Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
All-In [26467]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 20616
Joined: 9/2/02
|
No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 9:34 AM
|
|
That's pretty unbelievable stat.
Good job Wake.
|
|
|
|
110%er [8047]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6805
Joined: 10/16/09
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 9:41 AM
|
|
You got that right. Go back and watch the tape, lots of holding on the inside. I counted at least 6 takedowns during the game. The other thing that A gap mesh does is screen the officials from seeing the holding inside. It was pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2403]
TigerPulse: 72%
Posts: 4092
Joined: 4/12/10
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 12:58 PM
|
|
I didn't notice anything but the take downs . . which should be easy to see.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4151]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 4954
Joined: 6/28/10
|
I sense sarcasm. They were holding all day, the officals
Sep 25, 2022, 9:41 AM
|
|
Were all to busy paying attention to our Corner backs to call the holding calls.
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [495]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 651
Joined: 11/6/15
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 9:41 AM
|
|
Bad job referees. FTFY.
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [197]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 199
Joined: 1/14/09
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 9:44 AM
|
|
That's why Breese's dad was going crazy at the end of the game. He wanted a holding call like I did.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1037]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 2060
Joined: 4/7/22
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 10:08 AM
|
|
No. He was mocking the refs about throwing a flag for pass interference on the final play, since they called so many during the game.
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21815]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 15701
Joined: 10/23/12
|
No holding and multiple no calls on clear PI
Sep 25, 2022, 9:46 AM
|
|
Or defensive holding on awake.
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [58367]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 46309
Joined: 4/23/00
|
Refs don't have time for 'holding". They consciously,
Sep 25, 2022, 10:02 AM
|
|
intentionally have decided to ignore most holding violations. As a result, most teams hold on every play. Some teams are worse than others, as it benefits them more than others due to scheme and talent (or lack thereof).
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19802
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Not one to say there was a PLAN
Sep 25, 2022, 10:29 AM
|
|
But when not a single holding call is made, THERE WAS A PLAN. They usually call one early on, just to let em know they watching
Also, HALF of the PI calls were ticky tac type calls,but WERE NOT called both ways.
Research Triangle Officiating.
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3375]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5019
Joined: 4/12/01
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 10:38 AM
|
|
Think it was on WFs last OT series, saw Bresee get taken down from behind in a clear view of everyone. Hope film is sent to that dild0 in charge of officials in the sucka$$ ACC office.
Message was edited by: BerlinSPY73®
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53716]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43532
Joined: 11/17/03
|
It will be handled internally. LOL.***
Sep 25, 2022, 10:45 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [219]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 436
Joined: 11/19/03
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 11:36 AM
|
|
How about the targeting call which thank God was overturned because it was false but we still got a penalty. I’m not kidding I don’t know who hires these refs but they usually don’t do Clemson any favors
|
|
|
|
|
Team Captain [489]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 520
Joined: 9/27/14
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 12:30 PM
|
|
I was at the game so I didn't hear commentary. It was called a personal foul with targeting. Replay overturned it so where was the personal foul if targeting was overturned?
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23100]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19802
Joined: 1/15/11
|
Save face call
Sep 25, 2022, 12:35 PM
[ in reply to Re: No holding penalties on Wake ?? ] |
|
They called late hit/personal foul WITH targeting.
Pure BS. Hit wasn't late no matter how SLOOOOOW you replay it.
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6974]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6349
Joined: 9/21/04
|
Re: No holding penalties on Wake ??
Sep 25, 2022, 12:32 PM
|
|
Yep no holding, no targeting, no false starts. Refs were hell-bent on keeping Wake in that game
|
|
|
|
Replies: 15
| visibility 1
|
|
|