Re: To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's

Oculus Spirit [97649]

TigerPulse: 100%

Posts: 64785

Joined: 7/13/02

To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's

May 10, 2021, 9:42 AM

ever posted.

Way I see it, it's an admission by China by way of omission. It took the world all of what, two months, if that, to trace swine flu in 2009 to two pig farms in Veracruz, Mexico. They found the original pigs who got the virus, tested the pigs, and confirmed the first human transmission happened on those pig farms and that virus jumped from pigs to humans right there.

The wet market BS really gave it away. They closed it, sent everyone home, INCLUDING the animals. None were tested? ### kind of dumbassery is that? They then went in and tested surfaces in the place and found the virus, then concluded it started there. Yet they DID NOT TEST THE FREAKING ANIMALS when it would have been easiest to find the host. But that really wasn't the biggest red flag. The Lancet released a study a few months into the outbreak and it traced the earliest cases of the virus back to December 1st. The first 3-4 people who contracted covid in China, in EARLY December 2019, had NO CONTACT with the market in Wuhan. Then China later concluded, after that study was released, it didn't start in the freaking market.

Nope, case 1 was likely a worker at some lab, or was associated with some lab. They probably quarantined their whole family and everyone they came in contact with. Then waited, and someone else popped up with it. They probably locked them away as well, and their families. Then it spread to another person, and another, all the while they're keeping them quarantined. This could have gone on for months. But when it hit that market, that was the first "super spreader" event, and the cat was out of the bag then.

Just my guess. Still a guess, but China has done nothing to disprove a lab leak theory, at all. Probably because they can't. Their original lie was a lie, and that's about all we know. Don't really need to know any more. They had already leaked SARS once, messing around with it in a lab. They managed to contain that outbreak to like 20 people. China also knew early on a lot about the virus. more than could be known as quickly as they published studies. Things the CDC has only now confirmed through independent studies. Nope, this had been a known virus for a while, and China had been studying it for a while before Wuhan happened. Trump was briefed around Thanksgiving of 2019 about a new virus emerging in China during one of the many daily intelligence briefings he ignored. Blood samples from Italy had covid antibodies in September of 2019. Here in the US we identified antibodies in Red Cross blood samples from early December 2019 in nine states. And of those positives, only 3% reported traveling within 28 days of the blood sample being taken, meaning they acquired the virus locally in the US a month before probably in November. So much behavior similar to influenza. Worse, but the way the virus acts, spreads, and evolves is very similar.

And Sars is a VERY poor candidate among viruses to even attempt to "weaponize".

flag link

military_tech

thumb_down

thumb_up

right about that, and still think Trump's a populist/narcissist/opportunist.

Just tossing that out there.

I've always held the possibility and probability it was a leak from a lab. Now I never went full bioweapon because that's not a likely scenario. But a accidental lab leak is absolutely possible, if not probable. And if it wasn't a lab leak, there's a LOT China could have done to refute that theory, and they haven't. Which is why it's probable in my book. Could be they were trying to study SARS to figure out what mutations could make it a pandemic, ostensibly to prevent one. And they found it. Doesn't have to be weapons-related. And it leaked. We are doing this with Ebola right now as well. What mutations could make Ebola more transmissible? Why did many outbreaks not spread in Africa, but then that one a few years ago did? There's legit scientific value in studying this, but it's playing with fire and probably should NOT be done anywhere, much less in a place with just enough knowledge to be dangerous, and not enough wisdom to leave SARS the #### alone.

Chinese book foreshadows COVID

TBalm already figured out the "delivery system"

It's the cure. Airborne HCQ.***

Re: Chinese book foreshadows COVID

To his credit, this may be the first reputable link he's