Re: Trump spoke at a religious conservative event last night.

Okay, I'll respond.

It's not even close...suck on these facts:
These are facts?

You are good with Bill Clinton staying in office after abusing an intern and getting a blow job in the oval office (how about if Monica is your daughter?)
I could care less about the BJ. I'm a lot more concerned with the incessant lying under oath. He should have been gone.

You are good with a sitting secretary of state creating her own DIY email server and using it exclusively, including to send/receive Top Secret data/information, while the Clinton foundation collects 100s of millions of dollars (horribly illegal but you don't care)
Okay, that's a two-parter. First off...no, I'm not okay with that. She actually got hacked by a Romanian taxi driver in front of a reporter, her system was that insecure. But what's your proposed penalty? Impeachment? Again, I'm fine with that. But let's be consistent. Because Trump repeatedly yacked away on an unsecured phone, and Ivanka Trump herself used unsecured e-mail to pass around classified data. Do you care?

You are okay with Joe Biden lying to say Trump could have taken actions to save every life lost to COVID (he said it, you believed it, you voted for him)
Did he say exactly that? I think he proclaimed something along the lines of "we'll stop COVID in this country", which he couldn't really deliver. Then again, the biggest reason he couldn't really deliver was all the anti-vax hysteria being drummed up specifically by his biggest enemies in the media at Fox News, OAN, and Newsmax.

You are okay with Joe Biden lying to say he will shut down the virus and not the economy (he did the opposite)
Well, I don't think anybody's okay with the economy. Obviously it starts with the supply chain and energy costs. So what's YOUR plan again...that does not involve just putting us back into the hip pocket of Big Oil unto infinity while the planet (literally) catches fire around us? Because you're having to squint harder and hard to ignore all those ever-growing wildfires out West, the fact that Lake Mead's pretty much empty, heat waves are getting more severe, and Yellowstone's about to fall into a giant flood.

You are okay with your government using a corrupt DOJ and congress to create a lie (Steele Dossier) and attempt to take down the President of the United States
The Steele Dossier wasn't created by either the DOJ or congress, it was oppo research created by Fusion GPS, a K-street firm that specializes in generating dirt for political campaigns. We had ourselves quite a conversation about this awhile back, where I showed you the FISA documents that only peripherally mentioned the dossier as a cause for those warrants. As ever, you've just edited those facts right out of your memory. Shall I necro that thread and remind you?

You are okay with the MSM and the POTUS lying to tell everyone HB's laptop is Russian Disinformation when they all knew that was a lie (and now we all know it was a lie)
There's still a lot that doesn't pass the smell test about that laptop and you know it. At the very least you know its chain of custody was so messed up it's completely useless as a piece of evidence though some of the E-mails on it may lead to real, actually provable threads that could get Hunter Biden in the soup. But it looked and smelled at the very least like a deliberately orchestrated and timed Fox News October Surprise because that's exactly what it was. No, I could care less about the laptop, though I think if it leads to threads deleterious to Hunter Biden the DOJ should absolutely pursue them.

But I care about that as much as I would care about, say, Tiffany Trump getting busted for embezzlement. It'd be momentarily embarrassing for about two seconds to Donald, but if he didn't have a hand in it that's Tiffany's deal and the consequences would be on her own head...because she wasn't part of his administration.

Compared to:
Trump talked about grabbing a pu$$y. Trump called the media a bunch of liars. Trump believes the 2020 election was rigged.
That does not even begin to summate the issues regarding the Trump administration or 1/6...and you know it.

RememberTheDanny

110%er [7128]

TigerPulse: 96%

Posts: 9690

Joined: 10/6/21

Re: How is the DOJ going after concerned parents of public school students?***

Jun 19, 2022, 10:12 PM

Here ya go ... AMAC - May 13, 2022

Despite the denials of Attorney General Merrick Garland, courtesy of two whistleblowers, we now know the Department of Justice has indeed been investigating parents who dare to defend their families and children by engaging with their local school boards. Moreover, the DOJ is using funding designated for counterterrorism to ‘investigate’ these American moms and dads.

All of this stems from the shocking revelation last year that the National School Board Association (NSBA) worked with the Department of Education and Biden’s White House to craft a letter comparing protesting parents to domestic terrorists. That letter was then sent to Attorney General Garland, asking the DOJ to consider using the Patriot Act against parents confronting school boards about woke policies in the curriculum.

Fox reports, “Five days later, the DOJ issued a memo directing the FBI to investigate threats to school boards. The memo highlighted the FBI’s National Threat Operations Center [which is] likened to a ‘snitch-line’ for tips about parents at school board meetings.”

This ‘terrorism’ link was necessary to allow federal law enforcement to swoop in on local jurisdictions which are less inclined to treat their citizens like terrorists or criminals for participating in their local government. Normally, if someone is threatened, be it an average citizen or a local elected official, the local police department handles it.

But what local cops won’t do, thank goodness, is act as the federal Thought Police targeting individuals for daring to challenge Democrat Party politics. Hence, Biden’s DOJ needed an excuse to make it of federal interest, ergo, tagging parents as potential terrorists.

Yes, it is still as insane today as when first exposed.

After considerable backlash, the NSBA eventually apologized for their characterization of parents as terrorists, and AG Garland assured the House Judiciary Committee last year that he would never subject parents to DOJ scrutiny for speaking up at school board meetings. He said, in part: “I do not believe that parents who testify, speak, argue with, complain about school boards and schools should be classified as domestic terrorists or any kind of criminals…I do not think that parents getting angry at school boards, for whatever reason, constitute domestic terrorism. It’s not even a close question.”

And yet, it appears AG Garland wasn’t being completely forthright.

In a May 11, 2022 letter to the attorney general, Republican Reps. Jim Jordan and Mike Johnson reveal they have received information from whistleblowers indicating the DOJ is actually investigating and contacting parents for their comments at school board meetings. They write:

“We have learned from brave whistleblowers that the FBI has opened investigations with the EDUOFFICIALS threat tag in almost every region of the country and relating to all types of educational settings. The information we have received shows how, as a direct result of your directive, federal law enforcement is using counterterrorism resources to investigate protected First Amendment activity…”

They go on to describe agents from an FBI Field office interviewing a mom “for allegedly telling a local school board “we are coming for you.” The complaint, which came into the FBI through the National Threat Operations Center snitch-line, alleged that the mom was a threat because she belonged to a “right-wing mom’s group” known as ‘Moms for Liberty’ and because she ‘is a gun owner.’ She explained, of course, that she was speaking about using the electoral process.

In another case, they describe the FBI initiating an investigation against locally elected Republican officials “over allegations from a state Democratic party official that the Republicans ‘incited violence’ by expressing public displeasure with school districts’ vaccine mandates,” which also came through the ‘snitch line.’

In the letter to AG Garland, Reps Jordan and Johnson reveal more details they received from the whistleblowers:

“This whistleblower information is startling. You have subjected these moms and dads to the opening of an FBI investigation about them, the establishment of an FBI case file that includes their political views, and the application of a “threat tag” to their names as a direct result of the exercise of their fundamental constitutional right to speak and advocate for their children. This information is evidence of how the Biden Administration is using federal law enforcement, including counterterrorism resources, to investigate concerned parents for protected First Amendment activity.”

The whistleblowers report more than two dozen parents that have been “tagged” by the FBI with counterterrorism tools being used against them.

Please make no mistake: all of this is meant to frighten everyone from feeling safe to exercise their First Amendment rights and to retreat from challenging the Democratic Party agenda.

While the FBI and DOJ are labeling American parents as terrorists and spending resources on investigating and tracking them, our federal law enforcement seems to have little interest in the number of actual terrorists coming over our southern border. Since Biden’s presidency, dozens of people on the terrorist watch list have been apprehended crossing the chaotic southern border. Considering our problem is the million-plus “getaways,” how many real terrorists have actually made it through?

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

Trump spoke at a religious conservative event last night.