Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Transfer Portal doesn't consider one stakeholder
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 1

Transfer Portal doesn't consider one stakeholder


Nov 29, 2021, 11:38 AM

That stakeholder is the donors.
These athletes are not attending school for free, they are attending because we the donors pay for them to attend. The portal rule doesn't care one lick about the fact that you are funding a student who can then turn around and not provide a benefit for your school.

One of the many reasons I do not like the "no sitting out, transfer anywhere" era of free-agent college sports.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Ehh, I think your consideration as a "stakeholder"...


Nov 29, 2021, 11:44 AM

...likely ends with helping the school pay for a single year scholarship, and (IMO) is definitely overshadowed by the player's freedom to pursue their career where they see fit. Just like it is a coach's freedom to move on, and your's as a "stakeholder" to choose what school to support.

With that said, I do think the current free-for-all is fundamentally changing college football and not for the better. My hope is that it somewhat calms down as players begin to realize they can be left out and that the grass isn't always greener. But either way, I don't like the current situation, but I don't think the answer is to remove the freedom from the players (who surely are the key cog in college football).

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


This post is so cringe.


Nov 29, 2021, 11:46 AM

Big yikes dude.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So you don't have to sit a year even if you haven't


Nov 29, 2021, 11:46 AM

graduated?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: So you don't have to sit a year even if you haven't


Nov 29, 2021, 12:12 PM

I think that the rule should state that teams who accept a transfer should lose a scholarship for another player. This will slow things down. For instance, if Clemson agrees to give a scholarship to a transfer running back they should lose a scholarship for a running back on the team. This will never happen

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Why?


Nov 29, 2021, 12:17 PM

All that would do is encourage a team to "cut" an "underperforming" player.

Seems the opposite of the desired effect.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: So you don't have to sit a year even if you haven't


Nov 29, 2021, 12:26 PM [ in reply to Re: So you don't have to sit a year even if you haven't ]

It's important to remember that a football scholarship is only a one year contract. It's has to be renewed each year. Because you are allowed to only have 85 some schools run off kids to make room for a better player. This was a very dark side of college football before the rule was changed. Why not let a kid transfer to a smaller program that might want him. All the power was with the school.
Clemson might not does this, but many programs do.

Part of the rule is to allow a kid to transfer, play and stay in school. Yes. Every now and then you LL lose a player you don't want to.

But it's only 4 to 6 a year that leave. I think in the long term everyone coming out ahead.

Remember you can always bring a kid in that may help you. Say a grad transfer QB from Stanford, that want to be a coach and is willing to mentor a young QB room. (Hint)

Maybe he was even on your scout team.(double hint)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Transfer Portal Change That would Slow Things...


Nov 29, 2021, 12:50 PM

.....if the portal stays how it is no doubt about it - college football is changed for the worse forever! To me; you have somewhat of a mix of how it used to be. A Transfer portal player sitting out the first 6 games; would dampen the whole thing a lot i.m.o.
Why 6 games? Because half the season is gone - are you willing to wait( player and team accepting transfer ) if so; have at it. If not, stay and compete for more minutes as hundreds of thousands or millions of players have done prior to the portal.
A player wanting to transfer that is getting a ton of minutes - but who just wants a change of scenery sorry if they get caught up in the wash.
You have to cut out "some of the instant gratification" on grounds of being fair to the school that lost the player! And because; it is a full-blown deterrent to abusing the transfer portal.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 7
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic