Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Really only two winners in the gun debate
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 344

Really only two winners in the gun debate


Jan 13, 2013, 9:09 PM

The Gun Manufacturers and the NRA, they are getting filthy rich over the scare tactics coming from the right wing. "Quick, buy as many guns as you can before they are taken away." Some of you are eating it up hook line and sinker.

And before you try and tell me that the NRA's responsibility is to protect its members and their right to bear arms, wake up. They protect the gun manufactures and their right to get filthy rich. They only took 200 million in contributions this past year from gun manufactures, 80 went to lobby, errr bribe congress.

So enjoy your delusional fantasies about having an armed stand off with the government. 30 years from now nothing will have changed.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Really only two winners in the gun debate


Jan 13, 2013, 9:11 PM

They're doing something the stimulus couldn't do...stimulate the economy!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Really only two winners in the gun debate


Jan 13, 2013, 9:35 PM

not sure how it is stimulus when the money goes right back to the government in the form of political ads and lobbies.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agree here.


Jan 13, 2013, 9:12 PM

The NRA sucks bawls when it comes to actual gun rights. It was actually against the Heller case at the beginning, and only got on board with it far down the line. If you care about gun rights, there are much better organizations to support. The only reason the NRA is so effective (at what, I don't know -- maybe effective at being noticed) is because of their bankroll. And, this is because of what tbalm wrote above: they make bank off of big scares like this.

I will say they have one helluva range at HQ though. Amazing place.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Misleading, the NRA didn't want to have the case decided


Jan 13, 2013, 10:02 PM

and LOSE, and their assessment of the court (which turned out to be wrong) was that it would lose.

They know that bringing a case and losing is more damaging than not bringing it at all because of setting precedents.

It was strategic not philosophical.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

They were still against it in the beginning.


Jan 13, 2013, 10:12 PM

As I said.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Misleading, the NRA didn't want to have the case decided


Jan 14, 2013, 10:29 AM [ in reply to Misleading, the NRA didn't want to have the case decided ]

The NRA sucks. They fought a grassroots effort here in GA to get state level legislation changed. On the last day of session they even had people lobbying reps to vote no. After it passed they claimed the victory as their own. #### them.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So we would have more gun rights if the NRA didn't exist?


Jan 13, 2013, 9:59 PM

And the quotes coming from people like Feinstein, Biden, and Cuomo are the root of the panic buying, not those exposing the quotes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes, and no.


Jan 13, 2013, 10:00 PM

The NRA is fundraising the hayull out of this.

edit: Let me be clear that this is not singular to just the NRA, but any non-profit advocacy group.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Of course they are, they would be stupid not to. That


Jan 13, 2013, 10:03 PM

doesn't somehow magically make those who support them somehow sheep.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Did I say that?***


Jan 13, 2013, 10:12 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I agree, the NRA sucks.


Jan 13, 2013, 11:14 PM

I prefer NAGR or GOA. NRA sold gun owners out.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

NAGR


Jan 14, 2013, 8:06 AM

lutz

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Who on the right has used a scare tactic?


Jan 14, 2013, 7:57 AM

I'll admit, I've spent more recently on gun stuff... mainly because I've found some good deals. It's easy to see prices on some stuff going through the roof already as well as some stuff being hard to find.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Of course, they're a Washington lobbying organization


Jan 14, 2013, 8:13 AM

Their only purpose is to make firearm and ammunition manufacturers rich.

Sorry, but there's no altruism in the government lobbying business.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Third winner - bullet manufacturers.***


Jan 14, 2013, 11:36 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 344
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic