|
Replies: 60
| visibility 5,933
|
Recruit [93]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 205
Joined: 3/2/14
|
South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 11:02 AM
|
|
South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for this Thursday
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [7297]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2763
Joined: 11/24/13
|
i'll say.....
Aug 25, 2014, 11:04 AM
|
|
aTm - zero
coots - infinity
although it may not be that close.
go football.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6482
Joined: 9/29/12
|
^^homer^^
Aug 25, 2014, 11:06 AM
|
|
nawt raisinable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27366]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 26233
Joined: 9/19/11
|
He said "SCORE predictions", not "ARRESTS"***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:29 AM
[ in reply to i'll say..... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1431]
TigerPulse: 56%
Posts: 2153
Joined: 1/29/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [38427]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 33200
Joined: 7/28/11
|
Re: He said "SCORE predictions", not "ARRESTS"***
Aug 25, 2014, 3:21 PM
|
|
31-30 @T?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1476]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1859
Joined: 12/29/04
|
A&M Rolls
Aug 25, 2014, 11:30 AM
[ in reply to i'll say..... ] |
|
Texas A&M 56
Worst school in the world - 3
Speedy Noil and Ricky Seals Jones combine for 5 TD's minimum.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3422]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 6697
Joined: 10/3/09
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 11:05 AM
|
|
South Carolina - 27
Texas A&M - 24
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [12505]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10500
Joined: 1/14/11
|
63-17 GO AGGIES!!***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:06 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [13]
TigerPulse: 12%
Posts: 34
Joined: 12/20/13
|
Re: 63-17 GO AGGIES!!***
Aug 25, 2014, 12:36 PM
|
|
For some reason,your VERY UNREASONABLE prediction
conjures up a score from the past- how about
USC 70 A&M 33
Such sweet numbers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21846]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15707
Joined: 10/23/12
|
you do realize that 63-17 is a worse loss and that you guys
Aug 25, 2014, 1:21 PM
|
|
have never come close to beating us that bad right??....keep living off of others accomplishments...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [201]
TigerPulse: 23%
Posts: 734
Joined: 10/22/01
|
Re: you do realize that 63-17 is a worse loss and that you guys
Aug 25, 2014, 2:55 PM
|
|
you must be a youngster, guess you were not around for the 56-20 beat down south Carolina put on Clemson....pretty close in comparison to 63-17
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
45-0 was a nasty loss***
Aug 25, 2014, 2:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21846]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15707
Joined: 10/23/12
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6321]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5728
Joined: 11/2/08
|
or we could use another sweet score..
Aug 25, 2014, 1:49 PM
[ in reply to Re: 63-17 GO AGGIES!!*** ] |
|
Aggies 56
Coot 6
you so see that that the coots lost to Florida in 2008..coach was SOS. You lost by 50 and you want to make fun of Clemson losing 70-33..we lost but it was by 37.
And I am being nice..I could have used 63-17..do the math
|
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [484]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 1256
Joined: 7/9/14
|
Re: 63-17 GO AGGIES!!***
Aug 25, 2014, 8:25 PM
[ in reply to Re: 63-17 GO AGGIES!!*** ] |
|
Since it is an SEC east vs west, how about 56-17??
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [26968]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 44823
Joined: 7/6/10
|
SC wins 30-20
Aug 25, 2014, 11:07 AM
|
|
My prediction has no basis in reality...I pretty much just made the numbers up. Neither team has played yet, so I have no idea how good either of them are. I cannot name a single player who plays for Texas A&M.
That said, YOU CAN TAKE THAT PREDICTION TO THE BANK!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
Re: SC wins 30-20
Aug 25, 2014, 11:10 AM
|
|
Just like all those winning streaks the braves have went on this season like you predicted lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: SC wins 30-20
Aug 25, 2014, 2:49 PM
[ in reply to SC wins 30-20 ] |
|
Tell us Coot! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [96831]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 29208
Joined: 9/14/05
|
SCAR 27, aTm 17
Aug 25, 2014, 11:07 AM
|
|
As painful as that was to type.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7297]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2763
Joined: 11/24/13
|
you are a good man bob, a very good man.
Aug 25, 2014, 11:09 AM
|
|
short, but good.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
SC 34- ATM 27
Aug 25, 2014, 11:12 AM
|
|
I think it might be closer than people are saying because I think ATM's offense will still be pretty good while USC's defense won't be very good. On the other hand, I don't know if ATM's defense has improved enough at this point (despite some analysts saying they'll be a big surprise) to shut USC down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6620
Joined: 11/30/98
|
51 to 49 Texas A&M.***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:12 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [27371]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 31824
Joined: 8/19/03
|
can;t decide
Aug 25, 2014, 11:19 AM
|
|
either 3 - 0 no offense
or 49 - 48 no defense
GO TIGERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20540]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11683
Joined: 10/15/02
|
we know how this ###### goes
Aug 25, 2014, 11:32 AM
[ in reply to 51 to 49 Texas A&M.*** ] |
|
South Carolina 22, A&M 17. The game will be ugly as sin.
South Carolina always looks like crap Week 1...which annually inspires a great deal of glee among us Clemson faithful about how this year South Carolina is ready to fall off a cliff.
Mind, Spurrier always then pulls a horseshoe or two out of his butt and wins the game anyway...and then they look way, way better the next week as he figures out what he's got. Spurrier has never really had a ton of talent at South Carolina, especially on the offensive side of the ball...but Spurrier does not need a great deal of talent on offense. You can make an argument Spurrier is the greatest play-caller in the history of college football. Like him or hate him, the man is that good.
And the Aggies' D is weak, weak, weak. Spurrier will find a way to get to it eventually, however ugly...and with the Aggies replacing Manziel, WR Mike Evans, and OT Jake Long, I don't see them being particularly effective on offense...not on the road, and not against South Carolina's D, which is fairly formidable. In terms of scheme and tempo, nobody will confuse the Aggie O with the likes of Auburn under Gus Malzahn...or Clemson under Chad Morris.
South Carolina will win no style points in this one...but they'll win - unless the replacements for that trio A&M lost are just way more capable than anybody expects. Getting South Carolina in Billy Brice in a long-distance Thursday night game for the opener is just about the worst possible start for Texas A&M's new starters.
Give our Coot brethren some credit. Their program is as good as it's ever been, right now...and Spurrier is one of the top five college coaches of all time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [145]
TigerPulse: 33%
Posts: 325
Joined: 10/5/08
|
Re: we know how this ###### goes
Aug 25, 2014, 1:15 PM
|
|
> South Carolina 22, A&M 17. The game will be ugly as
> sin.
>
> South Carolina always looks like crap Week 1...which
> annually inspires a great deal of glee among us
> Clemson faithful about how this year South
> Carolina is ready to fall off a cliff.
>
> Mind, Spurrier always then pulls a horseshoe or two
> out of his butt and wins the game anyway...and then
> they look way, way better the next week as he figures
> out what he's got. Spurrier has never really had a
> ton of talent at South Carolina, especially on the
> offensive side of the ball...but Spurrier does not
> need a great deal of talent on offense. You can make
> an argument Spurrier is the greatest play-caller in
> the history of college football. Like him or hate
> him, the man is that good.
>
> And the Aggies' D is weak, weak, weak. Spurrier will
> find a way to get to it eventually, however
> ugly...and with the Aggies replacing Manziel, WR Mike
> Evans, and OT Jake Long, I don't see them being
> particularly effective on offense...not on the road,
> and not against South Carolina's D, which is fairly
> formidable. In terms of scheme and tempo, nobody will
> confuse the Aggie O with the likes of Auburn under
> Gus Malzahn...or Clemson under Chad Morris.
>
> South Carolina will win no style points in this
> one...but they'll win - unless the replacements for
> that trio A&M lost are just way more capable than
> anybody expects. Getting South Carolina in Billy
> Brice in a long-distance Thursday night game for the
> opener is just about the worst possible start for
> Texas A&M's new starters.
>
> Give our Coot brethren some credit. Their program is
> as good as it's ever been, right now...and Spurrier
> is one of the top five college coaches of all time.
You're an idiot if you think Spurrier hasn't had any talent on the offensive side of the ball.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [20540]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11683
Joined: 10/15/02
|
Re: we know how this ###### goes
Aug 25, 2014, 2:47 PM
|
|
> > South Carolina 22, A&M 17. The game will be ugly
> as
> > sin.
> >
> > South Carolina always looks like crap Week
> 1...which
> > annually inspires a great deal of glee among us
> > Clemson faithful about how this year South
> > Carolina is ready to fall off a cliff.
> >
> > Mind, Spurrier always then pulls a horseshoe or
> two
> > out of his butt and wins the game anyway...and
> then
> > they look way, way better the next week as he
> figures
> > out what he's got. Spurrier has never really had a
> > ton of talent at South Carolina, especially on the
> > offensive side of the ball...but Spurrier does not
> > need a great deal of talent on offense. You can
> make
> > an argument Spurrier is the greatest play-caller
> in
> > the history of college football. Like him or hate
> > him, the man is that good.
> >
> > And the Aggies' D is weak, weak, weak. Spurrier
> will
> > find a way to get to it eventually, however
> > ugly...and with the Aggies replacing Manziel, WR
> Mike
> > Evans, and OT Jake Long, I don't see them being
> > particularly effective on offense...not on the
> road,
> > and not against South Carolina's D, which is
> fairly
> > formidable. In terms of scheme and tempo, nobody
> will
> > confuse the Aggie O with the likes of Auburn under
> > Gus Malzahn...or Clemson under Chad Morris.
> >
> > South Carolina will win no style points in this
> > one...but they'll win - unless the replacements
> for
> > that trio A&M lost are just way more capable than
> > anybody expects. Getting South Carolina in Billy
> > Brice in a long-distance Thursday night game for
> the
> > opener is just about the worst possible start for
> > Texas A&M's new starters.
> >
> > Give our Coot brethren some credit. Their program
> is
> > as good as it's ever been, right now...and
> Spurrier
> > is one of the top five college coaches of all
> time.
>
> You're an idiot if you think Spurrier hasn't had any
> talent on the offensive side of the ball.
I love civil disagreements. And you're wrong.
He hasn't had a ton of talent, sorry. He's won with the likes of Stephen "Achilles" Garcia and Connor Shaw at QB. Shaw was underrated, mind, but he's still a 6-foot guy who did not have Tajh Boyd's cannon arm or 230 pounds when he decided to slash between the tackles...but Shaw still posted All-SEC numbers. He beat us two years ago with Shaw's backup, Dylan Thompson - in Death Valley, in Thompson's first start.
He's had some good wideouts, especially Alshon Jeffrey, and Bruce Ellington wasn't bad either...though B.E. tumbled huge in the draft because there was a great deal of concern in NFL circles that he was another classic Spurrier receiver - somebody who generated huge numbers in college because Spurrier schemed him open but maybe wasn't near as talented as his highlight reel indicated.
Lattimore was a very good RB...before his leg almost fell off. It didn't slow the offense down. Mike Davis is a very good RB (who we slow-played because we had other RB's on our boards rated higher) probably about as good as James Davis was for us...which translates into probably a 6th-round grade in the NFL draft.
They have had NOTHING resembling Clemson's recent fleet of NFL wideouts, though, and nobody would confuse those RB's with CJ Spiller or Andre Ellington, or Dwayne Allen at TE.
Their OL is huge...but for the most part, especially early in Spurrier's tenure, it was composed of guys a lot of teams passed on - including Clemson. Brandon Shell is the only true blue-chip they've signed there in recent memory - Clifton Geathers in '07 had pedigree, but a lot of teams passed on him because he was a very, very passive kid who just wasn't that interested in football, and preferred to hunt and fish than lift weights. We passed on OT Kyle Nunn, for instance, because our coaching staff thought he moved like Lurch from The Addams Family, but he started at USC - and did well, despite his athletic limitations - for three years! We passed on TE's like Foxy Foxworth and Justice Cunningham despite the fact that they tried incredibly hard to lobby their way into Clemson because they couldn't break a 5-flat 40 even with lit bottle rockets taped to their butts. Spurrier turned around and murdered us with them.
Talent for talent, player for player, they haven't been nearly as talented as Clemson on offense the last few years. Spurrier doesn't let that stop him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2198]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 4710
Joined: 12/30/04
|
38-17 coots
Aug 25, 2014, 11:23 AM
|
|
A&M d wont keep SC from scoring. After SC gets up a couple early Hill will press and SC will have several take aways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1898]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3418
Joined: 11/7/01
|
Unfortunately, that's about right.***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:40 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [19610]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16899
Joined: 9/5/02
|
5 -2 TAM
Aug 25, 2014, 11:24 AM
|
|
as ESPN raves about another epic SEC defensive battle!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Head Coach [790]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 2312
Joined: 9/1/05
|
Coots 31 Ag's 24
Aug 25, 2014, 11:25 AM
|
|
nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8244]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7565
Joined: 1/1/11
|
cockerels-L vs T A&M-W***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:25 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21614]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23418
Joined: 8/16/03
|
SCAR 27 TAMU 13***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:26 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5804]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5374
Joined: 9/5/10
|
SC 27 a&m 24
Aug 25, 2014, 11:27 AM
|
|
.........
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [36450]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18324
Joined: 12/6/13
|
35 to 33 Texas AM***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:31 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30789]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34479
Joined: 6/22/03
|
scar by more than 10 pts***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:32 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7026]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15682
Joined: 10/10/02
|
I'll go with 28-24 TAMU on a late TD... Sounds good anyway.***
Aug 25, 2014, 11:35 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [51]
TigerPulse: 16%
Posts: 92
Joined: 9/22/01
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 11:38 AM
|
|
Scar 2 - 0 Tam, in Overtime
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [276]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 366
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 12:22 PM
|
|
South Carolina 35 A&M 17
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88988
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I'll take A&M +18 for any amount your willing to lose.***
Aug 25, 2014, 12:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88988
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Your silence is noted***
Aug 25, 2014, 12:58 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [276]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 366
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: Your silence is noted***
Aug 25, 2014, 1:00 PM
|
|
I don't bet on games, it takes all the fun out of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64575]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88988
Joined: 3/27/01
|
^^^^ Not willing to put his money where his mouth is ^^^^
Aug 25, 2014, 2:17 PM
|
|
Capons by 18, that is unless I have to bet my own money on it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 12:55 PM
|
|
Honestly I could care less!!!
The real game is played starting at 5:30 PM EST.
GO Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2772]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3736
Joined: 1/15/13
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 12:56 PM
|
|
Honestly I could care less!!!
The real game is played starting at 5:30 PM EST. Saturday
GO Tigers!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [276]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 366
Joined: 3/9/11
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 12:58 PM
|
|
I have to say that I'm really looking forward to that game as well. It's going to be a great one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2557]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3678
Joined: 2/18/09
|
unfortunately, 31-20 coots***
Aug 25, 2014, 1:22 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21846]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15707
Joined: 10/23/12
|
31-17 ags***
Aug 25, 2014, 1:23 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93661]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95412
Joined: 12/25/09
|
I hope AnM wins by ten.
Aug 25, 2014, 1:26 PM
|
|
Coots -10 AnM 0
More like coot 27 AnM 13
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5912]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 8567
Joined: 11/30/98
|
TAMU 40 usc 35***
Aug 25, 2014, 2:20 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asst Coach [706]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 910
Joined: 5/25/10
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 2:49 PM
|
|
South Carolina 24
Texas A&M 21
Home field advantage wins this early, ugly game
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3257]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7167
Joined: 7/27/99
|
Leonard's loser, in an upset, coots will lose to A&M 27-17!***
Aug 25, 2014, 2:53 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3976]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4990
Joined: 8/9/12
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 3:08 PM
|
|
I say half the players and fans pass out from the 98 degree heat and humidity.
Coots will pull it out at home again thanks to the polluted air that reigns supreme in Cola. Only they are use to it.
Coots 27
A&M 21
2 Visor throws
1 coaches argument on the sidelines.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
55-53
Aug 25, 2014, 3:09 PM
|
|
aTm wins in a shoutout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1475]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1213
Joined: 1/21/00
|
31-20 coots...ECU will give them nore trouble week 2.
Aug 25, 2014, 3:25 PM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [96]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 131
Joined: 2/8/12
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 3:26 PM
|
|
Sc 35 a&m 14
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [25393]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14697
Joined: 11/3/11
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 7:53 PM
|
|
I think ole Spurrier will pull this one out of the bag: SC 31 TAMU 14, mostly with Thompson going airborne.
Following will be a massive influx of chickens onto TigerNet, most of whom will hang around long enough to see the outcome of our game with UGA.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1224]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 982
Joined: 9/30/06
|
TAMU wins, and here's why...
Aug 25, 2014, 8:33 PM
|
|
Because South Carolina is MASSIVELY overrated.
Last season, only 22 points separate their 12-2 record from a 7-6 record (I say 7-6 because I think if they had that record they would not have gotten a bowl invite). They were beaten by 5-7 Tennessee and almost lost to 4-8 Florida. Beat a 2-10 Kentucky team by only 7 points AT HOME.
That was with Shaw and Clowney both on the roster, both of which are gone now.
Their luck runs out this year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [14233]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13983
Joined: 2/8/11
|
Shaw and Clowboy single handily
Aug 25, 2014, 8:41 PM
|
|
won a few games for them by themselves. Also Bruce Ellington was a huge loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3730]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 4857
Joined: 11/4/03
|
Re: South Carolina- Texas A&M Score Predictions for Thursday
Aug 25, 2014, 9:05 PM
|
|
Birds that can't fly - 26
Agnus of Lonely Stars - 30
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 60
| visibility 5,933
|
|
|
50
