Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 18
| visibility 1

UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 1:13 AM

Asking for a friend...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 6:39 AM

I won't lie to you, that would be tempting. Three NCs are a lot, especially when the last one was so long ago. That doesn't seem to be enough for Clemson fans who seem quite desperate to beat UGA, so I'll assume it wouldn't be enough for UGA. So tell your friend we'll hold off on the natty and for the moment stick with the complete domination of Clemson on the field.

Thanks for asking, though.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 6:53 AM

Clemson hasn’t been desperate for anything in a long time, except for some additional trophy case space.

You’re right. You keep yours and we’ll keep ours.

Zip that up, your BS is showing… GO TIGERS

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 9:10 AM [ in reply to Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys? ]

I won’t go into my preference of the Natty’s vs series. However, I went and looked at the series results and was surprised how we dominated the first 10, going 7-3. UGa scored 65 total points across those 10 games with 5 shutouts. Since, it has been pretty bleak, 11-39-2, ooofffff.

Objectively, UGa should be the better program. The state has more talent, more people, and the program has much more conference and booster money. It really is a testament to Dabo that we have been the better program in the CFP era.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


If you look further


Jun 20, 2021, 11:11 AM

UGA dominates the series 42-18-4, the 42
win total also being the # of the 64 games
that were played in the state of Georgia.
UGA was like a lot of schools that didn't
like to travel to "little ol Clemson" since
it was in the middle of nowhere with only 2
lane Hwy 93 to get there (this was GaTech's
issue also). Coach Howard pushed to get Hwy
123 built in the 60s and previously reluctant
teams were more open to home and home series.

Not saying the series record would have been
different and we've dominated SC regardless,
but who knows.

http://www.winsipedia.com/games/clemson/vs/georgia


2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: I posted something similar above**


Jun 20, 2021, 11:13 AM

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 9:13 AM [ in reply to Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys? ]

1980
I was a junior at Clemson.
John Lennon was shot and killed.
Rubix cube was invented.
Miracle on ice happened. (That makes 2 sports shockers to go with UGA.)
Mount St. Helens erupts.
Post it notes was inv

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 9:17 AM

Oops, not finished.
Post it notes invented.
Virtually all the current Ga players fathers were just being born.
Gas price was 1.19
Movies cost 2.50

Ahhh the good old days. UGA remembers them well.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 10:29 AM

You forgot one. Ga Tech still had a Natty to win in 1990.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 3:48 PM [ in reply to Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys? ]

Dallas (Who Shot JR?) and Dukes of Hazard were the top 2 TV programs that year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I think most Jawja fans would surrender that series lead and


Jun 20, 2021, 11:27 AM [ in reply to Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys? ]

a left gonadical, for three Nattys.

You have to remember, they haven't been able to get even ONE (Natty) on their own in the last 41 years. :)

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 11:48 AM

gleaner63 said:

Asking for a friend...


They would trade all 3 of their remaining teeth for three nattys!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

As for me, no


Jun 20, 2021, 2:07 PM

Too many good memories of Georgia and Clemson games through the years!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: As for me, no


Jun 20, 2021, 9:55 PM

This has to be a lie. What does a series lead mean. National Titles are the only thing people care about. Example we were 0-59 at UNC. We won. It was great. I'd go 0-100 if we got one title.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: As for me, no


Jun 21, 2021, 4:53 PM

Pizzy said:

National Titles are the only thing people care about.


I'm not so sure. I mean, yeah I'd like to have won a NC, but it's certainly not "the only thing people care about". I care about my wallet and since about 1984 I've gone anywhere from moderate to heavy on every game we've played y'all except 1990 and 2002. Yeah, I got burned in '86 & '13, but cashed in on all the others. I'm sure I'm not the only one who cares about that (including, I'd guess, some Clemson big spenders).
Somebody brought up georgia freaking tech. Are you kidding me? Most fans of outside programs don't even know they shared a NC that year. They stunk it up two years before that and stunk it up two years afterwards. Their fan base is one of the most miserable and unenthusiastic in all of football.
There is something to be said for winning over the long haul, and while not having that magical season where everything - including a healthy dose of luck (which Clemson has certainly had at times) - falls into place, Georgia has done just that.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: As for me, no


Jun 21, 2021, 6:41 PM

Valid points. Our titles has paid off for me pretty well. Some would call that a win win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: As for me, no


Jun 20, 2021, 9:56 PM [ in reply to As for me, no ]

Also I actually enjoy most of your posts

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: UGA: would you trade Clemson series lead for 3 FB nattys?


Jun 20, 2021, 4:00 PM

No chance. Its all about National Titles.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's funny seeing UGA fans attempt to justify the


Jun 21, 2021, 5:12 PM

series record over national titles. Of course they would trade for our titles.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 18
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic