Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 30
| visibility 1

TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years

5

Jan 16, 2023, 12:05 PM

 
Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 12:15 PM

Interesting choice of words for the headline...

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years

1

Jan 16, 2023, 12:34 PM

Clemson, Miami, and Virginia are the only three ranked teams. I never thought I'd see the day that ACC football was tougher than ACC basketball.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

bowlhunter on Dabo Swinney: “His only problem is he has to deal with turd Keller questioning every move he makes.”


Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 12:35 PM

Virginia is also ranked (the highest of the 3)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years

1
1

Jan 16, 2023, 12:40 PM

Changed it completely missed UVA.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

bowlhunter on Dabo Swinney: “His only problem is he has to deal with turd Keller questioning every move he makes.”


We did move up 7 spots!


Jan 16, 2023, 12:49 PM

That's more than any other team. Btw the Net is not based on any of the polls. It is an entity of it's own.So polls don't mean much.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We did move up 7 spots!

1

Jan 16, 2023, 12:52 PM

Our Net ranking is 49th. That sucks...We just have to keep winning.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sixth in Acc in Net rankings??


Jan 16, 2023, 1:00 PM

Now that I have done a little research I am even more confused. Undefeated in Acc but 6th in Net and it's through 1/15

UVA - 15th
Duke -25th
NC State -29th
UNC- 33rd
Canes - 39th
Tigers-49th

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The coot and Loyola Chicago games are getting all the respect they deserve.

1

Jan 16, 2023, 1:04 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Re: The coot and Loyola Chicago games are getting all the respect they deserve.


Jan 16, 2023, 1:15 PM

"Quad 4 losses: the stink that keeps on stinking."

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lucky Johnson


Re: We did move up 7 spots!


Jan 16, 2023, 1:11 PM [ in reply to We did move up 7 spots! ]

Here’s how teams in last week’s AP Top 25 (+ teams getting votes) did last week:

Top 25
1. Houston: 17-1 (1-0)
2. Kansas: 16-1 (2-0)
3. Purdue: 16-1 (1-0)
4. Alabama: 15-2 (2-0)
5. Tennessee: 14-3 (1-1)
6. UConn: 15-4 (0-2)
7. UCLA: 16-2 (2-0)
8. Gonzaga: 16-3 (2-0)
9. Arizona: 15-3 (1-1)
10. Texas: 15-2 (2-0)
11. Kansas State: 15-2 (1-1)
12. Xavier: 15-3 (2-0)
13. Virginia: 15-3 (2-0)
14. Iowa State: 13-3 (1-1)
15. Arkansas: 12-5 (0-2)
16. Miami: 14-3 (1-1)
17. TCU: 13-3 (1-1)
18. Wisconsin: 11-5 (0-2)
19. Providence: 14-4 (0-1)
20. Missouri: 13-4 (0-2)
21. Auburn: 14-3 (1-0)
22. Charleston: 16-1 (2-0)
23. San Diego State: 13-4 (0-1)
24. Duke: 13-5 (1-1)
25. Marquette: 14-5 (1-1)
26. Baylor: 12-5 (1-0)
27. Clemson: 15-3 (2-0)
28. Florida Atlantic: 16-1 (2-0)
29. Indiana: 11-6 (1-1)
30. St. Mary’s: 16-4 (2-0)
31. Michigan State: 12-5 (1-1)
32. Northwestern: 12-5 (0-2)
33. Illinois: 12-5 (2-0)
34. Mississippi: 12-5 (0-2)
35. Rutgers: 13-5 (2-0)
36. Ohio State: 10-7 (0-2)
37. Creighton: 10-8 (1-1)
38. North Carolina: 12-6 (1-1)
39. NC State: 14-4 (1-0)
40. LSU: 12-5 (0-2)
41. Pittsburgh: 12-6 (1-1)
42. New Mexico: 16-2 (2-0)
43. Nevada: 15-4 (1-1)

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We did move up 7 spots!

1

Jan 16, 2023, 1:11 PM [ in reply to We did move up 7 spots! ]

Here’s how teams in last week’s AP Top 25 (+ teams getting votes) did last week:

Top 25
1. Houston: 17-1 (1-0)
2. Kansas: 16-1 (2-0)
3. Purdue: 16-1 (1-0)
4. Alabama: 15-2 (2-0)
5. Tennessee: 14-3 (1-1)
6. UConn: 15-4 (0-2)
7. UCLA: 16-2 (2-0)
8. Gonzaga: 16-3 (2-0)
9. Arizona: 15-3 (1-1)
10. Texas: 15-2 (2-0)
11. Kansas State: 15-2 (1-1)
12. Xavier: 15-3 (2-0)
13. Virginia: 15-3 (2-0)
14. Iowa State: 13-3 (1-1)
15. Arkansas: 12-5 (0-2)
16. Miami: 14-3 (1-1)
17. TCU: 13-3 (1-1)
18. Wisconsin: 11-5 (0-2)
19. Providence: 14-4 (0-1)
20. Missouri: 13-4 (0-2)
21. Auburn: 14-3 (1-0)
22. Charleston: 16-1 (2-0)
23. San Diego State: 13-4 (0-1)
24. Duke: 13-5 (1-1)
25. Marquette: 14-5 (1-1)
26. Baylor: 12-5 (1-0)
27. Clemson: 15-3 (2-0)
28. Florida Atlantic: 16-1 (2-0)
29. Indiana: 11-6 (1-1)
30. St. Mary’s: 16-4 (2-0)
31. Michigan State: 12-5 (1-1)
32. Northwestern: 12-5 (0-2)
33. Illinois: 12-5 (2-0)
34. Mississippi: 12-5 (0-2)
35. Rutgers: 13-5 (2-0)
36. Ohio State: 10-7 (0-2)
37. Creighton: 10-8 (1-1)
38. North Carolina: 12-6 (1-1)
39. NC State: 14-4 (1-0)
40. LSU: 12-5 (0-2)
41. Pittsburgh: 12-6 (1-1)
42. New Mexico: 16-2 (2-0)
43. Nevada: 15-4 (1-1)

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

2 words..No Respect***


Jan 16, 2023, 12:35 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2 words..No Respect***

1

Jan 16, 2023, 12:38 PM

None earned, none given... a victim of our own circumstances.

What I mean by this is it is kind of like when the football team had the label of "Clemsoning." The narrative based on a lot of past history is that Clemson BB will waste away prosperity. Until we prove otherwise we won't get the respect we deserve.


Message was edited by: slwcu79®


2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 2 words..No Respect***


Jan 16, 2023, 1:17 PM

Evidenced by the Q4 losses and the weak schedule so far outside the ACC (and partially within it). We could not know when we scheduled some of these games that the teams would be Q4 teams, but losing to two of them hurts, a lot.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We're still 52nd in KenPom as well


Jan 16, 2023, 2:31 PM [ in reply to 2 words..No Respect*** ]

The early OOC games cost us again. One thing that's been incredibly consistent during Brad's tenure is taking 2-3 bad OOC losses every year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: We're still 52nd in KenPom as well


Jan 16, 2023, 2:42 PM


The early OOC games cost us again. One thing that's been incredibly consistent during Brad's tenure is taking 2-3 bad OOC losses every year.



This is not close to true.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Two years!!!


Jan 16, 2023, 12:54 PM

Wow... I really didn't realize it had been 2 years since we were ranked in the top 25. Let's hope we can stay there now and continue to move even higher.
Go Tigers!!! Beat Wake!!!

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"If a pig had a better personality, he would cease to be a filthy animal."


Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 1:02 PM

Hopefully our team can keep building on this momentum and make this a year we will never forget.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Looks to me like CBS has us as an 8th seed***


Jan 16, 2023, 1:02 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge.

1

Jan 16, 2023, 2:10 PM

I believe that more than makes up for the two Quad 4 losses, especially since they were early in the season and are clearly outliers.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Maybe outliers on this year's resume, but hardly outliers


Jan 16, 2023, 2:32 PM

for Brad. We take 2-3 bad OOC losses every year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge.

1

Jan 16, 2023, 2:40 PM [ in reply to Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge. ]

There are only 3 schools ahead of Clemson that have a better winning percentage against Quad 1 teams & that’s Purdue (6-1), Kansas (6-1), & Miami (5-1). Kansas State has the same record (4-1). On the flip side, there’s only 1 school that’s lost 2 games against Quad 4 teams (Utah State at 3-2). Utah State is 34th in NET (Clemson 49th) & they’re 0-2 against Quad 1 teams, so that shows how much losing to SCAR & Loyola (Chicago) is weighing us down.

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge.


Jan 16, 2023, 2:53 PM

Here’s what’s left in the regular season:

@ WF (75) —> Quad 1
vs VT (58) —> Quad 2
vs GT (157) —> Quad 3
@ FSU (228) —> Quad 3
@ BC (226) —> Quad 3
vs MIA (39) —> Quad 2
@ UNC (33) —> Quad 1
vs FSU (228) —> Quad 4
@ LOU (337) —> Quad 4
vs SYR (114) —> Quad 3
@ NCST (29) —> Quad 1
@ UVA (15) —> Quad 1
vs ND (162) —> Quad 4

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge.


Jan 16, 2023, 4:47 PM [ in reply to Our 4-1 record in Quad 1 games is huge. ]

I don't often agree with JK but I agree on this one. Keep winning and the impact of those Q4 losses will continue to fade.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Dabo crushed my soul." --- Classof09


Well that did it. Jinxed us. Bet the farm on Wake.


Jan 16, 2023, 2:12 PM

Just kidding. Go Tigers!

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 4:26 PM

The kiss of death!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 4:27 PM

The kiss of death!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: TNET: Clemson men's basketball ranked for first time in two years


Jan 16, 2023, 4:30 PM

Look, we have not played a ranked team, lost to an 8-9 South Carolina and a bottom of their league 6-11 Loyola Chicago so I am just happy we are ranked. It gets way tougher from here but we are playing well for sure.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's been so long since we were ranked that the AP

1

Jan 16, 2023, 4:45 PM

doesn't even have a logo for us.

https://apnews.com/hub/ap-top-25-college-basketball-poll


SMH

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Dabo crushed my soul." --- Classof09


That brain dead BPI algorithm …

1

Jan 16, 2023, 7:40 PM

Does not take into account WHEN a bad loss occurred. If a bad loss occurs very early in the season, it should not count much vs a late season bad loss. Early season is essentially, figuring things out time.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 30
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic