|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
All-Pro [667]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 768
Joined: 8/6/04
|
He was out of bounds
Sep 19, 2013, 11:52 PM
|
|
|
|
shoulda worn the 11.5D not EE
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6931]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10242
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Point*
Sep 20, 2013, 12:01 AM
|
|
Nm
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [621]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 662
Joined: 9/13/03
|
Re: He was out of bounds
Sep 20, 2013, 12:03 AM
|
|
if he was out, why is it green all around his shoe? maybe distort the pixels a little more a you'll feel better. go tigers
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11934]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 16363
Joined: 11/30/98
|
LOL ...
Sep 20, 2013, 12:06 AM
|
|
Officials call right on the field ain't good enough ... then photographic proof of what the official saw up close ain't good enough either.
You just want to see him in bounds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1617]
TigerPulse: 93%
Posts: 1787
Joined: 10/11/08
|
Re: He was out of bounds
Sep 20, 2013, 12:07 AM
[ in reply to Re: He was out of bounds ] |
|
Because it isn't. You are seeing the cleats and lines on the shoe. What you need to look at is the white line. The part where it isn't straight, the shoe is over it, which is why it isn't straight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Savant [460]
TigerPulse: 51%
Posts: 700
Joined: 8/1/08
|
umm...no
Sep 20, 2013, 3:42 AM
|
|
But we win so on to the next win. This was good for us no matter what non tigers are saying. I do have deep concerns though...very deep
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [444]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 535
Joined: 6/30/11
|
Oh. That is simple.
Sep 20, 2013, 12:07 AM
[ in reply to Re: He was out of bounds ] |
|
A shadow is an area where direct light from a light source cannot reach due to obstruction by an object. It occupies all of the space behind an opaque object with light in front of it. The cross section of a shadow is a two-dimensional silhouette, or reverse projection of the object blocking the light. The sun causes many objects to have shadows and at certain times of the day, when the sun is at certain heights, the lengths of shadows change.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shadow
Look it up if you need to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [621]
TigerPulse: 66%
Posts: 662
Joined: 9/13/03
|
Re: Oh. That is simple.
Sep 20, 2013, 12:10 AM
|
|
i appreciate the effort, but you guys are reaching, go back to the hd full replay and you'll agree with levy, palmer, pollack, davis, and the rest of the un-biased world
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
Are saying the referees are biased?***
Sep 20, 2013, 12:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Letterman [264]
TigerPulse: 98%
Posts: 477
Joined: 11/10/01
|
Re: Oh. That is simple.
Sep 20, 2013, 12:38 AM
[ in reply to Re: Oh. That is simple. ] |
|
> i appreciate the effort, but you guys are reaching,
> go back to the hd full replay and you'll agree with
> levy, palmer, pollack, davis, and the rest of the
> un-biased world
If you look at the video replay you can clearly see the foot on the line. The correct call was made,
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [583]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 444
Joined: 9/10/06
|
Re: Oh. That is simple.
Sep 20, 2013, 1:44 AM
[ in reply to Re: Oh. That is simple. ] |
|
This is a picture directly off of a full HD replay. I pulled it up from my DVR copy because the image does look weird where his shoe is, but that is exactly how it appears on the HD game footage. Look at the first replay after they realize it's going to be reviewed when it hits 7:36 left in the third quarter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2753]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5047
Joined: 10/18/06
|
Actually, no, you won't . . .
Sep 20, 2013, 2:11 AM
[ in reply to Re: Oh. That is simple. ] |
|
The replay angles that were close up weren't conclusive b/c the step in question from a ground level (closer) shot, was obscured by the head/hat of someone on the sidelines. The angle the announcers used to comment on - the only one where you could see that step hit the ground, was from farther away, above, and from the opposite direction, and you simply could not see the area in question with certainty or clarity. From that shot, it looked like he was in, but this photo is closer and at a better angle, without the obscurity of the ground level shot, and without the distance and poor angle of the overhead shot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
If he didn't touch it then it is literally about as close as
Sep 20, 2013, 12:09 AM
[ in reply to Re: He was out of bounds ] |
|
you can possibly get, meaning the call could go either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junkie [590]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 1615
Joined: 10/4/09
|
Re: If he didn't touch it then it is literally about as close as
Sep 20, 2013, 12:22 AM
|
|
That was the first run flipped horizontal. If you copy that picture to paint, go to rotate and flip horizontal you will see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10871]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 12937
Joined: 4/18/12
|
So he was wearing the number '01' LOL
Sep 20, 2013, 12:45 AM
|
|
You're trying to hard....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-American [583]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 444
Joined: 9/10/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2753]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 5047
Joined: 10/18/06
|
IT'S NOT GREEN AROUND HIS SHOE
Sep 20, 2013, 2:04 AM
[ in reply to Re: He was out of bounds ] |
|
It's black around his shoe. The shadow or contrast lining the edge of his shoe all around is black, not green. You can tell b/c that same black contrast/shadow extends to the heel of his shoe, a part which is clearly over the grass, and yet at that place, you can see the contrast between the green and the black. The same contrast on the right side is not the grass, but that same black contrast.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [196]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 258
Joined: 1/8/07
|
Re: He was out of bounds
Sep 20, 2013, 12:38 AM
|
|
I was at the game and EVERYONE around me (CU section) was shocked and happy but dude was in bounds the entire way. Can't argue it really.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [17306]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7066
Joined: 12/14/98
|
LOL. Being at the game, you are saying you had a better
Sep 20, 2013, 1:35 AM
|
|
view than a still close up camera shot?
You must have had some great seats on the NC State bench.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 18
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
