Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Turnovers are not an excuse
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 897

Turnovers are not an excuse


Dec 2, 2013, 10:39 AM

It is a fact that the game would have had a different ending if their would have not been turnovers...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

how do you know?***


Dec 2, 2013, 10:40 AM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


So if it's a fact that the game would have


Dec 2, 2013, 10:41 AM

had a different outcome if there were no turnovers, then turnovers ARE an excuse?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

null


Re: Turnovers are not an excuse


Dec 2, 2013, 10:42 AM

Williams jumping offsides on fourth down changed the whole game. We had the score tied and had the momentum. FINALLY got a third-down stop, and then that? It was over right then.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Especially the unforced ones that came at the worst times


Dec 2, 2013, 10:42 AM

The Sammy INT was dumb all around. There is no need to get cute at that point when you take the opening drive and have them on their heels.

The first muffed punt was painful. No reason at all for Braynt to be there to get in Humph's way.

Tajh's fumble was just a good play by SC's D. He was doing his best to get more yards and they stripped him. However the D came out and stuffed them and then Humph misses on a punt and that's all on him.

Tajh's INTs came because we had little time, were behind two scores and we pressing. When that happens teams are fully content to drop 8-9 into coverage and wait for a mistake.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

whether we had 6 or 53 turnovers is irrelevant...


Dec 2, 2013, 10:52 AM

when you've lost 5 straight. You give up the luxury of the "aw shucks, bad game."

Sorry, no room for anything other than a win. Incompetence is showing.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-franc1968.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What the heck does that mean?


Dec 2, 2013, 11:05 AM

"Turnovers are not an excuse . . . It is a fact that the game would have had a different ending if their would have not been turnovers... "

Yes, I think there would have been a different ending if there had not been any turnovers. It looks like you are showing how turnovers are an excuse.

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Re: Turnovers are not an excuse


Dec 2, 2013, 11:10 AM

Did not help thats for sure, but Connor Shaw was the difference maker, he simply killed us period, end of report.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 7
| visibility 897
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...138 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic