Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Why there's no QB "controversy"
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 28
| visibility 1

Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 11:12 AM

Watson looks great--running the plays he knows. He does not know the whole playbook. Stoudt does. That's just a product of being in the offense for 4 years vs less than 1 year.

What Watson brings to the table in better mobility we lose in the volume of plays we can call. I don't think Stoudt would've escaped the pocket on that play Watson got a first down but I don't think they could've called the zone-read, WR option play that we scored on with Watson either. Making Watson the starter will unfortunately make game planning for opposing D-coordinators easier. That's just the reality of where he is right now.

I'm not a fan of the "two-QB" system but I think, as long as Stoudt continues to be a solid game manager and Watson can get meaningful (i.e. not mop-up time) reps, then this strategy will pay off more in the long run.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Those that vehemently want Watson, run along now


Sep 7, 2014, 11:17 AM

This post has too much intelligence for you to understand. You will only hurt yourself.

Tesla

2005_ncaa_champ.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've been wrong two times, but this isn't one of them.


Surely no one wants watson to be named the starter right now


Sep 7, 2014, 12:28 PM

Stoudt should be the starter against fsu but we will lose at fsu if there's a repeat of the Georgia game. It doesn't make since for stoudt to start struggling and you put in watson only to watch him score a touchdown in 3 plays then you take him out of the game until it was over and cole stoudt went producing. You feed the hot hand, I don't care about this starter crap but that was extremely frustrating if ones playing much better than the other you keep him in, forcing cole out there is going to nothing but hurt him and as you saw yesterday there was a lot of high balls especially early yesterday that are arguably a product of the Georgia game but he finally got. Them controlled and went back to his old self. You can't tell me that wasn't frustrating to watch in the Georgia game to say the least.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You hit the nail on the head!***


Sep 7, 2014, 11:20 AM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I'm a fan of whatever works. Typically, I don't favor a 2 QB


Sep 7, 2014, 11:26 AM

system, mainly because it often results in poor leadership, affects team morale, and never allows either QB to get into a flow. I don't see any of that in this case, and I think that's a credit to the maturity and character of both Stoudt and Watson, as well as the ability of Dabo to get his players "all in".

2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want, and deserve to get it good and hard."
- H. L. Mencken


Re: I'm a fan of whatever works. Typically, I don't favor a 2 QB


Sep 7, 2014, 11:33 AM

Tim Tebow says hello. Worked pretty well in Gatorville. Watson is perhaps as good as glamor boy.
I like the system we are using now. In the long run it will play huge dividends. Good job Dabo

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

My view exactly


Sep 7, 2014, 11:50 AM [ in reply to I'm a fan of whatever works. Typically, I don't favor a 2 QB ]

It benefits us only because of Stoudt's maturity. His maturity is what is allowing Watson to get good experience and tutelage. Imagine if we had a Chad Kelly type as our 5th year QB... this situation would end in a dumpster fire. The knee-jerk fans (emphasis on JERK) need to slow their roll and appreciate Stoudt.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: My view exactly


Sep 7, 2014, 11:56 AM

Who knows exactly how much of the play book that Watson has d

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: My view exactly


Sep 7, 2014, 12:07 PM

Has down? Our system is very qb friendly as far as understanding the reads and learning the plays. I like stoudt but Watson is better. It sounds simple but it is that simple. Watson scored every time he got a drive yesterday. Stoudt threw bad balls all day. Yeah his stats look pretty good. But he could have had 3 picks yesterday. In two weeks they will took advantage of. He can't through quick hits to receivers against FSU. And as far as the play book goes I will always take quality over quantity..

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

As the season progresses, I see Watson get an increasing


Sep 7, 2014, 11:34 AM

share of the snaps. He clearly has more raw talent than Cole, and if that were the only criteria, he would be the starter. Dabo is looking beyond the next game and this season. I think that is the right thing to do, and it is what good coaches and CEO's do. He is preparing Watson for the longer term. I stand behind him on this decision 100%.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 11:37 AM

the only controversy is if there were to be dissension on the team. I do not see this, cole and watson were laughing and carrying on on the bench together and are the first ones to pat each other's helmets on the sideline after a score.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

That's not true, DW gives DC's more to worry about b/c he is


Sep 7, 2014, 11:51 AM

a real running threat. But he can also throw it really well.

WE don't need to get that complicated, in fact I think sometimes we're too complicated.

I like Stoudt and hope he does really well, but he doesn't move well, even in the pocket, and that's make him easier to pressure (esp with our OL) and makes defending him easier.

Aub's offense is pretty simple, but it works when you have physically gifted players running it.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 11:59 AM

So you're saying, when Morris is on the sideline calling plays in and Watson is on the sideline behind him, that Watson hears some of those plays and don't know what they are? Has Morris said that Watson doesn't know the whole playbook? Seems a bit far to me. Does this offense really need a game manager? This offense is based on big plays, always has been. I think it's very obvious who makes those plays for this offense

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 12:02 PM

Watson wouldn't have escaped that were it FSU.... Their D is a bit faster

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

We do Chicken right...it's not just for frying anymore!


Re: Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 2:17 PM

If it were FSU, Cole would've thrown three interceptions

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Why there's no QB "controversy"


Sep 7, 2014, 12:49 PM

Yeah imagine what we would have looked like in the UGA game without the whole playbook to call. I bet we wouldn't have scored any points and only gotten 1 1st down rushing. You really think every QB on our roster can't run that triple option.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Here we go again...


Sep 7, 2014, 12:58 PM

Once again....


Please. Please stop with this...
"Stoudt knows the play book better" -really, just stop.
Just because you KNOW the play book, doesn't mean you
can execute it. I am quite sure he is more limited than
you think, on the plays he can run.

Not saying to throw Cole to the curve. And he HAS played
"Ok". But he is limited as well.


Thanks, and have a great day :)
#21

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nailed it


Sep 7, 2014, 1:23 PM

I'm not convinced that stoudt is capable of running any plays that Watson is not. Stoudt may know what the plays are but if you pay attention to the difference in the play calling and execution when cole is in the game vs when Watson is in it is is clear that cole is limited on what he can do.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Watson played in the same system in high school...


Sep 7, 2014, 1:24 PM

So Watson is in his fifth year in the system and Stoudt is in his fourth. So Watson has an extra year in this system over Stoudt.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

When the media calls it the "same system" they don't mean


Sep 7, 2014, 1:35 PM

he was playing in the exact same offense. They mean he was playing in the same type of spread-misdirection offense.

High school offenses are a far cry from college offenses just like college offenses are JV compared to NFL offenses.

From a simple standpoint of learning the entire playbook, Watson is at a huge disadvantage. You certainly don't believe that he was using the same playbook back at Gainesville, GA do you?

It's also a matter of experience with the other players on the first team offense. Although considering the number of freshmen and that Watson enrolled in January makes that point much less significant.




badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When the media calls it the "same system" they don't mean


Sep 7, 2014, 1:48 PM

http://www.postandcourier.com/article/20131223/PC20/131229746

i believe it's much closer than you think & i'd imagine swinney/morris have spent many hours sharing with the gainseville coaches over the years.

the phrase used in the piece is "nearly identical".

the biggest differences for deshaun are probably the "world he now lives, adapting to college", the defensive speed, ability, design and adjusting to teammates on and off the field; he doesn't seem to lack in much of it, but the coaches are putting him in the best possible situations to "win".




2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Great article. Thanks for the link.


Sep 7, 2014, 2:29 PM

It seems that the similarities between the two offenses goes well beyond my initial oversimplification. It isn't simply a situation of both offenses being a HUNH misdirection based spread.


I appreciate the information, and also the fact that you sent me the link without being argumentative or condescending. As you well know, there are a small number of poster on Tnet who at times it can seem spend their lives just looking for someone to post something incorrect so that they can call them out.

A portion of my original point still stands though. However similar the Gainesville High system is to the Clemson offense under Chad Morris, in general, the size of the playbook of the high school offense would be considerably smaller than the college playbook.

I would also be extremely surprised if the terminology under Coach Morris isn't nearly completely different than Gainesville High School.

However, even with the necessity of learning all new terminology and learning considerably more total plays, the value of playing in an offense that utilizes the same concepts is practically invaluable. Also, his January enrollment gave him a tremendous head start.


Although it has no bearing on what happens at this point and it wouldn't be possible given the private nature of playbooks, it would be interesting to actually compare the two playbooks and see specifically how the P&C journalist defines "nearly identical".



Although this is getting a little long, and I need to get back to watching the collection of former Tigers in Buffalo beat up on the Chicago Bears, I want to make it clear that I am in no way supporting a QB change where Watson supplants Stoudt as the starter.

I've never been a fan of a two QB system, but I think that there's a possibility that it could possibly be beneficial for our offense. At the very least, it forces the opposing defensive coordinators to have to game-plan against two different versions of our offense.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: When the media calls it the "same system" they don't mean


Sep 7, 2014, 2:07 PM [ in reply to When the media calls it the "same system" they don't mean ]

Some of the terminology and things like blocking schemes and motions may be a little different but I would bet that the base of the offense is pretty similar to what Watson ran in HS and wouldn't be surprised if it was the same.

Let's not forget Chad was a HS coach and brought the same system he was running in HS to clemson.

Also Watson has been touted as being very intelligent and quick to pick up things so I'm sure that after 7 months of studying the play book he knows plenty to successfully run any play chad calls. I'm not sure anyone knows chads entire play book other than chad. Remember just last year chad had to simplify the play calling and play book for 3yr starter Boyd.

Also, position player wise Cole has very little game time experience with any of the current players over Watson, and our best play makers were either injured last year or are freshmen so the argument that cole has more experience with the first team offense is pretty much non-existent.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Good points (long)


Sep 7, 2014, 7:06 PM

I apologize for the length of this response, but my power just went out and during the thunderstorm and I'm limited to my laptop with a tethered connection via my cellphone.



I completely agree that the experience with the first team offense between Stoudt and Watson is much less significant than it would typically be when comparing a true freshman with a senior. I don't think it would be so negligible that it shouldn't be taken into consideration at all however.


Stoudt does have the advantage of having been named the starter in the spring and therefore has been receiving the vast majority of reps with the first team offense for the past six months. While that is a far cry from having an actual season of experience as the starter, I think it's important not to dismiss it altogether.



As far as your point about knowledge of the playbook, I agree that you're spot on about Morris being the only one who is familiar with it entirely. I remember his comments in at least 2 of the past 3 years where he gave an estimate about the percentage of the offense that had actually been installed. I seem to remember being a bit surprised one season where Morris mentioned that even nearing the end of September one season, he estimated that only about 60 percent of the offense had been installed.


Regardless of whether any of the players know the entire playbook or just how much of it they know, it would be extremely hard to believe that Watson has the same amount of familiarity as Stoudt. His early enrollment and ability to learn quickly have given him a huge advantage, but 8 months simply is not enough time to gain the same amount of knowledge as Stoudt has learned in nearly 4 years. Not to mention that learning the plays on paper is a far cry from learning the plays and then practicing them on the field.

While Watson may be able to successfully run enough of the offense to compete with certain opponents, there's simply no way that he would have the same number of plays available to him as Stoudt would have. The fact that Morris had to reduce the size any complexity of the offense last year with a third year starter only provides further evidence that Stoudt would have the clear advantage in understanding and knowing more of the offense than Watson. That is in no way a knock on Watson at all, it's just simply too much to expect. For a true freshman, he's done nothing but show himself to be a very rare talent in terms of physical ability and understanding of the game.




While it's no secret that Morris was initially brought into the college ranks as the OC at Tulsa after a successful career as a high school coach in Texas, it's not as though Morris is using the exact offense he was running during his last year at Lake Travis.


Morris is constantly working on his offense by adding new wrinkles from adjustments in blocking scheme to changes in pre-snap motion. In fact, prior to 2004, Morris had a very successful coaching career using a more old fashioned I-formation offense that was the complete opposite of the spread he uses today. It wasn't until he got hired to replace a coaching legend at Stephensville High School and completely missed the playoffs that he realized he would have to adapt his offense.

As Morris tells it, he simply picked up the phone and called a well-known high school coach from Arkansas who was having unprecedented success with his unique offense. Over the course of several months, this Malzahn guy taught Morris and his assistants his unique version of the HUNH spread that included elements of the old-fashioned wing-T, veer, and triple option, which developed into the Wildcat and a RichRod inspired Zone Read.

After implementing this new offense, Morris won multiple state championships and averaged less than 1 loss per season for the rest of his time as a high school coach. His success using the system he learned from Malzahn ultimately led to his hire as the offensive coordinator at Tulsa after Malzahn himself recommended Morris to the Tulsa AD.

All this to say, it was only 10 years ago when Chad Morris was introduced to the spread HUNH. In the decade since he has undoubtedly became much more efficient and adapted his offense from an exact copy of Malzahn to his own version.

So while it's true that he was a HS coach that brought his offense the Clemson, the current system has undergone significant changes than the one he was running back at Lake Travis.

Considering that Malzahn literally wrote the book on HUNH spread offenses, and hundreds of HS coaches throughout the nation attempted to install the same offense at their own high schools leads me to believe that if the simplified version of the Malzahn offense being run all over the country in high school were so similar to the ones run by Malzahn and Morris, then there would be a whole lot more successful high school coaches being hired by colleges.


I'm interested to look into how closely Gainesville High School's offense is to the Clemson offense under Chad Morris, but I can't help but believe that it would be more likely to resemble the offense run by Morris and Malzahn a decade ago after Malzahn's book than the offense in it's current implementation. Of course this is all just speculation at this point while I wait for my power to come back.

Once again, sorry for the length and getting so far off topic.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

TU, great response.


Sep 7, 2014, 8:43 PM

You may be 100% right in everything you stated but simply for arguments sake I have some thoughts on the points you made.

I understand where you are coming with your points on the offense being different than when Morris ran his offense in high school based on him constantly changing and adding components.

This would take some time for Watson to learn the differences. At the same time however Cole is having to learn the new aspects implemented each year and re-learn plays with new terminology so he may have a slight advantage but its not like Cole has been practicing in the exact same offense each of the 4 yrs. If you recall prior to last season the entire playbook was revamped with all new terminology to supposedly help run more plays each game.

As far as Cole getting the most starts with the first team offense over the spring and summer I believe that both QB's probably received pretty equal reps through both camps. With the competition early on and the coaches knowing going into the fall that Watson was going to play in the games too I believe they would have given the QB's about the same amount of reps. Cole may have gotten a few more but not many.

And lastly even though Cole may have knowledge of more plays than Deshaun I feel that Cole does not have the capability to run all the plays he may know. If Watson is capable of successfully running all the plays he has learned, and the plays that Cole can't (more mobile plays), then I believe that the two QB's are a lot closer in the playbook knowledge debate than most like to believe.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

who said he didn't know the playbook?***


Sep 7, 2014, 3:41 PM



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What amazes me is how a lot of our posters obviously know


Sep 7, 2014, 8:49 PM

A lot more about football than our coaches do. According to some our our experts, Dabo is guilty of being loyal therefore he insists starting Stout rather than Watson. I guess Dabo is saying to hell with my job security, my future pay, and my won/loss record. I insist on Cole although I know Watson should start!

Grow up you arm chair quarterbacks. Dabo will do what he thinks will make us win.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What about all the QB run plays we could call with Watson???


Sep 7, 2014, 8:52 PM

Auburn says hello.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cole shoulda easily had 3 picks


Sep 7, 2014, 10:30 PM

just saying

if you don't believe me watch the replay

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 28
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic