Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 15
| visibility 1

Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:01 PM

We have a current #1 ranked, 5-star high school QB coming in hoping to win the starting job.

We have a former #1 ranked, 5-star high school QB hoping to hang on to the starting job.

Now we have a former 5-star QB in his 6th year coming in with no other expectations than to price vide depth and to push the other two to be the best tat they can be.

Is this not about the best situation we could possibly hope for at the QB position?

Dabo rocks!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fire Dabo for...


Jan 18, 2022, 4:03 PM

taking a year to straighten out our QB woes.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Fire Dabo for...


Jan 18, 2022, 4:07 PM

Absolutely! And for playing in the snow like a kid after only winning 10 games. ??

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:07 PM



2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

the tug abides


the QB situation was gonna be fine regardless.......


Jan 18, 2022, 4:14 PM

Wide Receiver is looking bleak

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: the QB situation was gonna be fine regardless.......


Jan 18, 2022, 4:21 PM

Bleak, really? We should have at least 7 - 4 star rated WRs on our roster next year. That's not the greatest lineup compared to some previous years, but far from bleak.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

maybe that's the better way to put it.....I don't currently


Jan 18, 2022, 4:31 PM

see a 2-deep WR on our roster that I'd take over anything we had 2015-2018 era of Clemson football. Hopefully they'll surprise, but a few need to step up to their star rating and be elite for our team and our QBs to have a chance to look good.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: maybe that's the better way to put it.....I don't currently


Jan 18, 2022, 4:47 PM

We need to have some WRs come in and out perform their ranking instead of underperforming them. Been a while since that's happened.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We need better receiver play regardless. I agree!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:28 PM [ in reply to the QB situation was gonna be fine regardless....... ]

Hoping healthier, more experienced, better coached veterans along with highly-ranked newcomers will turn things around.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:15 PM

I see no downside but give TNet some time and I am sure one will be found. <img border=">

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Class of '87


Re: Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:19 PM

IMO, that former five star hoping to hang on to his job is a Five star bust.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great!


Jan 18, 2022, 4:30 PM

I hope you are wrong, sure you do too.

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

the tug abides


You appear to have a lot of company in your opinion. I hope


Jan 18, 2022, 4:31 PM [ in reply to Re: Why the Clemson QB situation for 2022 ... looks great! ]

I hope you’re wrong.

We need DJ to be a viable candidate to start next season. It’s kinda crucial.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tell me your kidding


Jan 18, 2022, 4:37 PM

DJ and Hunter Johnson are 5 stars??? Just bc they were both incorrectly evaluated doesn’t mean they are 5 star.s

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How could you not know this if you follow Clemson football


Jan 18, 2022, 4:57 PM

Yes, they were both 5-stars.

Of course it appears now that they were over-rated.

But, that’s not the point.

If all 5-stars were correctly evaluated, we wouldn’t need to be scrambling now.

They are great for providing depth ... you can’t hold on to three legit 5-stars.

Ask Oklahoma.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Both DJ and Hunter would be rated 3 star on a good day***


Jan 18, 2022, 4:41 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 15
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic