the and last time I checked there were 9 other people on KO team. Pretty sure Trapp redshirted"

I thought they haven't set foot on a college football field ? I think we have 11 on the KO team but maybe we are playing with 9 after seeing all of the returns we gave up this year .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 10:27 PM

Have Dawkins and Trapp played a down of College Football yet? No...so you are still passing judgement on players that haven't played yet. You are completely foolish if you really think our coaches put the don't put 11 best players on the KO team because of their last name.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 10:32 PM

No...so you are still passing judgement on players that haven't played yet



"You are completely foolish if you really think our coaches put the don't put 11 best players on the KO team because of their last name"

You don't remember Daniel Rodriguez on punt return ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 10:46 PM

Ironic you would use that gif to justify your feelings considering you believe they got the offers due to nepotism.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 10:51 PM

"you believe they got the offers due to nepotism"

Nobody can deny this

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 10:56 PM [ in reply to Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

which CB's are 5' 7"?...


Jan 19, 2016, 9:55 PM [ in reply to Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"? ]

and FYI. there are several cb's in the nfl right now who are short

Mark McMillian from Alabama, played for Eagles was 5' 7".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: which CB's are 5' 7"?...


Jan 19, 2016, 9:58 PM

Trapp & Dawkins and sorry we are talking about 2016 not 1997 LMAO

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: which CB's are 5' 7"?...


Jan 19, 2016, 10:57 PM

as I said, there are 2 in the nfl NOW.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: which CB's are 5' 7"?...


Jan 19, 2016, 10:58 PM

Well don't hold this valuable information please tell .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: which CB's are 5' 7"?...


Jan 20, 2016, 1:05 PM [ in reply to Re: which CB's are 5' 7"?... ]

"as I said, there are 2 in the nfl NOW"

We are waiting

@cutiger250

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:37 PM [ in reply to Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"? ]

You don't agree with one thing Dabo does ?
Not one ?
Man . Care to take is on a trip through the mind of a " fan " who completely disagrees with everything their successful head football coach is doing ?
Insightful comments are anticipated .

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

DB23


Re: Are you really #ALLIN "All in 52"?


Jan 19, 2016, 9:43 PM

The one thing I disagree with is putting walk-on type players on scholarship just because of the last name on the jersey . Other than that no problems with Dabo .

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:52 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

You ever think that offering coach v son might keep him at Clemson four more years?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:53 PM

BVs son is fine he has D1 offers unlike the others

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:00 PM

In that case, I'll watch and learn... Proceed

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:54 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

Venables' son isn't an issue whatsoever - future 4* player. It's the Davis twins, Trapp, and Dawkins that are issues, specifically.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

and you...


Jan 19, 2016, 8:55 PM

do not even realize why they do it?? SMH

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: and you...


Jan 19, 2016, 9:14 PM

Actually, I'm well aware of why they did it. That doesn't mean I have to completely agree with it.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't think the coaches are looking for your approval.***


Jan 19, 2016, 9:30 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:02 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

Go ahead say it...you've been dying to say it Fire Dabo....you miss those days don't you?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:19 PM

I'd recommend you check my posting history - I'm a big Dabo fan and have been tremendously pleased with the program's success and direction. Again, we have a limited number of scholarships and I'd rather not have several used for limited players. If we were like Alabama and "cut" players by putting them on medical hardship for little reason (a strategy I'd prefer we never pursue), then this probably wouldn't be an issue. But when we are lacking depth and short on numbers at key positions while we're losing freshman All-Americans (ie Kareem Orr), it seems to me that we are hurting ourselves.

Hth

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:39 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

While we're naming names, add Nick Schuessler (roomate's player) & D.J. Greenlee (S&C staff member's son). Dabo is very free-hearted with other people's money. It does not appear that he will discontinue the practice so it's useless to debate it.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Have you considered that the family atmosphere that


Jan 19, 2016, 9:01 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

apparently goes a long way in selling the program to most of those 5* recruits is cultivated by doing things like giving scholarships to "short" and "slow" legacy recruits?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Have you considered that the family atmosphere that


Jan 19, 2016, 9:15 PM

With this logic we should never fire Danny Danny Pearman because he is a former player and that helps show the family atmosphere.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Have you considered that the family atmosphere that


Jan 19, 2016, 9:17 PM

How many All ACC TEs has he coached?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Brad Brownell: more losses than any other coach in school history.


Re: Have you considered that the family atmosphere that


Jan 19, 2016, 9:25 PM [ in reply to Re: Have you considered that the family atmosphere that ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Need to change your user name. Definitely not All In.


Jan 19, 2016, 9:05 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

Maybe Partially In would fit or better yet All Jerk.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:35 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

Don't just cry and whine about that. Dabo signed a 5 star that has been suspended twice. Maybe we should fire him. The Davis Twins and Brian Hawkins son haven't cost us a game. Deon on the other might have. Get over bashing the sons of former Tigers.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:06 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

You've made your opinion very clear....many times. Your upset with our number of legacies, recruiting decisions and feel more capable of running our program than Dabo.
Thanks and congratulations on your persistence. :)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:09 PM

You're.... not "your" which I somehow posted! I thought I better fix it before I draw the attention of the grammar police. Not that there's anything wrong with being a grammar cop. :)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:15 PM

Your Crazy !!!! lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:18 PM

"Your Crazy !!!! lol "



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:12 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]

Yep you have this thing all figured out lol is that you Barney Fife ?



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 10:26 PM

Is that you Otis? Just trying to "nip it in the bud" as Barney liked to say. Unfortunately, probably a little late with the nipping! Lol

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The irony of your ignorance....***


Jan 19, 2016, 11:02 PM [ in reply to Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: The irony of your ignorance....***


Jan 19, 2016, 11:08 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: The irony of your ignorance....***


Jan 19, 2016, 11:19 PM

Downvote me all you want ladies



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:51 PM

I posted on this earlier today. I wish we would have gone for 2 DEs too especially with Dodd now gone. I will say Clayton needs to beef up some. We was around 220 range earlier in the year. Kelly is already right at 260

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 8:53 PM

I personally wanted Clayton over pretty much anyone in this class except Lawrence, S. Smith, and Gary.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:04 PM

I think long term Kelly is better, but I would have loved to have both. Clayton is like a slightly less athletic V. Beasley and Kelly is like a slightly more athletic S. Lawson. Would have been a nice contrast to give OLs fits. If we get Gary though, it won't bother me as much.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Wow, Clemson basically turned away a 5* DE


Jan 19, 2016, 9:22 PM

This is a pretty good assessment. Clayton's explosion jumps off the tape - to me, he's an oversign, especially now that we've lost both DEs

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We have the most 5 stars out of any team in the country


Jan 19, 2016, 8:58 PM

So what's the problem here? If it's not obvious our coaches know what they're doing, look again.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Promises Kept


Jan 19, 2016, 8:58 PM

Good for us - long term.

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


What about Steve Fullers son, CJ...


Jan 19, 2016, 9:10 PM

Can't wait until the Perry Quintuplets are eligible

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: What about Steve Fullers son, CJ...


Jan 19, 2016, 9:29 PM

People still b!tching after a 14-1 season....lol and SMDH

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

i'm kinda ok with current recruiting


Jan 19, 2016, 9:31 PM

literally cannot find anything that i need to beech about

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

GoTiguhs!!


Re: i'm kinda ok with current recruiting


Jan 19, 2016, 9:57 PM

I learned many years ago to not get caught up in recruiting ., Don't waste your time and thoughts
on ., Its always going to seem like we missed on some players ,., but In Dabo I trust ,., He has
put good players on the field at all positions ,.,. Have they missed blocks , catches ,. assignments
Yes they have ,.but we won 14 games in a row ,. I was proud of ALL of Them .,

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 64
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic