Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Reviews of calls. Regular speed or slo-mo.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 4
| visibility 569

Reviews of calls. Regular speed or slo-mo.


Oct 22, 2012, 11:08 AM

There were many close calls reviewed in our Virginia Tech game.

I was wondering, when a review occurs is a reviewer looking at a slow motion film or at regular speed?

IT seems to me that it makes a big difference on how you interpret a call.

Also, in my Own opinion fewer calls are being reversed this year than in prior years.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Reviews of calls. Regular speed or slo-mo.


Oct 22, 2012, 11:10 AM

I wonder the same. I assume they judge them both, but as you said, some plays look way different at regular speed than in slow mo. The Nuk incomplete pass in the endzone is one play that comes to mind.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

COLLEGE: A three-year starter at strong safety for Clemson, finished his career with 234 tackles and 11 interceptions.


They have every feature available, slow mo, frame by frame,


Oct 22, 2012, 11:11 AM

can zoom in, etc.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


They can look at it however they need to make the call


Oct 22, 2012, 11:12 AM

There were a couple of calls in the Miami/FSU and UGA/UK game that I felt for sure they would overturn. I bet Stanford has some feelings about replay officials as well.

It does seem like they are giving more leeway to the call on the field. In the past it seemed like they used the replay to make the call not recognizing what the term "indisputable visual evidence" meant. Now if it isn't 100% obvious, they leave it on the field.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Reviews of calls. Regular speed or slo-mo.


Oct 22, 2012, 11:17 AM

I believe there is some degree of them not wanting to show up the ref's. Also, some calls seem to be the result of going overboard with trying to protect players from injury, i.e. the call saying that Logan Thomas was down, when he may not have been, yet.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 4
| visibility 569
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic