|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,642
|
Orange Blooded [4896]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5278
Joined: 8/24/11
|
The un-uncatchable interference call
Oct 12, 2014, 5:14 PM
|
|
I was in the West end zone and looked catchable to me. What did the at home audience think?
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Guru [1929]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 2510
Joined: 8/30/14
|
Re: The un-uncatchable interference call
Oct 12, 2014, 5:17 PM
|
|
I was still yelling at the TV. That ref just got it wrong IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [81645]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 47103
Joined: 3/18/07
|
It was only uncatchable because he couldn't jump because of
Oct 12, 2014, 5:18 PM
|
|
the defense passing interference. Refs blew the call completely, it was a good throw too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [433]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 721
Joined: 6/15/12
|
Re: The un-uncatchable interference call
Oct 12, 2014, 5:21 PM
|
|
Maybe uncatchable, but definitely close enough to call
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
It looked uncatchable from all angles on TV
Oct 12, 2014, 5:24 PM
|
|
they showed in my opinion. I think D holding would've been the proper call, not PI anyways, because he never got a release it seemed far beyond 5 yards from the LOS.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [148]
TigerPulse: 85%
Posts: 323
Joined: 4/26/03
|
Unless they would have given us 10 seconds
Oct 12, 2014, 5:57 PM
|
|
the call did not matter...it was second down from the 1 yard line
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16207]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13076
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Receiver would have needed a pretty good vertical jump...
Oct 12, 2014, 5:59 PM
|
|
...to catch it. Who is to say he couldn't jump that high up if not interfered with. I was fine with the zebra call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [32222]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6240
Joined: 10/1/12
|
It did not look catchable to me. ******
Oct 12, 2014, 6:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [439]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 745
Joined: 9/27/08
|
It looked too high.
Oct 12, 2014, 6:22 PM
|
|
I was upset with the call initially, but it looked too high in the replays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2182]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 2478
Joined: 10/10/13
|
Re: It looked too high.
Oct 12, 2014, 6:31 PM
|
|
I agree that I thought it was a good call after the replay.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3590]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 6987
Joined: 11/30/12
|
Ref was right there & immediately signaled uncatchable.
Oct 12, 2014, 6:51 PM
|
|
It looked high to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88961
Joined: 3/27/01
|
It was not interference, it was holding....
Oct 12, 2014, 7:05 PM
|
|
and it should have been called.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
Agreed! See my post in this thread. +1***
Oct 12, 2014, 7:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21722]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13534
Joined: 11/8/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,642
|
|
|
50
