Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Trillion $ coin would be awseome.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 16
| visibility 1

Trillion $ coin would be awseome.


Jan 14, 2013, 7:28 AM

Treasury: We won’t mint a platinum coin to sidestep the debt ceiling

Posted by Ezra Klein on January 12, 2013 at 3:32 pm




The Treasury Department will not mint a trillion-dollar platinum coin to get around the debt ceiling. If they did, the Federal Reserve would not accept it.

That’s the bottom line of the statement that Anthony Coley, a spokesman for the Treasury Department, gave me today. “Neither the Treasury Department nor the Federal Reserve believes that the law can or should be used to facilitate the production of platinum coins for the purpose of avoiding an increase in the debt limit,” he said.

The inclusion of the Federal Reserve is significant. For the platinum coin idea to work, the Federal Reserve would have to treat it as a legal way for the Treasury Department to create currency. If they don’t believe it’s legal and would not credit the Treasury Department’s deposit, the platinum coin would be worthless.

The idea of minting a platinum coin to invalidate the debt ceiling comes from a few key sentences tacked onto the 1997 Omnibus Consolidated Appropriations Act. “Notwithstanding any other provision of law,” it reads, “the Secretary of the Treasury may mint and issue platinum coins in such quantity and of such variety as the Secretary determines to be appropriate.”

The author of those sentences was Mike Castle, a Republican congressman from Delaware. The intent was to help coin collectors who wanted the Treasury Department to mint cheaper platinum coins. “People couldn’t afford the $600 investment, so they wanted the flexibility to put in smaller coinage so that people could collect them,” Castle told Wonkblog this month. But in giving the Treasury Department the flexibility to mint platinum coins of little value, Castle accidentally gave them the flexibility to mint platinum coins of unlimited value. “That was never the intent of anything that I drafted or that anyone who worked with me drafted,” Castle continued.

The idea of minting a trillion-dollar platinum coin was first floated in May 2010, in the comment section of “The Center of the Universe,” a blog devoted to Modern Monetary Theory. The author was a lawyer writing under the pseudonym Beowulf. “Curiously enough Congress has already delegated to [Treasury] all the seignorage power authority it needs to mint a $1 trillion coin (even numismatic coins are legal tender at their face value and must be accepted by the Federal Reserve) — the catch is, it’s gotta be made of platinum.”

The platinum coin idea gained some powerful adherents during the debt-ceiling crisis of 2011, but it really developed traction following the 2012 fiscal cliff deal, as politicians and economics writers realized that the country would, indeed, be facing another debt-ceiling crisis in a matter of months. A Twitter campaign by Joe Weisenthal, of Business Insider, and Josh Barro, of Bloomberg View, forced it into the conversation, and subsequent endorsements by Rep. Jerry Nadler (D-NY), Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman and former U.S. Mint director Philip Diehl gave it further legitimacy.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/12/treasury-we-wont-mint-a-platinum-coin-to-sidestep-the-debt-ceiling/

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


i see by your pic that a trillion dollar coin


Jan 14, 2013, 7:31 AM

is worth a hundred dollars

badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The $1 Trillion coin would therefore have to be


Jan 14, 2013, 7:37 AM

10 billion times bigger

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: The $1 Trillion coin would therefore have to be


Jan 15, 2013, 12:17 AM

http://www.popehat.com/2013/01/10/the-trillion-dollar-coin-a-practical-guide-to-curing-americas-deficit/

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

An elegant solution. You have my admiration.***


Jan 15, 2013, 8:09 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China


Jan 14, 2013, 8:52 AM

or any foreign entity that holds our debt. No one ever mentions this small fact in the hair-brained discussions I've heard.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I thought it was hare-brained


Jan 14, 2013, 9:07 AM

as in rabbit brained. But hair brained gives an image of the hair growing inward. That is weird & creepy.

Why wouldn't China (or any other nation) accept it? I mean, other than it's stupid. Wouldn't it still be backed by the US gov't?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China


Jan 14, 2013, 9:14 AM [ in reply to Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China ]

tired of hearing that china holds all of our debt, they hold less than 8 percent. The largest share is American corporations and individuals in the form of treasury bonds, 30 percent is is government trust funds like social security.

so next time you preface an argument like, we should not have to borrow money from china to fund(fill in the blank with the government entitlement you despise the most), think again.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

China is actually Number 2.


Jan 14, 2013, 9:44 AM

8 percent or not. So from a single entity that holds the debt, that is a correct statement.

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/biggest-holders-of-us-gov-t-debt.html

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LOL @ Social Security***


Jan 14, 2013, 11:33 AM [ in reply to Re: Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You just hit TBalm with a fact.


Jan 14, 2013, 12:33 PM

He will now go into hiding.

Thanks for making that happen.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fine, Americans wouldn't accept it either


Jan 14, 2013, 4:03 PM [ in reply to Re: Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China ]

I sure as hell wouldn't buy a t-bond backed by $0.000000000001 worth of platinum.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-tiggity-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Those countries have already stopped purchasing the debt.


Jan 14, 2013, 11:33 AM [ in reply to Fed wouldn't accept it because neither would China ]

Now it's mostly just the Fed purchasing the debt, which means it's a circle-jerk of made-up money.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our money is all "fiat" anyway...


Jan 14, 2013, 11:11 PM

We could just declare all debt forgiven ... a big "do over" so to speak, and then revert back to the gold standard.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fiat_money

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

does gm own fiat***


Jan 15, 2013, 7:08 AM



badge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yep. Only thing that makes the $ worth something is all


Jan 15, 2013, 11:49 AM [ in reply to Our money is all "fiat" anyway... ]

those troops, wars, foreign bases, weapons, planes, and ships.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They should use a $1B coin for the Coin Flip at the Super


Jan 15, 2013, 11:50 AM

Bowl..

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 16
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic