Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
On negotiating with God.
General Boards - Religion & Philosophy
add New Topic
Replies: 22
| visibility 1

On negotiating with God.


May 15, 2022, 10:53 AM
Reply

"Off topic (yet not entirely off topic), the examples of negotiations between towering figures of the OT with God are fascinating. Neither me nor anyone I've ever known would ... if God spoke directly to us ... dare to negotiate with Him.

That is, unless God also spoke to us and instructed us to 'make our case' to Him.

(?) Since...how do you view the 'nerve' of Abraham and David and other when they negotiated with God?

I am no expert on the Bible. I am a student. It is sometimes easy for me to remember applicable passages because some of God's Word is written on my heart. He has a way of doing that which I can only explain by calling it divine. Which ever passage I quote or C&P here I urge the readers to look them up for accuracy and especially for context. Trust no man with your understanding. God is too close to ignore.

I've heard that a successful negotiation is one in which no one gets everything they want. I learned from negotiations that knowing what the guy on the other side of the table wants is the quickest way to get what you want. All my negotiations were over money.

We negotiate when we pray. We beg God to make our children well. Some, like me, are stupid, ignorant, or believe we are in such need that we are willing to promise God something in return. We, the stupid, ignorant and needy quickly learn that we are unable to keep a promises and cease promises. That indicates that we have a position from which to bargain with God. We do not.

I know first hand from year after year of experience that God's will is satisfying. David wrote, Psa 37:4 "Delight thyself also in the LORD; and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart."

Chicken or egg. When I sought the Lord with all my heart it all became clear. God became the desire of my heart. This is not exclusively offered to me but to you and anyone else who will put the entire measure of their faith in Him. For what is the desire of our hearts if it is not what will make us happy, fill us with joy and complete satisfaction?

'It is God who works in us both to will and to do His good pleasure.' Then, by what 'will,' do we will to do for God and by 'what power,' do we do His will? By God's will He gives us His will through grace by our faith. Faith has only one tiny value if put in anything other than God. Faith in anything other than God brings a false sense of security. Faith in God brings the understanding and total comprehension of a real security, an eternal security and a security that is identified in Romans 8:28 in no uncertain terms. It covers everything.

The Jewish people of the OT lived under a different contract. They did not have The Holy Spirit working within both to will and to do God's good pleasure. It was the Law, they break the deal and God ends their freedom, their prosperity and sometimes their lives.

They lived bound to the Law, a law which Christ fulfilled, a contract which He executed on behalf of you, me and anyone else who accepts Him as Savior. They broke their contract so God fulfilled their obligation with the death of Christ. They refused Him and God offered it to us.

Any contract can be negotiated, it the gift that can not be negotiated. One either accepts a gift of not. One doesn't bargain a gift. I suppose it was OK for them to negotiate with God since they had a different relationship. I've heard it compared to a marriage God to Israel as is man to wife.

"Here is a million dollars, I want to give it to you." Who ever said 'No, I want you to give me two million, except a son to his father?'

God didn't promise us with conditions other than that we believe He was serious about that gift and we accept the gift as promised.

We negotiate when we pray. We ask for what we want, at least what we think we need and what we really need. Then we negate or cancel some or sometimes most of our prayer by asking God that His will be done. NTTAWWT It's like 'I asked for all this stuff but I'd rather have what you want me to have.' In doing so we confess that we are ignorant of God's will. I believe He loves and honors that because He loves the humble.

Christ Jesus did that as recorded in Matt Chpt 26:39. There is nothing wrong with that. However, when we ask in Jesus name we are asking for God's will to be the ultimate authority in deciding which of our prayers God honors. Imo and especially to me, it's a fail-safe to keep me out of trouble.

So yes, I have tried to negotiate with God and failed to keep my promise. God kept up His end of the deal because it was His will not because of my promise. Anyone who wants to make promises to God is welcome to do so. I remember a huge fail and still after 45 years remember the steep learning curve and the misery which followed.

My granny use to say 'A burnt hen stays away from the fire.' I suspect many of those who wouldn't dare try to negotiate with God are just staying away from the fire.

I'm sorry for rambling and not getting directly to the point. That's the way my old mind works and I appreciate those who tolerate my mannerism and long winded responses.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 15, 2022, 10:54 AM
Reply

RememberTheDanny

Sorry for not tagging you in the OP.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 15, 2022, 12:23 PM
Reply

It is really good of you to take the time to explain the 'negotiations with God' context to me. (Not suggesting that you, via sharing your insightful and detailed explanations, are presenting yourself as an authority. I realize that any suggestion of such would embarrass you.)

Back to the topic: It never occurred to me that my prayers are actually a 'negotiation' with God. No kidding, that never even occurred to me! And yet it was an unanswered question to me about why God wasn't at least a bit irritated at the great men of the OT when they negotiated with Him.

Ha ha ... here was the 'great me' noticing the flaws in others when I am so much worse! Figures.

But you spelled it out (in your kind way). No fooling here, I really appreciate it.

Sure, I'd for a long time had enough wherewithal to not be embarrassed during prayer when thanking God for His blessings, and to then futilely rattle off some specific blessings which happened to be on my mind during the time of my prayer. And I possess enough humility to follow up with my 'thanks for this and thanks for that' stuff by pointing out during prayer that I recognize the utter futility of attempting to 'list' all of God's blessings. And I know that He doesn't 'blame me' for this shortcoming. And I have enough sense ... after 'negotiating' for favors, to conclude with the "Your will be done" and then "in Christ's name I pray" ... to leave it all up to God. (As if He needed my permission to 'take care of everything for everyone's needs. Yeah, right.)

But I had completely whiffed with the 'prayer is actually a negotiations' thing.

Thanks for your time and effort to share this context ClemsonTiger1988®!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


I've never found anyone who believes exactly as me.


May 15, 2022, 2:40 PM
Reply

Take care, many may consider me a heretic.

Check your tmale.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 15, 2022, 4:59 PM
Reply

That's a good topic...negotiating (or not) with a god (or God). Lots of possible angles on this one:

It raises so many questions, all of which are religion and culturally specific. Just gonna toss some first thoughts out since I'm short on time right now...

1) What type of relationship you can have with a god? Father-child? Friend? Master-slave?
2) Does/Would a god change their mind? Or is the "negotiation" merely a ruse or a test?
3) Those 2 questions then lead to the nature of communication with a god all-together, and what is it for?

That is, unless you are praising them what is the point of any communication at all? (I suspect that would be the Muslim "submission" position). If you ask, or pray, for anything from a god, where is your faith that they already have all the answers? God has a plan, seeing through a glass darkly, etc. It seems that complete faith would never ask anything from a god, simply accept what is given, independent of whether it seems good or bad.

It seems that if a god cannot be swayed, or negotiated with, and all the relationship expectations bewteen a god and man are laid out up front, like obedience for Jews, believing for Christians, and submission for Muslims, then what point is communication at all. Abide by the contract, or don't. Nothing else to talk about.

This a great one. I'll have to think on it some more and see how others see it (Hindus, Buddists, etc)

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 16, 2022, 9:29 AM
Reply

One may serve a god as he pleases. A false god is never offended.

The real God, Father of Jesus my Christ has been working on our relationship for 50 years now. The Bible accurately describes how our first encounter with God should be. We must come as a little child seeking salvation.

When a child hungers he does not ask 'Do you have a sandwich to give me?' He knows his father has provided all he needs and simply ask for it. So faith in Him is primary. "Without faith is it impossible to please God.

God is my best friend now. He is that because other relationship were established and maintained first.

1. He is the Almighty God. There is no doubt in me that He created the Heavens and Earth.

"The Heavens declare the glory of God and the firmament showeth his handlywork. Day unto day uttereth speech and night unto night showeth knowledge. There is no speech or language where their words are not heard. Their line is gone out to the end of the earth and their words to the end of the world." Psa 19:1-3 or 4.

2. He is my Lord and master. "Behold, as the eyes of servants look unto the hand of their masters, and as the eyes of a maiden unto the hand of her mistress; so our eyes wait upon the LORD our God, until that he have mercy upon us. Psa 123:2

3. He is my Father in Heaven. "Be ye therefore followers of God, as dear children; And walk in love, as Christ also hath loved us, and hath given himself for us an offering and a sacrifice to God for a sweetsmelling savour. But fornication, and all uncleanness, or covetousness, let it not be once named among you, as becometh saints; Neither filthiness, nor foolish talking, nor jesting, which are not convenient: but rather giving of thanks." Eph 5:1-4

4. After accepting God in each of those roles you (whosoever) realize the joy in your (whosesoever) heart could only be done by a best friend.

Previous to this present relationship with God through Jesus, I served myself. I had a seriously perverted way of living. I confused pleasure with joy, exhaustion with satisfaction and lust with love. Yet even now I remain a sinner saved by God grace.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 16, 2022, 11:03 AM
Reply

>One may serve a god as he pleases. A false god is never offended. The real God, Father of Jesus my Christ has been working on our relationship for 50 years now...


I don't think anyone deliberately follows a false god, though. Why would they bother worshiping if they don't truly believe? Just be an atheist, it's a lot easier. But different people may be spoken to differently.

As a child I had to follow one set of rules...in bed by 9, cut the grass, etc.
My younger brother had a different set of rules...in bed by 8, wash the dishes, etc.
Same parents, different rules for their children.

Similarly, Jews must obey, Christians must believe, Muslims must submit, Buddhists must enlighten, and Taoists must flow. No false gods there, just different rules for different children. Why different rules? Who knows. God can do anything he wishes.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 17, 2022, 10:47 AM
Reply

Is it any wonder that your post reminded me of a passage in the Bible? Paul came across such activites in Athens as recorded in Act Chpt 17 starting in vs 16. I could post it but I'd rather everyone here reading these conversations refer to the KJV and decided for him/herself what that scripture means.

I'm evidently the 'babbler,' in the passage and the readers here...well, here's a teaser.

21 (For all the Athenians and strangers which were there spent their time in nothing else, but either to tell, or to hear some new thing.)

I do so enjoy your writings that I consider myself as one of the hearers and tellers. I wish that we had more babblers here I do love to hear as well as babble. They seem to have dwindled recently.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 17, 2022, 3:44 PM
Reply

That's a good verse and I laughed at babblers. You might remember a song by the B-52s called Deadbeat Club, about folks who sit around, drink coffee and do nothing but babble all day, in Athens, Ga, funny enough. Seems folks never do change, from ancient Athens to today.

Paul was extremely well educated, and I'm sure his conversations with the Stoics and Epicureans were awesome. Man, to be a fly on the wall in that room...

I read somewhere that one of the big hurdles for the Greek converts was the rising from the dead stuff. Not even any divine aspects of it, but simply the physical aspect.

Of course, from the other side, the big issue was how to handle the Greek converts, as in, what was required of them? I think I wrote some stuff about it and the Antioch debate somewhere a while back.

Those early years, before everything was settled and packaged were great, and I hope to spend a lot of time on them when we get there.

And yes, we need more babblers!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Our number one problem with understanding...


May 19, 2022, 5:10 PM
Reply

God is our intense feelings that we are the best frame of reference. Everything in our lives has a beginning and an end even if it began before we were born and ends long after we end.

When talking about rising from the dead the Greeks were thinking Zombie.

I'd like to read your 'Antioch Debate.' I'll try searching for it after I get the 2K primer on all this bare metal on my project car. I'm gonna take Sat and Sun off so I'll do it over the weekend when I'm not playing GT7.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Our number one problem with understanding...


May 21, 2022, 4:02 PM
Reply

I'm not sure where I put it, in a main post or in a reply somewhere, but the debate is referenced in Galatians 2:11-14. The question is whether non-Jewish converts to Christianity must follow Jewish law, or could become Christian without following Jewish law. Peter said yes, Paul said no, and James ruled with Paul ultimately, making it easy for everyone.

Really opened the door to a lot of folks who might not have been too excited about circumcision lol. Big moment in the early church and early church expansion. I think I referred to it in my Barnabus post now, maybe. Barnabus was travelling with Paul, but disagreed with him on the easy entry requirements I think.

Never played Turismo, but am a big fan of GTA series. Nothing like riding around, listening to music, committing crimes and running from the police hahah.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm going to take a hard pass on the Law.


May 22, 2022, 9:42 AM
Reply

There are still folks, good folks, who mix the law with grace. We please our bosses by obeying the rules and sometimes even families; every now and then I pleased my wife but that's another tale.

However...

God didn't forgive the sin Adam and Eve, Abraham, or the Children of Israel because of their good works or because of the sacrifice of animals. He didn't forgive the sin of prophets because of they served God as a go between Him and His chosen people. He forgave them for the exact same reason He forgives me.

He didn't forgive the Jews of their transgression because they begged for forgiveness or because they brought gifts/offerings to the temple or because the good they did far outweighed the bad. He forgave both them and us for the same reason today. We believe in Him who was sent to be our sacrifice, The Lord Jesus Christ.

You asked why can't God be different things to different people. Though He is my God, my Lord and Savior, my Heavenly Father and my best Friend none of that would be so without me first being acceptable to Him as one who believed Him when He said 'This is my beloved Son in Whom I am well pleased.' Calling Him a liar is no way to befriend Him.

Without Christ, then, how can a man be acceptable to God? It's not by being sinless for all have sinned, it's not by sacrifice of animals, it's not by preaching, it's not by obeying the law or witnessing and testifying to God's truth but it is by believing that Jesus is the Christ.

You understand what a cornerstone was to the ancient architects. Maybe more so than anyone here. They carefully selected a stone with perfect angles. The masons used that stone as a guide for the construction and also in the selection of other stones.

If the building was to be square the first stone set on the corner was to be perfect in dimension including length, height, angles and size. The stones which followed aligned with the cornerstone. Even if the stones which followed the cornerstone were not perfect and perfectly aligned they followed closely to the lines extending from the cornerstone. In both horizontal directions and the vertical direction the corner set the standard. The quality of the building was totally dependent upon the quality of the cornerstone.

Jesus is God's cornerstone. We are not perfect and we are not perfectly aligned but we must be selected to be of God's building and we must be placed on the line extending from God's Cornerstone.

Billions of dollars are spent every year by those trying to do enough good to outweigh their bad. It requires scientific notation to guestimate the number of calories burnt by men trying to work their way into God's grace. Money can not buy God's grace; work can not earn His love. His grace is extended to us, His love is ours to acknowledge and enjoy and His salvation is offered to whosoever believes.

It takes no money and requires no calorie to be burned to believe and be saved by the Blood of Christ.

The Law is good. It's as good as the teachers who reached you and made you appreciate education so they could teach you. It's a good as the hard professors in college who demanded much of you. The Law was, according to Paul, the schoolmaster.

Galatians 3:

24 Wherefore the law was our schoolmaster to bring us unto Christ, that we might be justified by faith.

25 But after that faith is come, we are no longer under a schoolmaster.

26 For ye are all the children of God by faith in Christ Jesus.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I'm going to take a hard pass on the Law.


May 22, 2022, 6:17 PM
Reply

That's a great reply 88 and I understand where you are coming from, having been a Christian many years in my own life. As I've said before I always work with the assumption that everyone is completely correct in their own understanding and practice of their beliefs. No one practices what they don't truly believe in their own heart and per their relationship with their god. Why would they bother to try and fool themselves or him?

I see things as one might see eternity, from our earlier discussion. That is, God being outside of the universe. Not only could God be (if he exists) external to the universe, time, and all physical things, he could also be external to man's attempts to understand him through religions. That is, confining him to the words of the just one text, like the Bible, or any other sacred scripture of any religion, would be putting our constraint on an unconstrainable, all-powerful being. And I'm not sure we can constrain God by saying "these are his only words." Even if the seeming contradictions between religions don't make sense to us, why should they, any more than how time or light or eternity work?

The Jews were restricted to sacrifice as a means of absolving sin, per God's directives to them in the Law. Then Jesus said "I have fulfilled that law." Among balking at Jesus himself (for his lineage and non-military background), they also balked at the idea of God changing their convenant, although again as an all-powerful being he could do that whenever he wished I presume. And that would be the Christian stance on why Christianity is a "modernized" Judaism. Same God, new rules.

But the Muslims then use that same argument in the same way. They view the Trinity as blasphemy. Just like the ancient Hebrews were chastised for worshiping multiple gods and images of God, Muslims see Christians as worshipping the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost as the same thing. Even if one says they are merely different facets of the same God, that is still a form of idolatry to them. Just as using a statue to represent God is wrong, using a facet to represent God is wrong. There is one, and only one, complete, indivisible, God to them.

They also say that the Christian idea of Jesus (God) dying on the cross is absolute blasphemy. God does not die, ever, in any form, or in any way. (though they don't believe he has other forms). Even the idea of a divine being dying is folly to them. Divine beings are immortal. And just like Christians see the New Testament as "new rules" superseding the Old Testament, Muslims say the Koran is "new rules" superseding the New Testament.

So without disagreeing with you at all, I also can't disagree with anyone else, either. I'm not privy to anyone's conversations with God or gods, so I don't know what he may have told anyone, or why. That's why, short of being omniscient myself, I have to assume everyone is correct, which leaves me at God be different things to different people. There's no way for me to know that God did't tell the Jews that Jesus was just an ordinary man, the Christians that Jesus was God himself, and the Muslims that Jesus was a holy prophet. And maybe even concealing himself completely to atheists. Maybe all at the same time, as seemingly inconsistent as that is.

Although it is a severe blow to my human hubris <img border="> , I just don't, and can't, know the mind of God. And so what appear to be inconsistencies may just the mark of limited understanding. Through a glass darkly, ya know?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

It's all way more simple.


May 26, 2022, 11:35 AM
Reply

Religions fall into two categories. One category is a list of all the religions where man goes about to reconcile himself to God by the effort and work he does.

The one which is not in that category is the one in which God reconciles man to Himself by incarnating a human body and giving Himself as the only sacrifice to redeem man and make man fit to experience God's Holy presence.

A child breaks a toy, tries many times in many ways to fix the toy then decides he can't do it. Daddy is right there watching all along waiting for the child to bring the toy to him.

That's too simple. Daddy made the toy and knows exactly how to fix it. He is waiting on each of us to bring His toy to His shop so He can restore it to its original form and condition.

He patiently waits for each of us.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: It's all way more simple.


May 26, 2022, 7:45 PM
Reply

I always look forward to your responses 88 because they open new avenues of thought and discussion. So all this stuff doesn’t get lost deep enough that others can’t find it, I’m gonna start a new thread to continue this discussion and open it up to others. good stuff!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"If you want something done right, do it yourself."


May 30, 2022, 10:03 AM
Reply

That is God's attitude toward saving mankind. He did it Himself because that was the only way it was going to happen. That was so from Adam and will be so throughout all generations of man.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 26, 2022, 8:10 PM
Reply

There is no God that you know of. Maybe one day there is a slim chance you might find out. Very slim chance. It's man made bull, but you never know. Everything you do believe is nonsense and wishful thinking and just hoping. You're living all you will ever know.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 26, 2022, 9:51 PM
Reply

Thanks for replying Anonymouse.

Would you mind expanding on your post? I don't want to put any words in your mouth or make any assumptions, but it sounds like you are coming from the agnostic/atheist end of the spectrum.

I'd like this to be an exchange of ideas, so if you'd like to share more of your thought process it would make this a better post.

Atheism has been around since the Greek philosophers from about 500 BCE, so you are in good company if you ascribe to that thought.

Are you saying there is no God in any sense, even say, magnetism or some unknown universal force, no caring God who might be involved in human lives, no creator God who made the universe, or some other variation. It makes a difference as far as the implications.

I was an atheist myself for over 20 years, so I have some familiarity with the basic concepts. I'd love to hear how you see things.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 26, 2022, 11:11 PM
Reply

Point is we don't know what happens. What is fact that all religion is man made bull. That is fact.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 27, 2022, 3:07 AM
Reply

>>>Point is we don't know what happens.


I agree whole-heartedly with you on that. I think everyone, regardless of their beliefs, has to admit 2 things if they are being honest with themselves.


1) There is mystery in the universe, and
2) We don't know everything.


I've never met anyone who claimed they understand everything in the universe, from how a seed grows from a single drop of inanimate water, to how a spider knows to spin a web, to what regulates the chemical releases in your body, and on and on. So I think we all have 1) and 2) in common.


Now, from that common ground things diverge a bit...like in a million different directions.


What do you do with that mystery? Do you ignore it? Do you try to attribute it to something? Is that something purely mechanical or is it sentient? Is it singular or multiple? A million different ways to try and grapple with the millions of mysteries that everyone acknowledges. A person can pick any aspect of existence and generate an endless stream of questions related to it. And every answer you ever come up with can always be followed by "why?"



So, the story of religion is the story of "how do you deal with mystery?" Or do you choose to pretend it doesn't exist.

Is the universe simply a mechanical device with no trace of intelligence beyond our own? Why?
Is there a friendly old man looking after us who cares about our individual lives? Why?
Is this old man just a creator who made the universe and walked away? Why?
Is this friendly old man simply a fifth universal force, like the strong and weak nuclear forces, gravity, and electromagnetism? Why? And on and on.



Now, an Atheist would just say "There is no God." But that still doesn't remove the mystery. They simply choose some other mechanism, or name, to explain why electrons and protons have 2, but not 3, or 4 or 5 different charge types. Why are there only 2, which we have chosen to label positive and negative?


An Agnostic would say "We simply don't have the tools to understand. 5 senses are not enough." And that may be true. X-Rays have been around since the beginning of the universe. But we couldn't see them until 1895, when we invented a device that detected them. So what else is out there that we still haven't detected? An agnostic may have resigned himself to never understanding the mysteries, but the mysteries are there nevertheless. And the why remains.


A Deist sees order in the universe, physical laws being followed, planets orbiting stars, not just randomly floating around in space, etc. They attribute that order to design, not randomness, and therefore, intelligence of some sort. Maybe not human intelligence, but something other than complete chaos and randomness. And that may explain some mysteries, but again, not others.


A Theist sees more involvement still. Not just an intelligence, but an intelligence that humans can interact with in some fashion. Maybe that intelligence cares about us, maybe not, maybe a little, maybe a lot. Maybe there's more than one, and a million more variations off that.


But the one thing the Atheist, Agnostic, Deist and Theist all have in common is that they are trying to understand what they can’t fully grasp. And for all of them, the mystery is still there.


How does a smell bring memories to you?
When you sleep, what part of you is generating the dream, what part is remembering the dream, and what is controlling your heartbeat and breathing while all this is going on? And where are "you" while these 4 things, and a billion others, are happening in your body?


Is all that random? Is all that by design? Is anyone pulling the strings? Are you simply a wound up clock slowly unwinding to your death? Does anything you do matter at the eternal scale? How do you know? Do you have free will? Do you have limited free will? Are all your actions predetermined? Are you a single life, or is each cell in your body a life?


What separates the split second when a living body becomes a still warm dead body? While their cells are still working, but after their consciousness is gone, are they alive or dead? Is life tied to consciousness? Are you some type of dead when you are asleep and your consciousness is gone? What is that spark of life that moved on, and where did it go? What is controlling all that? What created that system? And why that way rather than some other way? More questions, more mysteries.


It’s the attempt to grapple with all that, and more, that is at the root of religion. Now there are other more devious reasons, sure, and anything man is involved in he will corrupt and pervert and exploit. You can count on that. But although it can bring out some, of the worst in man, it can bring out some of the best. A lot of killing has been done over religion, but also the greatest buildings, works of art, and most inspired moments. Like anything else, it can be used for good or bad.


Religion isn’t for everyone. Some people just don’t care about it, don’t have questions, and don’t need it. And that’s fine. And for others simple answers are all they need. They are fine having “God did it” as the answer for everything, or “Natural science did it” as the answer for everything. And that’s fine too. But there’s much more to it than that.


So to go back to your original comment, “Point is we don't know what happens.” I agree completely. And, if you agree that no one knows everything, can anyone then say that there either is, or is not, a God, or anything else really, with complete certainty?


But given that, do you then do nothing, or do you do something? Are you curious, or not? Do you try to understand, or not? That’s a choice every individual makes for themselves.







>>>What is fact that all religion is man made bull. That is fact.


I’ll agree that it’s man-made. With the view that religion is man’s effort to understand the unknown, it kind of has to be man-made. If there were no man, I doubt there would be religion, but I’ll part with you on calling it bull.


Some of it is simplistic, sure, but a lot of it started with a simplistic audience. For a neanderthal, the easiest way to explain a lighting bolt in the sky is a bigger version of a neanderthal who can throw lightning bolts. Enter the god Thor. A simple question answered by a simple answer.


But religion is not just rudimentary science for natural phenomenon like lightning bolts. It has grown to grapple with deeper concepts, like what is the nature and meaning of life itself. If you only think of religion as Christian Protestantism, you are missing out on an awful lot. That’s like saying all food sux because chicken, or beef, sux. If you have a cosmic question, and an attempt at an answer, you’ve got a religion. And some of them are fantastic.


For instance, the Egyptian concept of the soul puts ours to shame. It’s incredibly complex, and addresses far more aspects of life than our simple version of the soul does. But it’s presented and cloaked in simple terms, in what ancient Egyptians had around them every day. So if you judge the book by the cover, you miss the depth in it. It’s a beautiful attempt to explain the questions they were asking, and the observations on life and living that they experienced in their daily lives. The same things we experience, but simply gloss over with some vague, undefined definition of a spirit, or a soul.


Like all human thought, religion evolves, develops, and advances. And so the history of religion is a window into the history of the development of human thought itself.


The questions it tries to answer show the questions that man is trying to answer at different points in history. For instance, a lot of early religions have no creation story. They didn’t care about or even think about where man might have come from.


But then, that question began to be asked. That mental development occurred. Suddenly man could conceive of a time before he was born, and he wanted to know where all men came from. Then creation stories developed. And they were simplistic, sure, but what they show is both the mental development to ask the question, and the mental development to try and answer it. It’s like watching man grow up and become aware of his surroundings and his place in the universe.


Then come the immortality stories. Man realizes he’s going to die. And so the obvious questions are, what’s after this life, and do I really have to leave this life? And what is this life even for? And again, there are multiple attempt to answer that question, of varying complexity.


All those questions and all those answers, collectively, show a complete range of human thought. And it’s pretty broad. The Eastern religions are radically different than our Western religions. In many of their religions, nature IS god, for all intents and purposes.


And you don’t pray to it, you don’t worship it, you simply deal with it. And that’s what religion is to them...learning to deal with a thing you have absolutely no control over and no way to communicate with. You can’t plead with a sunset, or pray to an ocean wave, or commune with growing grass. That’s about 180 degrees from having a god you can talk to, pray to, and who cares about you.


So religion is pretty big. As big as all human thought, really. And it is all man-made, in the sense that it is all man’s attempt to understand what he doesn’t fully understand. But that’s what makes it immensely interesting, and fascinating.


I hope you’ll continue to contribute your thoughts as we go. And I actually hope we disagree on a lot of things. Nothing is more boring and stagnating than a bunch of people all agreeing on the same thing so there’s no exchange of ideas and nothing to really talk about. The fun stuff is figuring out why we think what we think. What questions have we asked ourselves, and what answers work for us, or not?


And your ideas are part of the reason I put these posts out at all.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: On negotiating with God.


May 30, 2022, 8:58 PM
Reply

Once again, I gotta give kudos to you and Tiger1988 for the effort that you put into OPs and responses. Go to the very bottom of my post here for the cliff notes version.

Mr. Fordtunate, perhaps you had (in other posts) revealed your 'status' as a former agonistic, but that chapter of your belief system had escaped me.

From the perspective of another former agnostic (albeit a ~ 15 year agnostic) sandwiched between my times as a beliver ... i.e., my youth as a simple believer (it's easier that way, no doubt) and as an adult as one who belatedly re-embraced of Christianity ... my return to the faith was purposeful nor pursued. In fact, I tried like crazy to remain as an agnostic because of injustices which I saw in both the 'world' overall, and in my personal life (i.e., loss of loved ones at an early age). In other words, I had 'embraced' my petulance and liked the 'image of myself' as a contrarian in a largely Christian / Jewish society.

However, despite my innumerable flaws, I've always done my best to remain honest and to challenge my own beliefs to see if those beliefs were really valid, or if they just comfortable for me.

The essence of my agnosticism was that all matter in the universe is fixed, and that each subatomic particle and sub-sub atomic particle have a mathematical certainty of colliding with other such particles, and that ultimately everything else flows from that basis. An enormous algorithm, so to speak, which pre-ordains everything that ever happened and which will ever happen to both animate and inanimate matter, wave particles / wave movements, etc. etc.. In summary, every action of everything is pre-ordained, including thought (which is a biochemical process).

To my surprise ... on the basis of an accumulation of both inexplicable and unjustifiable (from the Earthly sense) evidence ... I had to accept that there were just too many peculiarities which could not be explained by the agnostic algorithm.

Why am I uniquely aware of me? Why are no other people (or animals / creatures / bacteria / viruses / etc) that are also "me"? Are there any other 'minds or souls' which also inhabit my body and are witnessing everything that happens to me? Why can't that happen? Why can't my mind also 'live' in the body of other people / creatures / etc. of which in the "me" can also be conscious of "them"?

I had to admit that my agnosticism was a simple excuse to be satisfied with everything as being 'it is what it is.'

However, the retreat from agnosticism came from the basics of the existence of the universe. To simply say that it was always there, and never required creation ... I could never reconcile that; it's just too lazy of a concept for even me to accept.

As Forest Gump would say "I am not a smart man" (and thankfully I don't have to be). Rather than arguing about these and other innumerable non-bodily / non-cerebral events / non-personal events, they finally led me (reluctantly) back to some study of the Bible, and then to actually the Book of Mormon (which was interesting, with some really good philosophies, but that I could not embrace from believing the 'golden plates on Joseph Smith's farm in / near Palmyra, NY story), and a preliminary (but long interrupted) reading of the Quran. The Bible didn't really hit with me until I got off my duff and read it from beginning to end (like anyone should read a book). The contradictions within the Bible then became understandable, and the errors of the best intentioned 'human hand' in writing and editing the Bible became explicable in my mind.

In the end, the re-establishment of (some) humility brought me to accept that which is obvious to others in terms of faith and the presence of a greater power. I'm a believer again.

OK, to skip all of the in between stuff, I appreciate your posts.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Why then, do I love you so?***


May 27, 2022, 11:52 AM [ in reply to Re: On negotiating with God. ]
Reply



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why then, do I love you so?***


May 27, 2022, 1:09 PM
Reply

Forgot to tag you last post anonymouse


And that's a great, and very acute reply, 88.


Love is another great mystery. It's a small 4 letter words with a lot of meaning, because there are a lot of types of love and what is "it" anyhow? Is it a tangible thing in any way, perhaps that we cannot perceive because I don't have a dedicated "Love detector?" Lol.


I mean, I can't see it, I can't smell it, I can't taste it, yet I know when it is in me. How can I feel it if I can't sense it with my 5 senses? And what else in the universe is like that? Maybe God? Another mystery.


I can even see it in others. You can actually tell when two people look at each other and are in love. My grandma was great at it. Now, love may change over time, it might mature, and lust might be one aspect of it, as may admiration, respect, warmth, and a whole lot of other things, but whatever it is that we call "love" exists, even if we can't put it in a nice, tidy box and give it a permanent label.


And the same goes with tons of other emotions, and other aspects of life, for that matter. What causes sacrifice? Why is it that among otherwise selfish (not necessarily in a bad, but in a preservation way) animals, do we sometimes override that instinct and give of ourselves for others? More mystery.


Anyway, if you decide to pitch in to the conversation Anonymouse, I view these posts as sort of a "show and tell" of existence. As in, "look what I discovered", or, "this is how I see it", or, it seems this way to me.


Everyone is going to make the choices and decisions that satisfy their own experience of the universe, but that surely doesn't mean others can't give you their insights too, and vice versa. 4 eyes is better than 2, and six eyes better still. And there's a lot of mystery to uncover, so the more people working on it the better.


Even if you don't sense any of it, that's still a valuable response in terms of understanding, too. Why would it be that one person experiences something and another doesn't? And though it seems there might just be one answer to a question, there are often multiple answers. People generally don't just make shid up, so if they feel something they know they feel it, and they want to understand it.


I see this as a group of people eating different meals at the table. You may be perfectly fine with what you are eating, but you might also might be curious at what the other guy's food tastes like. You may not even want to taste it, but you might want him to at least describe it to you. And hopefully, it's different food, because you already know what your own food tastes like, and what would be the point of having him describe that to you? So welcome!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 22
| visibility 1
General Boards - Religion & Philosophy
add New Topic