Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 35
| visibility 1

Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.


Apr 30, 2020, 11:37 AM

Apparently there's some real confusion among a lot of people on this board on how the First Amendment works, so I'm here to help. Let's go!

First, the actual words of the First Amendment:

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Now, this language of the amendment pertains exclusively to the government and publicly-funded entities Now, it doesn't mean that other government bodies other than Congress can restrict your free speech as one long ago P&R regular used to foolishly argue during the Bush years. This applies to all government and public entities.

That means the president or Congress or your local police or public schools, etc. Now, there are limits to this, of course, such as "fightin' words" or speech that could put people's lives at danger or libel/slander. Libel/slander is when you write or say something false about a person that causes defamation, or damages their reputation. Libel is written; slander is spoken.

So here's where I'm seeing confusion on this board. Some people seem to think the law of the First Amendment applies to private corporations. It doesn't.

For example, a public school can't restrict your religious freedoms or prevent a student from speaking out about politics. A private school, however, can do just that. They aren't governed by the First Amendment.

Or Tigernet. Crump and BMeist can regulate what's posted on here because it's their privately-owned site. Otherwise, they would have to allow every Gamecock troll or Nikola Tesla who wanted to post here, and we don't want that, right?

Thus, private corporations like YouTube or Twitter or Google cannot infringe on your right to free speech as they are allowed to dictate the content on their private site. Users who don't like those decisions can post their views elsewhere, or even try to create their own forum. And the government can't stop them from doing that.

But here's the big kicker: If you are a person advocating for places like YouTube or Twitter to be required to air all viewpoints and videos, that means you are calling for the government to violate the free speech rights guaranteed by the First Amendment to these corporations. Thus, YOU are the one who wants someone's free speech violated.

So, in short, private corporations cannot restrict your free speech. The First Amendment protects you from the government violating your speech rights. If a private corporation eliminates views you enjoy or won't let you air them on their websites, you have alternatives to get that info or express it elsewhere and the government can't stop you.

Are we all good now?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.


Apr 30, 2020, 11:49 AM

.



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-willmo.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up




Cat on a tin roof, dogs in a pile,
Nothin' left to do but smile, smile, smile!!!!


Re: Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.


Apr 30, 2020, 11:56 AM

Nope. The act of selectively “picking and choosing” forum content makes you a publisher, and the rules change. They’re exempted from standard libel law because it was understood they would operate as impartial, open channels of communication, not curators of acceptable opinions and content. They are blatantly stepping on the first amendment.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

^^^ This guy gets it!***


Apr 30, 2020, 11:56 AM



2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No he doesn't***


Apr 30, 2020, 12:19 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Heh. No.


Apr 30, 2020, 12:01 PM [ in reply to Re: Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works. ]

You really don't get it.

If you are a PRIVATE publisher, the First Amendment doesn't apply to you, at least in the sense that you have to publish everything.

Do newspapers publish every letter that comes in?

Go ahead. Try to sue YouTube for violating your First Amendment rights and see how far it gets. Or what lawyer will take the case.

Your case will be dead before it ever sees a courtroom.


It's amazing how many of y'all really don't grasp how the First Amendment applies only to government infringement on your speech. Or the absurdity of how you actually want the government to violate the speech of those companies.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Heh. No.


Apr 30, 2020, 12:07 PM

Then congress should rescind their libel exemption protection. You’re a platform or a publisher, not both. Let me reiterate, they were granted a libel exemption by the US Congress as long as they OPERATED AS A PLATFORM.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You're still not getting it...


Apr 30, 2020, 12:12 PM

Their libel exemption protects them in case I upload a defamatory video and they can't get it down in time before people see it, thus sparking a lawsuit against the major company. You could even have two people work in cahoots to upload that video just to bring about the big lawsuit.

That exemption doesn't automatically turn them into a public, government-sponsored forum of expression. It's a protection against crooks and bad people who would try to game the system.

They still exist as a private corporation. In fact, look at what you're arguing. It sounds like you're arguing these sites should be required to keep libelous and slanderous material up on their sites.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: You're still not getting it...


Apr 30, 2020, 1:11 PM

They’ve taken definitions of “defamatory and inappropriate” and applied it too broadly. It has reached a point where, for example, YouTube is removing videos that oppose a main stream narrative. Watch the following, then ask what would justify removal? Clearly, no standard of decency or content was violated.

https://banned.video/watch?id=5ea4994ea881fd00808e95ad

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You're still not getting it...


May 1, 2020, 1:58 AM

You still haven't made a case why they are subject to First Amendment compliance.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Heh. No.


Apr 30, 2020, 12:58 PM [ in reply to Heh. No. ]

If a newspaper doesn't publish every letter to the editor, why is a wedding cake maker forced to make a cake that clearly expresses it is made for two gays?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Heh. No.


Apr 30, 2020, 1:08 PM

Completely irrelevant to this discussion. And didn't the Supreme Court rule in favor of the cake maker?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


What does a wedding cake have to do with online forums?


Apr 30, 2020, 1:09 PM [ in reply to Re: Heh. No. ]

Are you being discriminated against again?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They don’t have to. Thanks to, you know, the rights that


Apr 30, 2020, 4:00 PM [ in reply to Re: Heh. No. ]

private businesses, like YouTube, have. Try again, maybe you’ll have better luck.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't think a lot of people realize that none of the


Apr 30, 2020, 11:59 AM

rights listed in the first amendment are absolute. We all agree with this, except maybe some people don't realize it.

For example, your freedom of speech is limited in lots of ways, like in cases of libel and slander, and making violent threats, inciting riots, etc.

Your freedom of assembly is limited. You often need a permit to assemble in certain ways.

Your freedom of religion is limited. For example, a religion does not have the right to "free exercise" of child sacrifice.

In all cases, the right is so limited because it is determined that the freedom of another person to live and to live safely takes precedence over the right.

To apply it to today, I believe, if got so far, a law temporarily prohibiting a physical meeting of a group of people in a church building would be upheld on Constitutional grounds, as long as there is not particular restriction placed on a church, not placed on other entities. The right to free exercise of that religion is being temporarily limited, in the interest of the freedom of other people to live and live safely.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I don't think a lot of people realize that none of the


Apr 30, 2020, 12:03 PM

To apply it to today, I believe, if got so far, a law temporarily prohibiting a physical meeting of a group of people in a church building would be upheld on Constitutional grounds, as long as there is not particular restriction placed on a church, not placed on other entities. The right to free exercise of that religion is being temporarily limited, in the interest of the freedom of other people to live and live safely.

I'm glad you get it.

Folks are still allowed to practice their religion freely through teleconference during this time. The First Amendment doesn't apply if you're putting people's lives in danger.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


I don't like to say "First Amendment doesn't apply".


Apr 30, 2020, 12:04 PM

I would rather say "this law does not violate the First Amendment".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Valid point.***


Apr 30, 2020, 12:05 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Now, if a government is sued, and they cannot demonstrate


Apr 30, 2020, 12:07 PM [ in reply to I don't think a lot of people realize that none of the ]

that the law is necessary for the preservation of life and safety, then they are going to be in trouble.

I'm all for a person suing if they feel like they need to. Let the courts decide...that's why they're there.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And I wouldn't be surprised...


Apr 30, 2020, 12:10 PM

If we see such a lawsuit once this is all over. I'd be shocked if some churches haven't already consulted attorneys.

A good example of what you cited is the court case Tinker v. Des Moines, which strongly protects First Amendment rights of students in K-12 schools. A school must provide valid evidence that the student's speech would disrupt the educational process (like, say, a noisy protest in the cafeteria or something). Otherwise, it's a no go for the school to restrict the speech.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


I pretty much agree, and in the thread in which I engaged


Apr 30, 2020, 12:27 PM [ in reply to I don't think a lot of people realize that none of the ]

the topic, I specifically called out the banning of parking lot and drive-in services, where everyone stayed in their car and maintained distance, as what felt like constitutional overreach. I think they would have a hard time in court defending how anyone was an imminent danger to themselves or others in that scenario.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I pretty much agree, and in the thread in which I engaged


Apr 30, 2020, 1:04 PM

Any law repugnant to the US Constitution should be willfully ignored.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

great rule to live by if you have an excess of time and


Apr 30, 2020, 1:09 PM

Money, because you’ll need both while you’re sitting in jail paying lawyers to take their sweet time proving you’re correct in the court system.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpgringofhonor-obed.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Problem is, until a judge rules, the constitutionality


Apr 30, 2020, 1:19 PM [ in reply to Re: I pretty much agree, and in the thread in which I engaged ]

is just, like, your opinion, man. Obed's post above is right. Do it that way if you must, but you'll pay the price.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think that law got shot down before it even got


Apr 30, 2020, 1:18 PM [ in reply to I pretty much agree, and in the thread in which I engaged ]

a chance to go in front of a judge. At least the specific incident in Alabama I'm thinking of.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So you're pulling for the virus to win so Joe can take DC.


Apr 30, 2020, 12:45 PM

I would never have guessed.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lol wut***


Apr 30, 2020, 1:10 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Lol wut***


Apr 30, 2020, 1:10 PM [ in reply to So you're pulling for the virus to win so Joe can take DC. ]



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Lol wut


Apr 30, 2020, 1:10 PM [ in reply to So you're pulling for the virus to win so Joe can take DC. ]

Nm

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.


Apr 30, 2020, 12:46 PM

'so we don't want that, right?' Are you Crump or BMeist?

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Today's lesson on how the First Amendment works.


Apr 30, 2020, 1:09 PM

Last time I checked, nope. Your point?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Don't underestimate your audience. They are not dumber


Apr 30, 2020, 4:43 PM

than you. People use "freedom of speech" in colloquial terms, often referring to the principle more than the legal right. When one refers to "due process" in a non court setting, they don't expect a legal enforcing of a person's presumption of innocence, but are referring to the way truth is discerned rather than assumed.

But with these long explanations apparently being needed, we are at least acknowledging what some have denied: the media is radically left, to the point of shutting down voices and information they don't like. Thank you for the tutorial on legal vs colloquial use of a call to open mindedness, but we at least now know that we all know the media ignores it.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Don't underestimate your audience. They are not dumber


Apr 30, 2020, 7:13 PM

It’s oppression, pure and simple. Examples can be seen everywhere now.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Let it be known...


May 1, 2020, 1:52 AM

On this day, MemphisCat claimed YouTube oppresses him.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


Re: Don't underestimate your audience. They are not dumber


May 1, 2020, 1:51 AM [ in reply to Don't underestimate your audience. They are not dumber ]

Don't underestimate your audience. They are not dumber than you.

I didn't say they were dumber. But anyone who doesn't understand that the First Amendment only applies to government infringement, well, they're suspect.

People use "freedom of speech" in colloquial terms, often referring to the principle more than the legal right. When one refers to "due process" in a non court setting, they don't expect a legal enforcing of a person's presumption of innocence, but are referring to the way truth is discerned rather than assumed.

I think you need to go read some of these posts. They're arguing that YouTube and other private companies are restricting their free speech. So no, not what you're saying.

But with these long explanations apparently being needed, we are at least acknowledging what some have denied: the media is radically left, to the point of shutting down voices and information they don't like. Thank you for the tutorial on legal vs colloquial use of a call to open mindedness, but we at least now know that we all know the media ignores it.

This topic and the opinions I'm addressing have nothing to do with the media. YouTube, Google, Twitter, Facebook, etc. are not the media.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


A narrow distinction. Is there any news media? I do not


May 1, 2020, 3:06 AM

know of one source that does not operate primarily as opinion / entertainment / veiwpoint-influencers. When google and youtube unapologetically do the same thing, what is the difference? One has by-lines, the other doesn't: that's it. To defend them by affirming their legality seems to be a last resort defense, openly throwing in the towel on what the left once claimed as their defining characteristic: tolerance and open mindedness. No more of that, I guess. Now there will be some technical defense for what the FBI did to Flynn, for why Comey should not be in jail, and that youtube will take down any contrary view.

But you're right, its legal. Great country we're creating,

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 35
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic