Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Text from Rick Perry to Mark Meadows
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 7
| visibility 560

Text from Rick Perry to Mark Meadows


Dec 17, 2021, 10:35 PM

on 11/4/20 ……
“HERE's an AGRESSIVE (sic) STRATEGY: Why can t (sic) the states of GA NC PENN and other R controlled state houses declare this is BS (where conflicts and election not called that night) and just send their own electors to vote and have it go to the SCOTUS."

Perry and other trumpets wanted Republican-dominated state legislatures not even to wait to see who had won the election—none of those states had been called by November 4—but simply to ignore the will of the voters, choose their own electors, and hope that the Supreme Court would hand the election to Trump as he had been saying for weeks it would.

These guys are scumbags. They are not Republican and they are not conservative. They are un-American criminal scum bags. Hope they get an opportunity to spoon with Roger Stone.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 17, 2021, 10:45 PM

But not as aggressive as what actually happened.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 17, 2021, 11:02 PM

Agreed, not as aggressive / violent physically. However both strategies intended to discard votes and let the election be decided by a handful of individuals. Disgraceful.

Would love to hear trump supporters justify this strategy.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 18, 2021, 9:13 AM

What he was asking for, is 100% protected by the constitution. Anyone else following the law you want to send to hell today?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 18, 2021, 11:30 PM

Wrong, not protected by the constitution.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 18, 2021, 9:20 AM [ in reply to Re: That would certainly be aggressive ]

Whatever.

What I would rather you spend time on is why Hillary Clinton got away with having the geek squad set up a DIY email server which was littered with Russian/Chinese data exfiltration cyber threats (APTs) while she was one of the top political figures in the country and at the same time taking in $100s of millions into the Clinton Foundation. This is not hearsay, it's 100% fact, unlike the Russian impeachment hoax and the rest of the made up bullchit with Trump.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Buttery males! A classic.***


Dec 18, 2021, 10:30 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: That would certainly be aggressive


Dec 18, 2021, 11:34 PM [ in reply to Re: That would certainly be aggressive ]

You have my pity.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 7
| visibility 560
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...129 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic