Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
search
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!
W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000
YOUR BALANCE
Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 8
| visibility 1,080

Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:13 AM

And based on the rule it was illegal . You can clearly see it came directly off the tee. They got it wrong tonight. And it hurt us badly, changed the game.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:19 AM

Yes sir...Felix2 is correct. We got screwed. Should have been a dead ball at the spot the Alabama player touched it and belong to Clemson.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:20 AM

For reference NCAA rulebook article 6 section A.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:22 AM
FullSizeRender.jpg(102.3 K)

Does NOT have to touch the ground. The USC game incident involved a fair catch. We did not call for a fair catch against Bama, because we had no one anywhere near the ball.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

maybe so... but the ruling in the coot game WAS NOT


Jan 12, 2016, 1:24 AM

for a fair catch

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"I've been working since I was 15 continually until now. I worked 40 hours a week at 15, when it wasn't even legal for 15 year olds to work that many hours."


Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:25 AM [ in reply to Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground ]

I see what you are saying but the article in the rulebook reads otherwise. Fair catch or not.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:28 AM

If you think about it, who knows what would have happened even if we did get the ball on that play. Kinda like people assumed UNC was going to score if they didn't get called for offside. We blew it on 3rd down. Missed a kick. Got three when we needed 7 and missed a boat load of assignments and tackles. If we do those things right, then the onside kick becomes irrelevant.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:29 AM

the officials in the coot game called it right, but explained it wrong. the alabama kick tonight was legal...however, had one of our players thought to call for a fair catch, before the alabama player caught the ball in the air, without it first touching, the ground, it would have been a penalty and we would have gotten possession of the ball at the spot of the foul

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Felix2 is correct.... The onside kick did not hit the ground


Jan 12, 2016, 1:47 AM

Cdfrisch..you keep beating that drum but what is your reference? Article 6 says opportunity to receive the kick. I can't find where it talks about a fair catch. Just trying to figure out where you are getting your info.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 8
| visibility 1,080
📰 E-Mail News Alerts

TigerBoard POTD

Hill Watch...139 days!!!

by O.J.

Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic