|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Coot defense...
Nov 23, 2016, 6:04 PM
|
|
Are their 24 TO's a reflection of how dominate their D is or are the teams that they have played that pitiful?
Sirius replies only
Tia
|
|
|
|
 |
110%er [6662]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9535
Joined: 1/16/99
|
Re: Coot defense...
Nov 23, 2016, 6:13 PM
|
|
15 turnovers from UMass, Western Carolina, Tennessee, and Missouri. The offense has to pull it together and hold on to the ball. It's that simple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scout Team [175]
TigerPulse: 61%
Posts: 559
Joined: 10/10/11
|
Re: Coot defense...
Nov 23, 2016, 8:18 PM
|
|
I think East Carolina had four turnovers in the red zone. Their quarterback was just too anxious to finish the plays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1465]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 1624
Joined: 6/27/02
|
Some national D1 stats to ponder after 11 games . . . . . .
Nov 23, 2016, 6:34 PM
|
|
Clemson Def vs SC Offense
3rd Down D 6 vs 107
1st down D 22 vs 108
Rushing D 23 vs 106
Passing D 15 vs 91
Total D 13 vs 114
Scoring D 10 vs 118
Red Zone D 18 vs 85
Sacks D 4 vs 113
TFL 3 vs 118
Clemson Offense vs SC Def
3rd Down O 10 vs 76
1st Down O 13 vs 70
Rushing O 76 vs 86
Passing O 9 vs 17
Total O 18 vs 50
Scoring O 18 vs 27
Red Zone O 80 vs 10
Sacks 16 vs 81
TFL 17 vs 79
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40925]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42941
Joined: 11/30/98
|
turnovers coots +10, Clemson -1***
Nov 23, 2016, 8:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8095]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10944
Joined: 2/10/11
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51530]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43077
Joined: 8/10/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [56]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 79
Joined: 11/18/15
|
Re: Coot defense...
Nov 23, 2016, 8:28 PM
|
|
Eh. Product of the teams they've played.
Wake Forest TECHNICALLY has a better defense than Carolina.
#notafraid
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I think their defense has been playing better...
Nov 23, 2016, 8:31 PM
|
|
as the season progressed (most other teams should as well). Plus, the coots have a lot of senior leadership on defense, so I would expect them to be stronger on that side of the ball. I don't think anyone could honestly argue that Muschamp has not had tough defenses wherever he has been.
The key to our play against their defense will be the following in order of priority:
1) Success running the ball (including Watson)
2) No dropped passes on key 3rd downs
3) No turnovers
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [56]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 79
Joined: 11/18/15
|
Re: I think their defense has been playing better...
Nov 23, 2016, 8:38 PM
|
|
They actually regressed a little since the offense has gotten better.
Two sided story as WCU was the first team to put 30+ points on their defense, but they've also played a lot of statistically PUTRID offenses (Vandy, UK, MissSt)
They will play tough because they want to gauge their level of program progress. Earlier this year, there were NO gamecock fans or alumni who even cared about this team, much less thought they had a chance at beating Clemson in DV.
Also, a 2-8 fcs Western Carolina team put up over 250 yards rushing on the coots. If we don't have a similar or more rushing performance, I will be highly surprised.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [629]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 752
Joined: 6/30/15
|
Re: I think their defense has been playing better...
Nov 23, 2016, 9:05 PM
|
|
I think the guys come out hangry for some chicken  I do agree that the game will only be close if we turn the ball over. On the flip side though, DW did say he would not lose to Scar so I am very confident he will keep his word. We got this.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3820]
TigerPulse: 82%
Posts: 4395
Joined: 12/24/09
|
let's see: Vandy, Miss St, East Carolina, Kentucky, UGA,
Nov 23, 2016, 10:39 PM
|
|
UMass, Mizzou and Western Carolina.
kind of speaks for itself, don't it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 11
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
