|
Replies: 32
| visibility 4,238
|
Orange Blooded [4659]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6063
Joined: 10/20/15
|
|
|
|
 |
Letterman [271]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 305
Joined: 12/6/98
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 6:31 AM
|
|
Better to look at it by the % of each ranking that were drafted. 23 - 5* rated players drafted is a very high % because there are so few.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1298
Joined: 1/4/04
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 6:43 AM
|
|
Yes exactly. Not sure if OP is trying to say stars don't matter or something like that but you have to look at it on a % basis. 20+ 5-stars is staggering! It means that stars very much do predict talent, within reason, relatively accurately!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [40929]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42949
Joined: 11/30/98
|
I believe he is pointing out how good the correlation is
May 2, 2017, 6:57 AM
|
|
A high percentage of the 5 stars and a good percentage of the 4 stars got drafted
23/34 5 stars or 68%
76/297 4 stars or 26%
90/1543 3 stars or 6% 3 stars
2 stars and under way less than 6%
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5436]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 11913
Joined: 9/23/01
|
Re: I believe he is pointing out how good the correlation is
May 2, 2017, 1:51 PM
|
|
But but the coots are looking at just the 3s
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23112]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 19812
Joined: 1/22/03
|
There's only 35 stars at most each year(25 so far this year)
May 2, 2017, 9:40 AM
[ in reply to Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings... ] |
|
and over 1,500 3 stars, do the math and check the percentages, then adjust your agenda. I'll stick to the stars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30827]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34494
Joined: 6/22/03
|
So it doesn't matter what school you go to
May 2, 2017, 7:46 AM
|
|
Once 247 gives u 5 stars your are nfl bound
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 8:01 AM
|
|
You are aware that there are a whole lot more 3 star and below players than 4 star and 5 star right?
From a pure % stand point 5 stars and 4 stars are much more likely to make it to the league.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30827]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34494
Joined: 6/22/03
|
And are you aware there are 5 kinds of bananas?***
May 2, 2017, 8:02 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: And are you aware there are 5 kinds of bananas?***
May 2, 2017, 8:10 AM
|
|
"Bananas are the most popular fruit in the world. The banana is, in fact, not a tree but a high herb that grows up to 15 metres. It is believed that there are almost 1000 varieties of bananas in the world, subdivided in 50 groups. The most commonly known banana is the Cavendish variety, which is the one produced for export markets."
http://www.bananalink.org.uk/all-about-bananas
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1345]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1399
Joined: 5/28/06
|
Re: And are you aware there are 5 kinds of bananas?***
May 2, 2017, 8:21 AM
|
|
Unfortunately you are incorrect and score a 20%. You obviously haven't studied this subject. My favorite is the round banana with the orange crust. Roll Tide!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24767]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42487
Joined: 7/31/10
|
You get your A+...***
May 2, 2017, 8:57 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3405]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5216
Joined: 1/26/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60229]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42557
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7723]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5929
Joined: 12/14/15
|
So our obsession with stars is confirmed, thanks.***
May 2, 2017, 8:14 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2011]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1297
Joined: 4/17/17
|
Re: So our obsession with stars is confirmed, thanks.***
May 2, 2017, 8:19 AM
|
|
Precisely
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16506]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11655
Joined: 9/1/01
|
Would be interesting to see the star rating of 1st rounders***
May 2, 2017, 8:52 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [13038]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22360
Joined: 4/24/04
|
I think 10 or 11 were 5 star guys... it was nearly 1/3.
May 2, 2017, 9:15 AM
|
|
Less than 1% of recruits earn a 5* rating so making up ~30% of the 1st round is pretty incredible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:10 AM
|
|
I will take a 4 or 5 star player over a 2 or 3 star player any day. Recruiting rankings closely match the top 25 rankings. True talent shows on the court or field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:15 AM
|
|
dumb dirt ######
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:23 AM
|
|
Watson was a 5 star player. Tee Higgins is a 5 star player. Spiller was a 5 star player. If you want to see what a team with 2 and 3 star players look like, go to Duke or Wake Forest. Pretty pathetic! We have a great recruiting staff and I'm very glad they go get the best players.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:24 AM
|
|
Once again you are not fooling anyone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:32 AM
|
|
You aren't either. I dont know why this subject is so divisive. Super talent plus good coaching wins a lot of games. Ask Saban or Dabo. Are some of you trying to say that 2 and 3 star players are better than 4 and 5 star recruits? That's just plain wrong. Don't go by the NFL scouts. They drafted division 2 players. Chicago drafted a joke at qb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 9:55 AM
|
|
Good lord you really are an idiot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 10:04 AM
|
|
On what? We recruit well every year so this is pointless. Are some of you fans wanting us to take 2 and 3 star players? Bowden did that with linemen. Let's hope we land Salyer,Hill,and Jackson on the line. Add Ross and Eagles at wr. Add Jeffries and Henry on defense. The third national title would be Clemsons soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: For those obsessed with 247 star rankings...
May 2, 2017, 10:05 AM
|
|
You are a pathetic little troll.
No one is saying the BS you are spewing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4378]
TigerPulse: 96%
Posts: 4849
Joined: 5/22/15
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1322]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 2115
Joined: 12/25/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: Watson was a 4 star***
May 2, 2017, 1:57 PM
|
|
My bad!
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [29036]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36097
Joined: 8/28/00
|
Not sure what point you are trying to make
May 2, 2017, 9:59 AM
|
|
As has been mentioned the interesting numbers would be percentages of each group who were drafted.
But additionally, something that is often missed in these discussions is that players are "evaluated" and given stars based on their potential COLLEGE impact which is not at all the same metric as any potential NFL impact. A superstar high school QB who can run like the wind and make folks miss and can thrown decently, may get a 4 or 5 star grade based on the college game being fluid enough to tailor gameplans to that skillset, but the NFL will draft them as an Athlete at best and perhaps not even then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [648]
TigerPulse: 49%
Posts: 2764
Joined: 3/6/17
|
Re: Not sure what point you are trying to make
May 2, 2017, 10:54 AM
|
|
On that we all agreed. College coaches recruit the best players to fit their system. Watson was a 4 star spread qb who was a Heisman finalist twice. Mitch Trubisky isn't in Watsons league. Chicago wanted a drop
Back qb not a spread qb. They were system specific. Watson was much higher rated in high school but the pros did not value him as much. Go Texans!
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [7718]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 7444
Joined: 1/10/16
|
Re: Not sure what point you are trying to make
May 2, 2017, 1:33 PM
|
|
"Watson was a 4 star"
I thought he was a 5 star above....
Stupid dirt ######...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2533]
TigerPulse: 89%
Posts: 4161
Joined: 10/10/08
|
U know, actually, this makes much sense
May 2, 2017, 12:12 PM
|
|
A young man just isn't fully developed coming out of HS, and his best most athletic years are way ahhead of him still. This has shown up over and over, starting with Michael Jordan, recently, to present. We simply can't tell what an 18 y.o. will be in three to seven years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 32
| visibility 4,238
|
|
|
50
