Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
3rd and 5 or more
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 28
| visibility 1

3rd and 5 or more


Jul 26, 2013, 7:31 AM

If the Tigers on D can make Murray face this down and distance a lot during the game we will put the brakes on their O a lot during the game. The key to the game in my opinion is keeping them out of play action passing yardage like 3rd and 2 or 3.

3rd and 5 makes us able to pin our ears back and rattle Murray with a pass rush. Then we'll see him toss it up for grabs.

This is the key to our upcoming victory. Tigers by 17!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

M. Alexander will feast.***


Jul 26, 2013, 8:45 AM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Anybody that says Coach Brownell is the best coach to come through Clemson is going to start an argument." -JP Hall


Re: M. Alexander will feast.***


Jul 26, 2013, 8:50 AM

Add Travis Blanks to the list!!

#11 is BEAST mode!!

Go Tigers!!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 3rd and 5 or more


Jul 26, 2013, 9:04 AM

I hope the DE's and DT's feast on Murray's tail with an occasional LB sack on a blitzer. We gonna get him shook early and watch him crumble

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 3rd and 5 or more


Jul 26, 2013, 9:07 AM

The key:

Stopping Gurley!

Stop the run, and they are done!!

Vic Beasley, Grady Jarrett & the boys need to be STOUT and show out for us to win.

Go Tigers!!!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 3rd and 5 or more


Jul 26, 2013, 9:12 AM

I see what you're getting at, but 3rd and 8 would be more appropriate since we averaged 7.1 yds per play last year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Per attempt, per completion, or all plays?***


Jul 26, 2013, 9:19 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


All plays. Good for #1 in the nation ***


Jul 26, 2013, 9:31 AM

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Per attempt, per completion, or all plays?***


Jul 26, 2013, 9:32 AM [ in reply to Per attempt, per completion, or all plays?*** ]

Per attempt I assume since the stat just says 7.1 per play on average.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Per Att is a measure of Passing stats


Jul 26, 2013, 9:34 AM

UGA averaged 10.0 per attempt last year which was also number one in the nation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Great stats. Now, let's take into consideration # of plays.


Jul 26, 2013, 10:00 AM

GA's 6.9 yds,/play x 68 plays/game -> ~470 yds./game

Clemson's 6 yds./play x 85 plays/game -> ~510 yds./game

Red zone scoring: Clemson #1

4th down conversions: Clemson #1

# of plays/ game: Clemson #3

Combine # of plays, ability to covert on 4th down, and red zone scoring....

Everything about the Os is relative to the Ds they face. There's no denying that both Os are outstanding. This game will be decided by which D can slow the other's O the best. I have it Clemson by 10+. We'll see.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Bump.***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:17 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Number of plays is a volatile stat


Jul 26, 2013, 10:24 AM [ in reply to Great stats. Now, let's take into consideration # of plays. ]

Clemson had a high of 102 and a low of 59. With such volatility, I'm not sure picking the average is as valid as Clemson fans would like it to be. In fact, anywhere from 69 plays up to 94 plays is within one standard deviation of the average. How can we accurately predict where Clemson will land on that scale?

I'd suspect that UGA's coaching staff is keenly aware of the gameplans teams like USCjr and VT employed to keep a lid on the total number of plays run, but I also think that "The Chad" knows he needs to run a ton of plays to have success.

It will be fun to watch it play out.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

LSU...105. As to 4th down and red zone, that's about


Jul 26, 2013, 10:29 AM

sustaining drives and finishing. #1 and #1.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


LSU was 100 according to CFBStats.com


Jul 26, 2013, 10:37 AM

http://www.cfbstats.com/2012/team/147/total/offense/gamelog.html

As to the 4th down %, so what? If UGA is forcing enough fourth downs to make this stat relevant, I won't be unhappy, and I'll take our chances.

As to the Red Zone Conversions, UGA actually converted red zone TDs at a higher rate. Clemson was able to do better when FGs were taken into account. That being said, this game will be won on TDs not FGs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You're intermingling stats of 14 vs. 13 games. If you're


Jul 26, 2013, 10:47 AM

going to sight % TDs, how can the # of trips not be taken into account?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Ummmmmm ......


Jul 26, 2013, 10:52 AM

Percentages do take the number of trips into account.

You should know things like this before making silly responses.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh, and "sight" doesn't mean the same thing as "cite" ***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:53 AM [ in reply to You're intermingling stats of 14 vs. 13 games. If you're ]

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good catch. +1.***


Jul 26, 2013, 11:06 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Look at it this way ....


Jul 26, 2013, 10:28 AM [ in reply to Great stats. Now, let's take into consideration # of plays. ]

The average yards per play takes into account ~950 data points. Average plays per game has 13 or 14 data points depending upon the season. The law of large numbers indicates that the former average is bound to be much more precise than the latter.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I got your data points. Look at it this way. Clemson by 10+.***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:32 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Thanks for confirming the validity of my post***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:40 AM

nm

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What "validity"?***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:48 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Usually when posters have no valid response


Jul 26, 2013, 10:51 AM

They resort to things like "here's your data points".

If you have a valid counterpoint to the law of large numbers, please share it with the group.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

clemson by 17?


Jul 26, 2013, 9:23 AM

Are you serious? UGA has a great balanced offense. I expect teams to trade scores, neither team will lead by that much.

Plus many are banking on a true freshman corner in week 1 vs a solid opponent. Murray will throw at him all day.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

17 may be a bit much but Clemson by 10+.***


Jul 26, 2013, 9:30 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: 17 may be a bit much but Clemson by 10+.***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:41 AM

SOLOS - I love it, I really do. You and OJ are the most consistent / persistent people I have ever seen in my life. All I can say is I "hope" you are wrong. If you aren't I will be the first to say so ... You waive your 10+ flag every day and I chuckle ... Not at the predication but the consistency.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thanx. I stand by it. I'll be here 9/1 to discuss, either way***


Jul 26, 2013, 10:50 AM

null


Message was edited by: SOLOS®


2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: clemson by 17?


Jul 26, 2013, 10:57 AM [ in reply to clemson by 17? ]

My point is valid if the Tigers keep UGA behind the chains on 3rd most of the night. It will be a long night for the mutts. If we only get stops on 20% of those 3rd and 5's or more, the Tigers will blow up the Dawgs. I say "if" that happens, it will be CU by 17.

I think the Dawgs averaging 7.1 ypp on the Tigers is an absurd number to believe will happen. Talk about wishful thinking....

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 28
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic