|
Replies: 48
| visibility 2657
|
Oculus Spirit [44641]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 40097
Joined: 1998
|
|
|
|
 |
Valley Legend [12747]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11224
Joined: 2001
|
Why didn't
1
Aug 9, 2024, 10:58 AM
|
|
the poor victim win their suit on 1st amendment grounds?
Seems like a slam dunk.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [44641]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 40097
Joined: 1998
|
I read articles for you so you don't have to
Aug 9, 2024, 11:02 AM
|
|
Because reading is hard:
“GARM is a small, not-for-profit initiative, and recent allegations that unfortunately misconstrue its purpose and activities have caused a distraction and significantly drained its resources and finances,” the group said in a statement Friday. “GARM therefore is making the difficult decision to discontinue its activities.”
Looks like they didn't have the money to fight back.
Thought you were suddenly a free speech advocate?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [34621]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 11359
Joined: 2015
|
Re: I read articles for you so you don't have to
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:06 AM
|
|
Sounds like LAWFARE lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12747]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11224
Joined: 2001
|
Again, the first amendment protects their free speech.
Aug 9, 2024, 11:12 AM
[ in reply to I read articles for you so you don't have to ] |
|
Seems like the ACLU would be happy to take their case.
Maybe there was some merit to the case against them?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [44641]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 40097
Joined: 1998
|
ACLU wouldn't get involved with a private company
Aug 9, 2024, 11:16 AM
|
|
Nope, no merit. Just a petulant child vowing to destroy advertisers who pulled out because they didn't like his message. So because they don't agree with him and won't give him money, he's going to sue them.
Musk is a giant baby.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12747]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11224
Joined: 2001
|
Right.
Aug 9, 2024, 11:18 AM
|
|
Maybe one of our Tnet attorneys would take their case pro bono, since they are such defenders of freedom.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [35208]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 34180
Joined: 1999
|
Re: Right.
Aug 9, 2024, 12:11 PM
|
|
I'd love to but I'm not admitted in the Northern District of Texas. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35383]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 42251
Joined: 2001
|
Sssshhhhh***
Aug 9, 2024, 12:37 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Clemson Legend [101167]
TigerPulse: 100%
63
Posts: 66669
Joined: 2002
|
I know he said eff the advertisers. But if I'm not mistaken......
Aug 9, 2024, 11:17 AM
|
|
There's nothing compelling ANYONE to advertise on X. It's a choice the advertiser makes, not a requirement Musk demands.
Sounds like they were just some group who conspired to get OTHERS to cut ties. If that's the case, they will just fold and 4 more will pop up. He will end up playing whackamole here until he's broke.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [44641]
TigerPulse: 100%
56
Posts: 40097
Joined: 1998
|
Well, it was something he basically demanded
Aug 9, 2024, 11:19 AM
|
|
He threatened them when they left, and recently said he was declaring war on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12747]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11224
Joined: 2001
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ultimate Tiger [35383]
TigerPulse: 100%
55
Posts: 42251
Joined: 2001
|
"Until he goes broke." Gottam, are people that stupid?***
2
Aug 9, 2024, 12:39 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
I wonder what kind of deal he's working with NASA to get their astronauts back.***
1
Aug 9, 2024, 12:54 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [23178]
TigerPulse: 99%
52
Posts: 31962
Joined: 1998
|
Elon bought twitter so he could lie without filters and fact checks.
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:30 AM
|
|
He seems to have a knack for it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Valley Legend [12747]
TigerPulse: 100%
46
Posts: 11224
Joined: 2001
|
You boys do that
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:31 AM
|
|
for a lot less than $44 billion.
Props to you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
Government surveillance in the US has long passed the $Trillion mark...***
Aug 9, 2024, 11:34 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [22216]
TigerPulse: 100%
52
Posts: 12458
Joined: 2007
|
Re: "Free speech advocate" pitches a tantrum and sues...
3
Aug 9, 2024, 11:44 AM
|
|
GARM may technically be set up as a non-profit, but its members are some of the largest corporations on the planet. They control 90% of global advertising spending. They're shutting down because they think there's at least a decent chance Musk will win in court, not because they can't afford to pay their lawyers to fight him. Companies are allowed to advertise or not advertise wherever they like, but it seems they might not be allowed to collude with their competitors to do so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
GARM was 'plausible deniability', the one step in between... Collusion.***
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:51 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: "Free speech advocate" pitches a tantrum and sues...
2
Aug 9, 2024, 11:47 AM
|
|
It kind of sounds like they were bringing a group of businesses together to conspire against another business that would have produced losses, which would most likely be illegal under numerous laws.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
I posted about GARM about a week ago before Musk announced the suit.
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:55 AM
|
|
He's got a case. Now he just needs to lock it up re the WFA's culpability. Good luck in 'court', though...
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Which laws?***
1
Aug 9, 2024, 6:02 PM
|
|
Antitrust laws related to illegal boycott and conspiracy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
Usually that's applied to cases where a company gains a competitve edge
Aug 9, 2024, 6:58 PM
|
|
not sure I see how that can be applied here, but let's see if Musk makes that case and how he bypasses the fact he told his advertisers to "f#ck off".
But he also filed it in a district with a very sympathetic judge, so it may make it past motions which it probably wouldn't in any other district.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Usually that's applied to cases where a company gains a competitve edge
1
Aug 9, 2024, 7:32 PM
|
|
You basically can't conspire a boycott to put a company out of business or to cause damage.
I'm not saying that is what's going on. I haven't seen a lot of details, but from what I have read Musk may have a legitimate complaint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
I'd like to see the arguments you've seen saying this is legitimate
Aug 9, 2024, 8:01 PM
|
|
From what I've read, for the antitrust boycott law to be in play as you've stated, there needs to be a "competitive advantage" shown by the members creating the boycott, otherwise, it simply falls under a company's right to choose who they do business with. At least, that's my understanding.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: I'd like to see the arguments you've seen saying this is legitimate
Aug 9, 2024, 8:13 PM
|
|
It's the collusion piece that is the issue. Individually, I think you are OK if you are an individual company pulling ads, as long as you are within your contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
Again though, from what I read it needs to give them an advantage
Aug 9, 2024, 9:04 PM
|
|
competitively and commercially.
Musk telling them to "f#ck off", there not being any apparent compulsory action on the part of GARM (they provided a framework for companies to use and members were free to follow or not), Twitter/X was a voluntary member of the group, and there seemed to be no competitive advantage gained by not advertising on Twitter certainly makes it difficult to see the merit of the case, in my opinion.
Interestingly, there's a reason this is coming on the heels of the MAGA-led investigation House investigation, it's brought in the district with a sympathetic judge and GARM has now shut down b/c it's a non-profit with few resources. This is creating a chilling effect in many companies in what certainly feels like collusion by MAGA and Elon (Rumble has also now sued). Kind of ironic, really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Again though, from what I read it needs to give them an advantage
Aug 9, 2024, 9:12 PM
|
|
Your last paragraph sounds a little conspiratorial. Why would that court favor Musk?
It must be the judge they are worried about and not the case.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
"They'll reap what they sowed." SDNY and DC District aren't in play.***
Aug 9, 2024, 9:41 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
Musk is.***
Aug 9, 2024, 10:28 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
He's not listed as plaintiff, X (or Twitter) is....
Aug 9, 2024, 11:05 PM
|
|
Which is still a California company (and GARM isn't located in Texas) plus Elon lives in the Southern District.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: It sounds conspiratorial, because it is
Aug 9, 2024, 11:06 PM
[ in reply to Re: It sounds conspiratorial, because it is ] |
|
But hey, maybe this organization wasn't trying to get companies to collude to get companies to punish Musk.
You may be right.
I'll tell you this, I appreciate this type of debate on this board from you than, "yous a dummy, yous uh idiot magat #######" type of thing. Don't mind a bit of smart smart azzery, but that other stuff gets old.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [18256]
TigerPulse: 100%
51
Posts: 30396
Joined: 2006
|
Very much agree which is why I will engage with you over some others
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:11 PM
|
|
and I'm not discounting that I could very well be wrong, it wouldn't be the first time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [27364]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 14069
Joined: 2014
|
Re: Very much agree which is why I will engage with you over some others
1
Aug 9, 2024, 11:45 PM
|
|
Ha! Yeah me too
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14975]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
Posts: 15909
Joined: 2015
|
How do you feel about gag orders?***
Aug 9, 2024, 12:05 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Conqueror [12000]
TigerPulse: 100%
45
Posts: 15919
Joined: 2010
|
Awesome victory! GARM, ADL, SPCL, and others are enemies of free speech.***
1
Aug 9, 2024, 1:52 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Phenom [14388]
TigerPulse: 100%
48
|
Re: "Free speech advocate" pitches a tantrum and sues...
Aug 9, 2024, 5:31 PM
|
|
Can you define collusion?
Collusion is a non-competitive, secret, and sometimes illegal agreement between rivals that attempts to disrupt the market's equilibrium.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13118]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
I don't know about this....
4
Aug 9, 2024, 5:33 PM
|
|
From Wikipedia: "In 2019, WFA formed the Global Alliance for Responsible Media (GARM), a global cross-industry alliance which aims to improve digital safety and eliminate harmful online content. GARM is made up of advertisers, agencies, media companies, platforms and industry organisations and is part of the World Economic Forum's Platform for Shaping the Future of Media, Entertainment and Culture."
From the World Economic Forum site:
The project focuses on addressing the following challenges:
Hate speech
Bullying
Disinformation
Use of personal data
Child exploitation
The goal is to accelerate and advance the role that advertisers can play in collectively pushing to improve the safety of online environments. This alliance drives uncommon collaboration to improve the safety, trustworthiness, and sustainability of media.
https://www.weforum.org/projects/global-alliance-for-responsible-media-garm/
GARM may have been a "small non-profit" but it appears they didn't lack the big horses backing their play. Speaking of their play - GARM was specifically designed to use their access to big money advertisers to censor speech that GARM (or whoever was pulling their strings) deemed "unsafe".
Seems to me GARM's whole purpose was to censor free speech based on their own criteria. I don't want Government censoring speech nor do I want some WEF friendly "non-profit" doing it either. So... good on X for going after these guys.
Meh... Don't worry - I'm sure the world's thought police will just prop up another non-profit down the road under some new name and will continue the work of GARM...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
Globalist Central... They finance US traditional media and are now migrating.***
1
Aug 10, 2024, 6:04 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Campus Hero [13118]
TigerPulse: 100%
47
|
So after poking around the GARM stuff it becomes very clear that GARM
3
Aug 10, 2024, 9:38 AM
|
|
was not some little powerless non-profit getting beat up by the big bad Elon Musk and Rumble. Quite the contrary after seeing the stuff the House Judiciary was finding on them.
Looks like the head dude of GARM - Rob Rackowitz is a leftist, self-righteous choad. Dude seemed to believe that he and his organization would be the self-appointed policing arbiters of truth, misinformation, and hate speech throughout media. It's hard for me to imagine the arrogance it takes to lead that kind of organization.
Apparently GARM, through their connection(s) and close relationship with the World Federation of Advertisers, sought to inflict their media content judgements (i.e. censorship) by leveraging the WFA's ad and media monetizing dollars against media platforms. Since the WFA constitutes about 90% of all ad/monetizing dollars in media this is not some small mouse barking at a bunch of media company lions. GARM sought to get Company's like Spotify, "X", Facebook etc... to implement censoring policies that aligned with GARM's judgements or risk losing ad/monetizing dollars from members of the WFA. That's a pretty potent threat from a small non-profit...
GARM isn't the public's chosen "media police" for social media, but a group of self-appointed leftist "Karens", backed by the WEF who took it upon themselves to be the arbiters of what the public can see, read, and ultimately think. Simply put - GARM is nothing but a censorship organization who uses threat of financial loss to media Company's as a means to implement their censorship. Of course GARM wants to justify their censorship in a false altruistic cloak of stopping misinformation and hate speech but no matter how one slices it - GARM's purpose was censorship.
As I said earlier - I don't want the Government censoring free speech and I darn sure don't want a group of WEF sponsored choads using the advertising back doors of their leftist cancel culture to censor people/platforms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [5682]
TigerPulse: 100%
38
|
Re: So after poking around the GARM stuff it becomes very clear that GARM
Aug 11, 2024, 8:54 AM
|
|
I'm sure if a bunch of right wing religious types were somehow able to manipulate every major advertiser on the planet into not advertising anywhere that didn't support 100% of their views, that the leftist trash on this board (and elsewhere) would meekly accept that reality and never even consider the justice system as a recourse. We all know how reluctant leftists are to sue anyone at the drop of a hat any time they feel repressed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Pro [791]
TigerPulse: 83%
21
|
Re: "Free speech advocate" pitches a tantrum and sues...
1
Aug 11, 2024, 4:16 AM
|
|
awwww...sucks for them
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clemson Icon [26896]
TigerPulse: 100%
53
Posts: 45667
Joined: 2010
|
Still checking those notes...? Try flash paper next time.***
Aug 11, 2024, 7:58 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 48
| visibility 2657
|
|
|
50
">
