Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers
Tiger Boards - Women's Sports
add New Topic
Replies: 16
| visibility 451

TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers

3

Apr 7, 2023, 10:15 PM
Reply

 
No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lot of things wrong with this article...more than just the wording

1

Apr 7, 2023, 10:30 PM
Reply

Bomhardt was pinch running for Jacobsen. Bomhardt wasn't trying to steal. It was just her secondary lead, and the catcher tried to catch her napping.

The whole explanation of a sac fly is weird. But, it makes far more sense than the explanation of the go-ahead run. Not trying to be critical, but the author needs to rewrite this one.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

And no where in the article does it say..


Apr 7, 2023, 11:27 PM
Reply

And the final score was…. What? 3-2? I can’t tell from the article

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lot of things wrong with this article...more than just the wording

1

Apr 7, 2023, 11:32 PM [ in reply to Lot of things wrong with this article...more than just the wording ]
Reply

In addition to telling us that Clark had both hits, but yet she scored on Cagle's single in the first. That makes 3, so something is incorrect.

Gotta figure that with the holiday, the writing team was shortstaffed and the article was written by someone with more enthusiasm than knowledge.

I'm all in favor of both, so I hope there is a kindly but yet critical review process that provides opportunity for improvement. Watch a few more games, perhaps?

Meanwhile, scoring twice vs FSU is a step in the right direction. But did you see how frequently the Noles again advanced baserunners with productive outs? We're not in that class yet.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lot of things wrong with this article...more than just the wording


Apr 8, 2023, 1:25 PM
Reply

OK, I get what you're saying but, I also see that you don't donate a penny to the site, so why are complaining about something that you have nothing invested. I'm sure you got the message that was intended by whomever posted it, and you're getting that message for free, so why are you slamming the writer. Just leave it alone bc it cost you nothing...

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Lot of things wrong with this article...more than just the wording


Apr 8, 2023, 4:19 PM
Reply

Ummm...because the Terms of Use don't require me to pay to comment. In the US, we expect people to take pride in their (our) work, and if we need improvement we would rather be told so by a friendly critic than a rude one.

The writer did an excellent job from a journalistic standpoint in giving the full names, class and position of everyone whose actions were instrumental in the outcome of the game (except for the oversight of the PR). If he/she needs an attaboy to give to their instructor next week, I will be glad to give it in lieu of the cent you're suggesting would qualify me to comment.

But I also hope the writer takes the time to learn the game a little more, hopefully from someone who knows and loves it as much as the other highly professional writers on staff do.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Really really tough weekend…


Apr 7, 2023, 11:34 PM
Reply

Let’s regroup and beat the dirtpeckers!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 8, 2023, 1:12 AM
Reply

Why doesn’t the article say what the score was?

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers

2

Apr 8, 2023, 10:05 AM
Reply

The greatest disappointment was that FSU had our Tigers scouted on not maintaining field and base running awareness. They were ready to exploit it on the throw back to Cagle. I would also say May at first was too slow to turn around and force the runner rounding third back to the base. That’s for certain one run, but possibly two runs the Tigers essentially gifted the Noles. The difference in a game with very few hits. Hopefully Rittman uses this series as a teaching moment. That’s the next step towards becoming a legit top 10 team. Winning the mental game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 8, 2023, 11:30 AM
Reply

Yeah, that last run when the FSU 3rd base runner “sneaked” into home plate because no one was paying attention was embarrassing for us and painfully demonstrated the lack of awareness and mental readiness required to win a top ten matchup.
Despite a great deal of experience, we had several lapses during this series. Hopefully, we’re more prepared next time.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 8, 2023, 12:07 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers ]
Reply

This Tigers will get there . This series pointed out weaknesses but this is a young program. The best is yet to come.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 8, 2023, 12:07 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers ]
Reply

This Tigers will get there . This series pointed out weaknesses but this is a young program. The best is yet to come.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Step..away..from..the...BUTTON!

1

Apr 8, 2023, 12:15 PM
Reply

:)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Yeah it’s a young program


Apr 8, 2023, 12:37 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers ]
Reply

But we have an all time great player now

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 8, 2023, 12:07 PM [ in reply to Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers ]
Reply

This Tigers will get there . This series pointed out weaknesses but this is a young program. The best is yet to come.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The girls never had confidence


Apr 8, 2023, 12:54 PM
Reply

It was a painful series to watch. FSU lives rent free in their heads. The only bat that was alive was Cagles. The Noles do not have the athletes we do from top to bottom. I saw someone mention productive outs, yes, FSU played small ball well. I also feel that “we aren’t there yet” was a terrible assessment of the program. This team is good enough to beat anyone in the country. This team is the blueprint for how to build a top 10 program in 4 years. They can do everything well, except hit FSU pitchers. Sandercock is one of the greatest to ever pitch. But, these girls should have had no problem with her. Our lineup from top to bottom has one of the highest batting averages in the nation. We need to schedule more elite teams. The schedule to date was weak and FSU exposed us a bit. I still believe this team can play with anyone and could win it all. IF they get their confidence up.

2024 student level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: TNET: No. 4 Seminoles sweep No. 4 Tigers


Apr 9, 2023, 9:07 AM
Reply

This is a terribly written article. It starts by saying Cagle had a single in the first inning but later says McKenzie Clark had the only 2 hits for Clemson. It completely butchers what happened in the top of the fifth. Poorly written, inaccurate information.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Replies: 16
| visibility 451
Tiger Boards - Women's Sports
add New Topic