Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 43
| visibility 1

Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:02 PM

No there's nothing going on at Clemson. Our HC assists players in transferring to other schools when it's obvious they're getting passed on the depth chart. Unlike your HC that yanks their scholly even if it leaves them no time to find a new school, much less give them assistance.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson doesn't care about basketball....as evidenced by Brown-L getting 14 years.


^^^^THIS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!^^^^


Jan 24, 2013, 12:03 PM

:)

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Make it idjit proof and someone will make a better idjit.


Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:07 PM

Whatever you guys need to tell yourself.

Which South Carolina players have had their "scholly yanked"

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:09 PM

These guys transferred. What's the big deal?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:14 PM

I agree, nothing wrong with it.

I just think its funny that when a "coot player" transfers, it is Spurrier pushing him out. But when its a Clemson player it is a players decision

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:59 PM

Don't worry. A lot of us think you're funny, too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It doesn't make sense to me either that people on here don't


Jan 24, 2013, 1:30 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

Say things that will sit well with you, neilly, and mr shep. I will applaud the persistent effort that is given. If I ever waste my time on your board I would hope to be disagreed with as well. Anything less would not make sense.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It doesn't make sense to me either that people on here don't


Jan 25, 2013, 9:32 PM

Well said sir

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Transferring players don't keep that graduatuion rate


Jan 24, 2013, 2:04 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

at 50%, pulling/not renewing scholarships does. Face it, your coach admitted last year when asked about pulling/not renewing scholarships , when he said some of these guys have to realize that they're not div 1 material. His word not TNet's.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

OVERSIGN


Jan 25, 2013, 9:12 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

Who else does that besides the SEC?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"We establish no religion in this country, we mandate no belief. Nor will we ever. Church and state are, and must remain, separate." ~Ronald Reagan


Tell Clowney to count them


Jan 24, 2013, 12:10 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

Oh Wait, he can take his shoes off it it helps him count that high!!!



LOLOLOLOLOL

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Make it idjit proof and someone will make a better idjit.


Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:16 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

http://www.al.com/sports/index.ssf/2011/10/college_athletes_rights_some_a.html

i'm not one to say this is right or wrong, but clemson and scar do it differently.

the south carolina high school coaches were up in arms over this change at scar.

they have either gotten over it or don't think this could ever happen 'to one of their kids.'

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:36 PM

The Griggs guy has selective memory. I won't take time to post links but several have gotten the calls, and it was well publicized that scholly offers were pulled at the last moment for a couple of their commits, not giving the kids time to reopen recruiting. spurrier is a sleaze, but he fits in well at a place where beating Clemson is their biggest dream, and about their only accomplishment of late (or ever, really).

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You truly are a credit to your school...Whatever we need to


Jan 24, 2013, 1:55 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

tell ourselves indeed...As you lurk...

2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 25, 2013, 9:35 PM [ in reply to Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

Freddie Brown says Hi!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

POTD^^^^^^^^^^***


Jan 24, 2013, 12:07 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LB buried on the depth chart leaving > Asst coaches


Jan 24, 2013, 12:11 PM

bolting.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It is a good thing


Jan 24, 2013, 12:12 PM

You posted this bf a Carolina fan did, I mean just bc players and coaches jump ship at sc doesn't mean they would jump ship at Clemson.

Some keep talking about young talent and new recruits coming in but let me ask this....isn't it weird that this amazing linebacker class signed 2 years ago has been a bust? Seems like a developmental issue when a 2 star starts over 2 5 stars and a solid 4 . Or maybe it is bad evaluations. Who knows.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It is a good thing


Jan 24, 2013, 12:15 PM

So they were hot shots in high school? Big deal, even the scrubs here were good in HS. Some just never make the transition..........

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Soccer 2013 IS A COOT!


Jan 24, 2013, 12:16 PM [ in reply to It is a good thing ]

avoid him/her like the plague

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I don't trust anyone who likes soccer.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:25 PM

Socialists.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tell 'em coot***


Jan 24, 2013, 12:26 PM [ in reply to It is a good thing ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It is a good thing


Jan 25, 2013, 9:09 PM [ in reply to It is a good thing ]

It really called how ell they recover from injury. Whats Latty done lately!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:12 PM

Read this COOT, this will tell you all you need to know!!!

http://milehighsports.com/2013/01/03/sec-football-teams-have-a-built-in-edge/

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thanks for the heads up. Was wondering.***


Jan 24, 2013, 12:14 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Thanks for the heads up. Was wondering.***


Jan 24, 2013, 12:50 PM

Dabo just trimming the fat. The difference in him and the Ole Balz Sac is Dabo does it to the player early enough for them to find another school. The Ole Balz Sac waits until there is no chance that the player will be able to get on the roster of his competition.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:49 PM

That being said,Clemson is losing depth on an already suspect defense. That combined with the fact that Boyd has no signature road wins in front of a raucous crowd(all due respect to the 45k at Lane stadium) should help South Carolina realize their "dream" again.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

BAHAHAHA


Jan 24, 2013, 12:53 PM

we are losing depth LOL!!!

We are actually deep at LB!

That suspect D played pretty well against that SEC Powerhouse LSWHoo!!

Fact is the D got better throughout the year and was clicking at the end without Teek getting minutes. This will not hurt us at all!!

Go Peck dirt COOT!!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Make it idjit proof and someone will make a better idjit.


Re: BAHAHAHA


Jan 24, 2013, 12:55 PM

And Tony Steward will have his first full strength spring at Clemson plus D.J. Greenlee, who I saw in person, will hopefully not dissapoint.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Kellen. Jones. Y'all need to start remembering the name.***


Jan 24, 2013, 12:55 PM



2024 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I remember watching video of the Oklahoma Drills and he was


Jan 24, 2013, 1:00 PM

blowing people up. I hope too that he'll be an immediate impact on the field, but otherwise, what makes you so sure? Have you ever seen him play?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Fair enough, not in a game.


Jan 24, 2013, 1:20 PM

Let's call it a hunch. I've heard multiple people at multiple schools whose opinions I trust say that he is a beast.

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've heard and read that too. Hopefully he's legit.***


Jan 24, 2013, 1:22 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Perfect post. Your dream is to beat Clemson.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:54 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

Our dream is to win a national championship.

This is a large part of why things will always revert to the natural order in this state.

2024 student level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2008_ncaa_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-clemsonpoker489.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Coots who are stupid make me laugh.


Jan 24, 2013, 12:58 PM

Hey bud you won 4 years in a row, we've won 7 in a row before. Look who is ahead by 24 games in the series and has a Nat. Champ. USC is our little sister who has fought back a little in recent years, but will eventually crawl back in the hole you call Columbia.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh look everyone, another #### Mensa member.***


Jan 24, 2013, 1:01 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The 2012 Peach Bowl was played in Death Valley...Who knew?***


Jan 24, 2013, 1:58 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]



2024 white level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Not sure why we should be concerned about what coots are


Jan 24, 2013, 2:10 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

concerned about.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 25, 2013, 9:22 PM [ in reply to Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers. ]

And what dream is that? The one that GR sniffed up his nose!!!

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Re: Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 24, 2013, 1:08 PM

Raucous ?!!! Don't you mean redneck white trash ?!!! Go play in traffic COOT!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

92


Jan 24, 2013, 1:34 PM

That is one mans opinion....much like yours and mind doesn't make it a fact. Signning kids to a 4 year schlarship is not like offering tenure. The high school level is no proving ground for college performanc and these kids are not here because of their academic performance. If they are here because of their academic performance then it is fair to evaluate a kid based on that performance too. The flip dide of the argument....should these kids be forced to stay 4 years.....no. That would be unenforcable. Kids transfer all the time and for different reasons. The high profile kids are pointed out. Regular students do not get4 year scholarships and before you start....a regular student is not furnished with the benefits a athlete is so there has to be a higher standard. We just need to figure out what those standards are.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 92


Jan 24, 2013, 2:03 PM

Do you not get a sickening feeling everytime you see one of these 18 year olds get the rug pulled out from under them by these selfish SEC schools. I will take Dabo all day long keeping his promise to kids versus these fair weather coaches looking for the next best thing! Just ask Jake Nichaelopoulous (butchered spelling sorry Jake)!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 25, 2013, 8:41 PM

Bravo, make it hurt feelings!!! +

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Attn: Coot lurkers concerned over our transfers.


Jan 25, 2013, 9:44 PM

very well said.. also very true!

badge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Replies: 43
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic