Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Tristan Leigh - what's the deal?
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 14
| visibility 1

Tristan Leigh - what's the deal?


Apr 29, 2022, 9:04 AM

Just skimmed the TNet article and I don't think he was discussed at all. He seemed to have so much potential and should contribute depth... what's the deal?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Tristan Leigh - what's the deal?


Apr 29, 2022, 10:07 AM

Good question. It's like when Linthicum went dark last season after the red shirt.

It's strange to me that NFL teams can take a seasoned O-lineman out of college (usually not even an elite program), and plug them directly into a starting role if needed. But we get all this great talent out of high school, and it takes years for them to develop/play/pan out. I'm not making a wise-crack, I'm just assuming this is probably a mass and discipline thing that evolves faster in college than high-school, but I just don't know. I do know Linthicum got screwed his senior year with COVID too.

Just want to see a big spark on O-Line this season.

[Clarifying screwed by covid because I believe they cancelled the season or at least shortened it]


Message was edited by: WarDaddy17®


2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Tristan Leigh - what's the deal?


Apr 29, 2022, 4:03 PM

It seems like the athleticism at DL is just disproportionate to OL. Takes a couple of years for the OL to develop and hold their own against these explosive DLs. But I agree, similar to Lithicum/Leigh, it just seems like some of these young OL hit a wall early in their careers.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL?


Apr 29, 2022, 4:39 PM

If big, muscular, and fast defensive linemen are able to run around and/or overpower large, slower offensive linemen, then why do teams continue insisting on that type of linemen?

Doesn’t this make an argument for slightly lighter linemen who are faster and more mobile?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL?


Apr 29, 2022, 5:32 PM

I’m not sure. Maybe tackles need to be able to overpower DEs and can sacrifice speed since they already know where they need to protect spatially. Maybe athletes chose to play the other side of the line, ie DL, for NFL odds/payday over OL that leads to an unbalanced talent gap. Haven’t really given it thought but good questions.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL?


Apr 29, 2022, 8:14 PM [ in reply to That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL? ]

Wait. This is brilliant. We have an insane pedigree at DL/DE, as well as talent and recruiting out the wazoo.

Let's just double those scholarships, and then we can have twice as many guys play both ways like in the old days. An offensive line that attacks like the Power Rangers would be a nightmare...

Let's do this!!

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL?


Apr 29, 2022, 11:21 PM [ in reply to That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL? ]

take those explosive players... make them have to remember plays. Then make them remember a snap count. Then make them have to remember the snap count when the play is changed at the line. Then remember who they are supposed to block. Then change that to something else when the defense move a second before the snap.

And then on top of that have them not know if that play is going to be a run or a pass (RPO).

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I get all that.


Apr 29, 2022, 11:36 PM

But your post illustrates to me that our offense has possibly gotten too complex. All the pre-snap reads, RPO decisions, etc. require many different people remembering a bunch things, then executing the right things, all at the same time. Seems like a recipe for disaster without a team full of smart, experienced, and very talented players.

Perhaps this is why Streeter talked a lot about getting rid of the plays that don’t work, and focusing on mastering the ones that do.

I am certainly not arguing for a bland, predictable offense. But your post made me wonder if what we’ve been doing isn’t optimal.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: I get all that.


Apr 30, 2022, 1:05 PM

What I described is just normal life for OL. You have to be able to handle it mentally as well as the physical component.

Complex is not exactly the word that comes to my mind when thinking about our offense. But that's just me.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Bingo


Apr 30, 2022, 2:28 AM [ in reply to Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL? ]

Bingo! All DL has to do is react to the snap(bit of a simplification but ftmp true)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Bingo


Apr 30, 2022, 1:06 PM

And if the DL is a rock, the LB is there to move him or tell him what to do.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL?


Apr 30, 2022, 1:44 PM [ in reply to Re: That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL? ]

I agree, there are definitely more mechanics and nuance involved on the offensive line as you pointed out well.

Our defense, and our DL, is accustomed to a lot of stunts, misdirection's, and LOS adjustments so I want to be careful not to minimalize their mind discipline as well...

Given our program's strength, I honestly believe we can be doing a better job of recruiting and then coaching more elite O-linemen, whether that be from an athletic, mental, character, experience standpoint, etc. I totally appreciate that our coaches develop our players, I think that is a hallmark of Clemson Football. But every once in awhile wouldn't it be nice to just get a pure monster on the O-line, like Bresee did for the D?

I'm definitely preaching to the choir now, but I definitely think Coach Austin has a lot of program-levers he can pull, and should be encouraged to do so. Exciting stuff for the boys in the trenches!

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You like that explosiveness from a guard. It’s good for the


Apr 30, 2022, 1:57 PM [ in reply to That begs the question: why not put equally explosive players on the OL? ]

Running game.

The tackle is a different animal all together. They have to have lateral agility and feet that you normally don’t see in a giant human being.

Development wise. We probably aren’t the best. Scheme wise, it is simply not OL friendly. We are finally getting under center and you can see the immediate improvement of called runs between the tackles. Running out of the RPO is difficult. It puts our OL at a disadvantage. DJ can’t make the read anyway. Just call run plays imo. If you get down in a 3 point stance and fire off the ball it doesn’t matter if the defense knows it’s coming. You can always get a yard or two. short yardage issues have plagued us, you can’t win short yardage from a 2 pt stance. Arrogant of Tony to say “we don’t do that”. That would be fine if we could actually run the ball Tony.

Did I mention I don’t care for Tony? I’m exited to see what Streeter can do. I like his changes already.. because they were the OBVIOUS moves.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You like that explosiveness from a guard. It’s good for the


Apr 30, 2022, 8:56 PM

TigerDominance®

Fricking spot on. Tony was a wet blanket and happy with 'status quo'.

While I am on my pedestrian soap-box (I cant afford soap due to my trailer being lein'd upon), here is something else to think about:

Ikem Ekwonu-Nc State
Evan Neal-Bama
Charles Cross-Mississippi State
Kenyon Green-ATM
Zion Johnson-Boston College
Trevor Penning-Northern Iowa
Tyler Smith-Tulsa
Cole Strange-Chatanooga
Luke Goedeke-Central Michigan
Ed Ingram-Corndogs
Joshua Ezedue-UNCheats
Nicholas Petit-Frere-Ohio turds
Abraham Lucas-Washington State
Dylan Parham-Memphis
Sean Rhyan-UCLA
Logan Bruss-Wisconsin
Daniele Faalede-Minnesota (Row, row, row your boat)
Max Mitchell-Louisiana
Spencer Burfrod-UTSA
Cordell Volson-North Dakata State
Zach Tom-Wake Forest

Stopping at round 4 because I'm simply pooped from typing. We have to do better in this area to remain elite.

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We refuse to hire an oline coach worth a ####


Apr 30, 2022, 11:25 PM

Oline has been a problem for years.....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 14
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic