Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2798
Joined: 8/7/17
|
Note on how Clemson's recruiting tends to turn out
emoji_events
[12]
Feb 14, 2022, 11:00 AM
|
|
|
Clemson football communications director Ross Taylor put together this table of recruiting re-rankings and the upward trend you tend to see with the Tigers:
https://twitter.com/ClemsonFBRoss/status/1493238912965357572
|
|
|
 |
Standout [313]
TigerPulse: 69%
Posts: 386
Joined: 6/12/20
|
Re: Note on how Clemson's recruiting tends to turn out
[1]
Feb 14, 2022, 11:19 AM
|
|
|
I'd like to see who continually re-ranked lower
|
|
|
|
 |
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2798
Joined: 8/7/17
|
Re: Note on how Clemson's recruiting tends to turn out
[2]
Feb 14, 2022, 11:37 AM
|
|
|
Miami's pretty comfortably in that group it looks. Double-digit rankings below their initial for the previous two re-rankings and not even in the top-25 for the one before that.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3315]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2274
Joined: 2/15/11
|
What about Georgia?
Feb 14, 2022, 12:15 PM
|
|
|
They always seemed to underachieve over the past 10-15 years relative to their rankings.
|
|
|
|
 |
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2798
Joined: 8/7/17
|
Re: What about Georgia?
Feb 14, 2022, 1:47 PM
|
|
|
They have one of the lowest single-year drops with the 2015 class, with a 19-spot fall to 25th in re-rankings.
Lately, the Athletic has rated two of their three classes from 2016-18 at or above their previous ranking (No. 1/No. 1 for 2018).
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [3315]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2274
Joined: 2/15/11
|
THIS is ALL that MATTERS! How they performed is what counts
[1]
Feb 14, 2022, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
Thanks for sharing this.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-TigerNet [10454]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19823
Joined: 4/24/04
|
What is the methodology used to re-rank?
Feb 14, 2022, 12:22 PM
|
|
|
I don't have a sub to The Athletic any longer.
|
|
|
|
 |
Editor [∞]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2798
Joined: 8/7/17
|
Re: What is the methodology used to re-rank?
[2]
Feb 14, 2022, 1:48 PM
|
|
|
"The scoring system for grading these classes remains the same, a 0-to-5 scale. We’re assessing scholarship players and walk-ons who earned scholarships by what they’ve achieved in four years, not projecting what they could do in the future.
5 points: All-American, award winner, top-50 NFL Draft pick 4: Multiyear starter, all-conference honors 3: One-year starter or key reserve 2: Career backup 0: Minor or no contribution, left the program
Because class sizes vary, we focus on class average (total points divided by total signees) as the measuring stick. A wins bonus is added to each class based on its four-year record. The attrition rate listed counts all signees who left school due to transfer, grad transfer, dismissal, ineligibility or injury."
|
|
|
|
|
|