|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 27, 2012, 9:01 PM
|
|
Today SCU got put on probation for cheating. They may not had to forfeit wins, or miss bowl games, etc, but the fact remains that everything they have done (and it's not much) is tarnished.
Barry Bonds may have hit 73 homeruns in a season, but nobody really cares because he cheated to do it.
In my life time, SCU still has not beaten us twice in a row without cheating. I still think that they are such a pathetic team that they should never beat us three times in a row even if they are cheating, but in a world where everything went their way, it happened. Oh well, maybe one day they can actually do it without cheating, getting caught, and then getting put on probation for it.
Last night I heard chickens getting happy about two of their guys going in the first round, well I was also happy about that. Those are two 1st round guys that are not going to be there in November, while we still have two guys that would had been first rounders had they been eligible or declared that will be on the field in November.
I am honestly not worried about them, and I know today did not satisfy many on this board, but it did me. They have what they got, but everybody knows they HAD to cheat to get it.
|
|
|
|
 |
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 9
Joined: 3/2/12
|
Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 27, 2012, 10:01 PM
|
|
Sammy and who? Serious question, not trolling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11435]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 14500
Joined: 1/2/11
|
something how these trolls come to our board and TD post***
Apr 27, 2012, 10:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 9
Joined: 3/2/12
|
Re: something how these trolls come to our board and TD post***
Apr 27, 2012, 10:28 PM
|
|
dead serious, not sure who else y'all think will be a first rounder and i'm interested. Ellington?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day
Apr 27, 2012, 10:54 PM
[ in reply to something how these trolls come to our board and TD post*** ] |
|
on T-net.
If I knee jerk right now I am deleting my account after ten years, but I will make a decision tomorrow. I am about 75% sure that I will not be here in 24 hours. Congrats mods, you let the coots overrun the place.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [12]
TigerPulse: 25%
Posts: 9
Joined: 3/2/12
|
Re: I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day
Apr 27, 2012, 10:58 PM
|
|
still seriously interested in who the other 1st round draft pick is...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Ask me on the board that I will be paying tomorrow
Apr 27, 2012, 11:00 PM
|
|
Nah, you would be banned there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [135]
TigerPulse: 18%
Posts: 464
Joined: 2/2/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1864]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 919
Joined: 1/12/11
|
Re: I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day
Apr 27, 2012, 11:36 PM
[ in reply to I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day ] |
|
HEY battle Im with you,Either do something bout the coots or I'll go to TCI for free!Come on Meist ,Show some balls!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [46]
TigerPulse: 14%
Posts: 118
Joined: 12/7/11
|
i can't handle reality so i relish in delusions instead***
Apr 27, 2012, 10:40 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [7]
TigerPulse: 18%
Posts: 29
Joined: 10/16/10
|
Re: I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day
Apr 27, 2012, 10:56 PM
|
|
Are we supposed to beg you to stay now? Goodbye.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
We implies it is your board
Apr 27, 2012, 10:57 PM
|
|
Exactly my point. I will not give money to a coot board....
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [72]
TigerPulse: 27%
Posts: 163
Joined: 1/9/07
|
Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 28, 2012, 12:40 AM
|
|
> Today SCU got put on probation for cheating. They may
> not had to forfeit wins, or miss bowl games, etc, but
> the fact remains that everything they have done (and
> it's not much) is tarnished.
>
> Barry Bonds may have hit 73 homeruns in a season, but
> nobody really cares because he cheated to do it.
>
> In my life time, SCU still has not beaten us twice in
> a row without cheating. I still think that they are
> such a pathetic team that they should never beat us
> three times in a row even if they are cheating, but
> in a world where everything went their way, it
> happened. Oh well, maybe one day they can actually do
> it without cheating, getting caught, and then getting
> put on probation for it.
>
> Last night I heard chickens getting happy about two
> of their guys going in the first round, well I was
> also happy about that. Those are two 1st round guys
> that are not going to be there in November, while we
> still have two guys that would had been first
> rounders had they been eligible or declared that will
> be on the field in November.
>
> I am honestly not worried about them, and I know
> today did not satisfy many on this board, but it did
> me. They have what they got, but everybody knows they
> HAD to cheat to get it.
>
>
Your team won a supposed "Title" by cheating. Yet, all you do is celebrate that 1981 title. 150 violations later.. Give me a break. Cast more stones, buddy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2253]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2967
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 28, 2012, 12:59 AM
|
|
You slime sucking can't win anything. Cheated in baseball, basketball and football. Next thing you know you'll! Be juicing the equestrian team like you do you football team. Suck it coot !!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [22965]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 25005
Joined: 6/24/99
|
There was nothing "supposed" about that title
Apr 28, 2012, 1:03 AM
[ in reply to Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong ] |
|
you brainless chickentroll.....Clemson went undefeated---let me translate for you since you've never seen that happen with the cheatin'chickens----undefeated means Clemson beat every team they played (including your chickens--though it was no big deal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3568]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2974
Joined: 6/24/11
|
Re: Re: I hate to say it, but it may be my last full day
Apr 28, 2012, 1:29 AM
|
|
When Deandre Hopkins goes pro he could be a first rd talent if he runs well at his combine. Sammy watkins is gonna be an earyl draft pick. Martavis Bryants size and speed will vault him up in the draft when he comes out. Apparently Scar fans dont think any schools outside the SEC have players that nfl scouts think are 1st rd picks. Granted my examples are not sure fire but at the least those 3 players will go in the top 3 rds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [13]
TigerPulse: 21%
Posts: 33
Joined: 6/3/11
|
Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 28, 2012, 2:32 AM
|
|
What did the kids get a better nights rest at the Whitney the night before the game? Is that why we won?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [107]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 96
Joined: 6/11/11
|
You didn't play. You've never played football in your life.
Apr 28, 2012, 3:00 AM
|
|
Also, to be SCAR you have to absolutely play by the book. No one believes you can have success, so when you don't choke EVERYONE is suspicious. And then to actually cheat during that time period is "living up to expectations" for your ilk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [107]
TigerPulse: 86%
Posts: 96
Joined: 6/11/11
|
Re: You didn't play. You've never played football in your life.
Apr 28, 2012, 3:07 AM
|
|
I guess I'm just saying that it isn't surprising that the NCAA didn't really punish "you" because even they assumed that that's the only way "you" could be relevant. Plus, in cheating, you got beat by 39 in the SEC championship as your best achievement. What should they take back? The UGA wins?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51531]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43078
Joined: 8/10/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freshman [3]
TigerPulse: 47%
Posts: 15
Joined: 10/10/10
|
Re: I think even Clemson fans are looking at the SCU thing wrong
Apr 28, 2012, 10:17 AM
|
|
So probation tarnishes everything accomplished the 3 years prior? hmmmm... let's not go there.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
