GIVE AN AWARD
Use your CatCoins™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus CatCoins™!


YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
I can't stress enough - the reason we outscored them 90-17
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 7  

I can't stress enough - the reason we outscored them 90-17

emoji_events [6]
Nov 26, 2017, 12:00 PM

over the past two years is simple: We called off the dogs.

If we had kept the foot on the gas: Maybe 118-3?

flag link

null


I thought you were going to say, because they suck.*****

[3]
Nov 26, 2017, 12:02 PM



flag link

Since when is that original?

[2]
Nov 26, 2017, 12:06 PM

My great grandmother knew that 100 years ago.

2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link

Re: I thought you were going to say, because they suck.*****

[1]
Nov 26, 2017, 12:06 PM

Both are legitimate answers!

Go Tigers!!!

2022 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link

Re: I can't stress enough - the reason we outscored them 90-17


Nov 26, 2017, 12:22 PM

All 17 points were AFTER the game was realistacally over......

flag link

Re: I can't stress enough - the reason we outscored them 90-17


Nov 26, 2017, 12:23 PM

All 17 points were AFTER the game was realistacally over......

flag link

Re: I can't stress enough - the reason we outscored them 90-17


Nov 26, 2017, 12:41 PM

Last year alone we could have scored somewhere in the 80's if we had tried. I don't think we punted once.

flag link

Only points they legitimately earned


Nov 26, 2017, 12:42 PM

Were the 3 points off a Kelley interception, and even that might be questionable. Their two TD's were both in garbage time against the 2nd and 3rd string defense.

2022 student level member flag link

Replies: 7  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: Season Tickets
FOR SALE: 2 in Sec UL asking 1100 each, email if intetested.

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
2384 people have read this post