|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1797]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1399
Joined: 11/12/11
|
Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday
Mar 5, 2014, 6:56 PM
|
|
I was just looking at the lineup of shows they have on the Longhorn Network. They have an "all-access" show that goes into the inner workings of recruiting, practices, the weight-room etc. After football games they air an "enhanced" version with in-game commentary from analysts, coaches, etc. And of course lots of famous games from the past. I don't pay for any premium channels now, but I would pay for a Clemson version of that.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday
Mar 5, 2014, 7:08 PM
|
|
we do it is called raycom, or sometimes swoffynet.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Heisman Winner [119698]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 54466
Joined: 6/24/09
|
You obviously was not a business major....
Mar 5, 2014, 8:41 PM
|
|
nen
|
|
|
|
|
|
Walk-On [145]
TigerPulse: 33%
Posts: 325
Joined: 10/5/08
|
Re: You obviously was not a business major....
Mar 5, 2014, 8:44 PM
|
|
You obviously weren't an English major.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2939]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3187
Joined: 5/10/05
|
Pruitt you beat me to it!***
Mar 5, 2014, 8:49 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2939]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3187
Joined: 5/10/05
|
I would love to see that also 78! It could happen!***
Mar 5, 2014, 8:50 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2281]
TigerPulse: 97%
Posts: 3489
Joined: 2/15/04
|
Re: Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday
Mar 5, 2014, 9:27 PM
|
|
A lot of the football coaches at Texas that loved the exposure of that network for recruiting earlier, began to HATE that network before the end of last year. They felt it showed too much of their practices and gave other teams a huge advantage in preparing for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amateur [43]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 261
Joined: 12/2/13
|
Re: Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday
Mar 5, 2014, 10:54 PM
|
|
Longhorn Network led to the departure of teams like aTm, the conference was not strong enough or ready enough at the time of the birth of that single school channel to have a conference program in place. Long story short, the LH Network has been an unmitigated disaster, by UT standards no less. And the friction it caused within their supposed conference was immense. When an ACC channel comes on board, it, like the B10 and SEC networks will have no place fora single school station ala the LH network. The reason is two fold. You either are part of your conference network or you are not, but there is no room for any school in a solid conference to go solo,and even if they did so, the benefits would be tremendously less than being part of a conference package. Anyone think a Clemson channel would trump being part of an ACC network station financially? Think again. Silly premise. And yes an ACC network is in the works. Were Clemson To go rogue and attempt their own network, they would need to be independent. What do you think an independent Clemson team would command monetarily for their own station outside of the ACC? Seriously, did the OP even think this out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [6768]
TigerPulse: 81%
Posts: 12494
Joined: 2/13/05
|
We have an ACC Network already.***
Mar 6, 2014, 1:24 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [158]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 729
Joined: 10/11/10
|
Re: Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday
Mar 6, 2014, 8:31 AM
[ in reply to Re: Hope we have a Clemson (TV) Network someday ] |
|
bottom line... Clemson has nothing to sell. Clemson has given all the rights to their teams (all tiers) to the ACC. you can start a Clemson Network that televises club sports and intramural games.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 9
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
