|
Replies: 19
| visibility 1
|
All-TigerNet [13693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4838
Joined: 9/17/05
|
Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 3:33 PM
|
|
makes it increasingly likely we’ll see the dissolution of the ACC by an 8-conference member majority.
Those 8-teams will have a negotiated landing spot that’s a win-win for themselves and with those they intend to partner as a requisite.
Big Ten commissioner Kevin Warren said July 26 that he looked forward to welcoming more media partners into the league.
"This is not just a normal one-unit television deal," Warren told ESPN. "This is going to be forward-thinking. I want people 20 years from now to look back and go, 'Wow, man, they were ahead of the curve on that deal.'"
The Big Ten's new media rights agreement, which still must be approved by league presidents and chancellors, reportedly is set to bring the league more than $1 billion annually.
I’m also more confident that above all, Clemson will do what’s best for Clemson.
Change is coming.
|
|
|
|
 |
Athletic Dir [865]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 2032
Joined: 10/4/10
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 3:37 PM
|
|
Name eight ACC schools that are worth $100 million dollars per year to television
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [292]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 82
Joined: 12/8/20
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 3:39 PM
|
|
Football:
Clemson
Florida state
Miami
Virginia tech (if ever good again)
Georgia tech (if ever good again)
Pitt
Basketball:
Duke
North Carolina.
I know it’s eight but I mean
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [292]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 82
Joined: 12/8/20
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 3:40 PM
|
|
Edit I thought you were asking for 10 teams that’s why I said what I said
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12779
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 4:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036 ] |
|
Ga Tech can't even sell out their 55,000 stadium with Clemson as the visiting team. They are not a football draw and are part of the baggage problem affecting us and other ACC football-intensive programs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2336]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2023
Joined: 6/3/18
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 6:05 PM
|
|
They got more Natty’s than the coots in football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10837]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12683
Joined: 9/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14751]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 22551
Joined: 5/14/03
|
Then dissolve without homes and form a national league to
Aug 9, 2022, 3:45 PM
|
|
compete with SEC and BIG with all the scraps from b12/p12/acc/others
South Pod
Clemson
Florida State
GT
Miami
UCF
North Pod
UNC
Duke
UVA
VT
Louisville
West Pod
Stanford
Cal
Oregon
Washington
Utah
Mid West Pod
Notre Dame
Kansas
Baylor
Oklahoma State
SMU
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4838
Joined: 9/17/05
|
Re: Then dissolve without homes and form a national league to
Aug 9, 2022, 3:51 PM
|
|
Something like this could be realistic, or a split the baby option with the B1G and SEC.
What would need to be true regardless is that 8-teams in the ACC get on the same page, have their agreements inked, then dissolve the conference. That’s a lot of moving parts, but functionally doable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8531]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 11500
Joined: 9/9/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4838
Joined: 9/17/05
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 3:41 PM
[ in reply to Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036 ] |
|
I’m not suggesting any 8-teams in the ACC could equal that. I am stating that there are at least eight that could dissolve the conference thereby negating any legal/financial impact of the GOR AND have negotiated agreements in place superior to the one they’re in now.
None of those options include only themselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Associate AD [806]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 794
Joined: 7/30/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12779
Joined: 11/14/09
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 4:43 PM
[ in reply to Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036 ] |
|
Not $100 million maybe but $75-80 range as a single division playing one another more often:
Clemson
Miami
FSU
Va Tech
Louisville
Pitt
NC State
UNC
Add West Va for a 9th and that will do it. Beasts of the East.
Ga Tech, UVA, Duke, Wake, BC, and Syracuse can form a 2nd division for football with three more eastern schools and cut their own football deal.
For other sports we can stay together and split evenly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [55376]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58381
Joined: 7/18/07
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 5:52 PM
[ in reply to Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036 ] |
|
Name eight ACC schools that are worth $100 million dollars per year to television
I feel as you, there isn't 8 ACC school worth and 50 mil a year as a FB school, and it's FB that will bring in the bucks. I think that only Clemson, FSU, and Miami are the only true FB schools in the ACC. As far as VT, once Beamer retire, the VT admin no longer give a crap about FB, and they have proved that with their lack of upgrades that will keep up with the Joneses of college FB!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8531]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 11500
Joined: 9/9/06
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 4:13 PM
|
|
Don't count your chickens until they hatch. Patience and things will work out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4838
Joined: 9/17/05
|
Our conference leadership may be “hope as a strategy” type folks, but
Aug 9, 2022, 4:19 PM
|
|
I have more confidence in Clemson’s.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3220]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3441
Joined: 11/3/03
|
+1 for proper use of Juxtaposed***
Aug 9, 2022, 4:19 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10442]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11552
Joined: 6/29/01
|
Commissioner Warren, people 20 years from now are more
Aug 9, 2022, 4:31 PM
|
|
likely to say, "Wow man, they ruined college football on that deal."
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [31240]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9122
Joined: 8/31/15
|
Re: Stories about the pending B1G media deal juxtaposed against the ACC til 2036
Aug 9, 2022, 4:32 PM
|
|
Been on the SEC band wagon but now seeing the B1G is cutting ESPN I believe I have changed my mind.
At the end of the day whichever we get would be fine. Anything to help us monetarily keep up with our competition.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4838
Joined: 9/17/05
|
Yep. Why this matters??
Aug 9, 2022, 4:58 PM
|
|
2021 Clemson athletics revenue: $123MM:
50% donations,
30% media rights,
20% tickets, govt, other.
That’s $37MM for media rights.
B1G schools are expected to bring in $60MM under their new deal.
Addressing that disparity would bring media rights up to 50% of our athletic budget at parity with donations.
Football revenue IS the engine that supports ALL Clemson athletics; where it is today and what it aspires to be in the future. It simply can’t and won’t be left to “things working themselves out.”
https://knightnewhousedata.org/fbs/acc/clemson-university#!quicktabs-tab-where_the_money-1
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 19
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
