Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 26
| visibility 1

I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 6:35 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XyyKZH12pSI

It depends on what your goals / vision are for Clemson the next 4-5 years.

If you want to continue playing on the national stage for National Championships, then, this class didn't cut it.

If you want to be an upper echelon ACC team, then this class is right on target.

Some argue this class isnt done ... well, its done for 4 and 5 star players. Clemson is way too late to the party on these highly rated prospects, and Clemson's NIL program is where ? Where is it ?

The 2022 class will be finished with low 3 star and 2 star players (insert Renfrow reference here - exception, not the rule) ... and there will be a lot of walk-on scholarships handed out.

Lawson is the first clue ... way undersized DE ... he will need to live in the weight room for 2 years before ever sniffing the field.

It looks like Dabo was asleep at the wheel this year. Not sure what happened but let's remember he makes 8 million a year not to nap on recruiting.

South Carolina battles East Carolina and Toledo for recruits, not Clemson.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 6:46 PM

Undersized, you remember Rob Bodine?

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

There is always an exception.***


Dec 21, 2021, 7:27 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Thanks Coach!***


Dec 21, 2021, 6:55 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Thanks Coach!***


Dec 21, 2021, 6:59 PM

Impossible to rank/grade this class this early. In a year or two we will know how good or bad it was. I’m kind of glad we have this Dude named Dabo working to develop this next group of champions.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 7:00 PM

Lmfao everyone forgets the dandy dozen

2024 orange level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dandy dozen = 1 div. title / 1 conference title / 0 Nattys


Dec 21, 2021, 7:08 PM

Are we in rebuild mode ?

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Recall, that was the start of turning the corner on recruits


Dec 21, 2021, 7:30 PM

So the cupboard was bear to start with. That is not the case with this class. We have some really good talent already here and if we augment this class with some solid 3s that have potential to blossom and some transfer portal guys and have a really good year with our new coordinators, the recruiting class next year will be large and plentiful.

It will take two years like this past one to really cause concern. Ideally we shouldn’t have had this one this year, but no need to cry over spilled milk. It is what it is and the worst part is behind us now. Once this group of coaches settle in and demonstrate we ain’t going nowhere but up, the next time a coach leaves the uncertainty and consternation will be less and less. Kind of like what happens at Bama now. Saban has proven that changes like this are not always a bad thing. It is about the program more than the specific coaches. If a coach isn’t getting it done, Dabo will fix it. This current situation and change can go a long way to solidifying that the overall program under Dabo is bigger than a coach or two.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Recall, that was the start of turning the corner on recruits


Jan 2, 2022, 2:58 PM

Bare

badge-donor-05yr.jpgmilitary_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 8:42 PM [ in reply to Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ... ]

Number 1 QB in 2022.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 7:43 PM

The sudden departure of coach V hurt this years recruiting class nothing more.

Dabo has done an heck of a job of recruiting the current star players on his roster and that's a big F'king deal!

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Perception, Perception, Perception


Jan 2, 2022, 2:55 PM

Clemson was hurt by the dismal season-long showing of the offense in most of the games this year... without the corrections expected from Coach Swinney. His refusal to speak honestly about the team's efficiency after the games caused many to lose their confidence in his ability to turn the team around this year and probably caused some recruits to wonder themselves about 2022.
Recruiting was bound to be hurt by the bad team performance AND the departure of Clemson's elite defensive coach. Both should be listed...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Agree


Dec 21, 2021, 8:05 PM

If we are trying to remain at the elite table, we need to compare this class with the Bamas, OSUs, and UGAs of the world, and by that standard, we are coming up woefully short.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

One year does not a recruiting fall off make…


Dec 21, 2021, 8:22 PM

Extenuating circumstances hurt recruiting this year. Those will not be the same next year. Watch and see.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Conversely,


Jan 2, 2022, 3:40 PM [ in reply to Agree ]

How did our NC years won classes compare to Bama and OSU’s?

The formula hasn’t changed, just the “fan” rhetoric.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Remain at the elite table?


Jan 2, 2022, 4:17 PM [ in reply to Agree ]

I’m sorry but we already left the elite table.

Our goal is to get back there.

To do that, we must maintain our strong defense and figure out a way to improve our offense considerably. That means much better line play, get some game changers at receiver, and find a quarterback that is elite. That means not just beating ACC teams that are way overmatched from a talent perspective, but also having the talent and coaching on par with elite teams such as Alabama.

If we are being honest with ourselves, we haven’t had that in several years.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Re: Remain at the elite table?


Jan 2, 2022, 4:45 PM

I guess out of respect for your stature on this board you haven’t been td’d and cooted todeath by this post. Kinda like MJ not getting called for fouls.
Your post is dead right on point.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Class of ‘71. Went through “rat season” and glad I did.


Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 8:29 PM

Dabo couldn't help he lost 3-4*'s and a 5* when Venables took the Oklahoma job.
That's a big setback that couldn't be helped.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 8:29 PM

Perhaps you should just go elsewhere and pull for a team!
Your pessimistic attitude is rather off putting!
Please go away!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Lawson 6'4 215 lbs


Dec 21, 2021, 9:40 PM

Campbell was 6'4 225 lbs

They are both RS their freshman year. Both need to get up to 255-260.

Other than the stars, what's the major difference? Both developmental. And maybe a positive, the 3 star local kid may be more likely to hang around and develop

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah ... and Myles Murphy was 6'5" / 260lbs and was


Dec 21, 2021, 11:03 PM

ready to go once he got on campus

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

How many other of our DE came in that ready?


Dec 22, 2021, 6:01 AM

Not Ferrell, or Beasley, or Adams, or Bryant, or off this years rotation Mascoll or Henry.

We've always targeted guys who need to fill out who are athletic, even on the inside. If you're going to compare everyone we recruit to a Murphy, Breese, Wilkins or Lawrence, well, most of the guys we have recruited fall well short of that.

Campbell is higher rated, and may indeed become a stud. But he's 2-3 years from playing, just like Lawson

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Lawson 6'4 215 lbs


Jan 2, 2022, 9:19 PM [ in reply to Lawson 6'4 215 lbs ]

I seem to remember an experiment with an athlete out of high school named Vic Beasley. Hoping one of these guys can turn into that.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 21, 2021, 11:43 PM

This could have likely been avoided if we sent more offers. I don't think we even sent out half the offers of Bama, UGA, and OSU.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Dec 22, 2021, 6:20 AM

We don't need Lawson for a couple of years at the earliest anyway. All we have to do is have a good class next year. It's not like we will be thin at DE. This class is small, but it isn't something to complain about under the circumstances. 2021 was a stacked class and those guys are still waiting their turns. This 2022 class had Good OL, good WR's, good QB, good db's, a good kicker. We missed at LB and DT and we are not done. Next years class will be a good one again. The team is really young and we really didn't have many needs. I think getting what we got was solid under the circumstances. It's small, but quality.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Jan 2, 2022, 9:11 PM

Oh there are allot of exceptions outside of Hunter over the years, but yes the general premise is correct.

The coaching turnover (BV) really hurt us.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I disagree with these guys ... here's why ...


Jan 2, 2022, 9:14 PM

I suggest you save yourself and go pull for a team you can support and not bad mouth. We’ll be fine here without you.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 26
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic