Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Please convince me otherwise
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 18
| visibility 1,778

Please convince me otherwise


Aug 15, 2013, 12:36 PM

Ive been going back in forth in my mind on whether or not we beat UGA but im starting to get a little worried and not as confident as I was a couple months ago.
Here is what worries me about this game

Comparing the two teams this is what I come up with

Offensively I think UGA has the slight edge:
QB- even
RB- UGA
OLine-UGA
WRs- Clemson
TE- uga

Defense I would have to say even or a toss up
dline- were more experienced but uga may have more raw talent
LB- on paper we should have advantage but until steward and Anthony play to there potential im not convinced
Secondary- Think both teams have young talent and we wont know until we see the field.

Im thinking to win some things will have to go our way. I think its a bad matchup for our defense just because we struggle with good passing teams, I think we can slow down gurshall like we did with lsu run game and usucks run game but uga will put up some points. Im praying the homefield advantage with ugas young defense we can start out hot like usuck did last year. 2 more weeks!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tell em coot!***


Aug 15, 2013, 12:42 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You could be right - since this is the first game for both..


Aug 15, 2013, 12:49 PM

teams it's hard to say has the edge.

If we win it will be a high-scoring game - don't think our defense will be ready in the first game of the season to hold them down.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Please convince me otherwise


Aug 15, 2013, 12:49 PM

You leave out a few HUGE factors.. The FANS... First game of the season.. GameDay.. 8:00 kick off.. The crowd will be electric.. Even more so that the GT game a few years back. Being the first game of the year.. That will be a huge factor for UGA.. This team will be ready to play.

If our Defense steps up and plays ball.. We win. That simple.

We get a late TD to make double digits and lock it up..


Clemson 38
UGA 27

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Like your numbers. +1.***


Aug 15, 2013, 12:51 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: Please convince me otherwise


Aug 15, 2013, 12:51 PM

We beat them easily. Our head coach is the difference. You can't stop Dabo.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tell em, coot!***


Aug 15, 2013, 12:53 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Unless your name is Steve Spurrier.***


Aug 15, 2013, 2:20 PM [ in reply to Re: Please convince me otherwise ]



military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

will there be no special teams play in this game?


Aug 15, 2013, 12:53 PM

if so, you don't mention it.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thank you.


Aug 15, 2013, 12:55 PM

Special teams and turnovers will decide this game...IMO.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

didn't change winner in bowl game


Aug 15, 2013, 12:57 PM [ in reply to will there be no special teams play in this game? ]

We got DOMINATED on special teams, and lost the turnover battle.

The only good thing from either was the winning FG.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


eh, no...


Aug 15, 2013, 12:57 PM

On offense, you're about right, but you have to give different weight based on what's going to make a difference in the game. So here's what I think:

Offense

QB- Even, with slight edge to Boyd because of home field advantage and running ability.

RB- Georgia, but Clemson is going to get its yards. Georgia has the proven talent, but I don't think this is going to be a huge factor.

OL- Only slight to Georgia. Clemson's OL produced more rushing yards last year, and gave up about the same number of sacks as Georgia's did.

WRs (including TEs) - Clemson, but not as large as a lot of people think.

Defense

DL- Clemson. The Tigers return a bunch of guys on a deep DL that was tough against the run at the end of the year. Georgia was brutalized by hard- nosed running teams last year. Clemson also returns far more sacks on the DL than Georgia does (although UGA tends to have more sacks by LBs in their 3-4 scheme). I'm not really sure that Georgia has more "raw talent" on their line, either, considering how highly rated guys like Crawford, Watkins, and Watson were.

LB- Clemson. Clemson has more talent and depth here than Georgia does. Even if you're not convinced about Clemson's LBs, what would convince you about Georgia's LBs?

DB- Both are not great, but Clemson has more returning experience so I think you have to give the nod to them.


Overall:

Offense- Even, with slight edge to Clemson because playing at home.

Defense- Clemson, both because playing at home and because they're more experienced.

That said, neither advantage for Clemson is all that large, so Clemson is going to need one of their best games. Yes, UGA is going to move the ball, but as long as Clemson victimizes UGA's weaknesses like they've done with so many other teams over the last couple years, Clemson should be in position to win the game.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: eh, no...


Aug 15, 2013, 3:46 PM

i'm glad they're going to play the game because there is only so much you can analyze, especially before either team has played a game....

for the record, i'll give UGA a bigger advantage at RB and OL because they're returning proven experience.... BUT, this all comes down to the defense on the other side of the ball, which is an unknown for both teams. Some would favor Clemson because some of the returning players, but freshman and jucos can make an immediate implact in some defensive positions, which could make UGA better than you think.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Please convince yourself (link)


Aug 15, 2013, 1:06 PM

because apparently your opinion has changed.

http://www.tigernet.com/forums/message.jspa?messageID=14067425#14067425

Plus who cares about kickers or punters?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

the key to the game


Aug 15, 2013, 1:18 PM

The team that scores the most points will win the game......

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson strengths match up to UGa's weaknesses moreso


Aug 15, 2013, 2:35 PM

than vice versa. DB's are inexperienced and thin at UGa, QB/Wr's are experienced and explosive at Clemson.

UGa will want to run, Clemson is okay there, not great. UGa is more balanced on offense, but Clemson's defense is better overall than last yr.

Punt and kick coverage will be important, b/c we sucked at it last yr and UGa is good at returns.

THe advantage is not large, though, so field position, turnovers, penalties could negate it.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

well ....you can see how good UGA is


Aug 15, 2013, 2:44 PM

after we play them.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Josh Harvey-Clemons


Aug 15, 2013, 4:07 PM

He is the leader of their defense now. I believe he led the team in yesterday's scrimmage. He is suspended for our game but they need to practice him becuase they have to be ready for USuC a week later. His absence and the very young DB's they will have starting is going to be the difference in this game. Our offense is going to get rolling and wear them out physically.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Josh Harvey-Clemons


Aug 15, 2013, 4:07 PM

led the team "in tackles".

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 18
| visibility 1,778
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic