Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 1

FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 9:32 AM

McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR

Read Update »


flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 10:33 AM

ONCE AGAIN ... I have to wonder exactly what the standard is for their grades ... DeAndre Hopkins? An average professional receiver? A Top College receiver?

To me, giving Mike a C+ for Big Play Ability tells me that, once again, they haven't done their homework. McShay described Mike's fantastic "Big Time" catches in the last 6 minutes of the Natty yet gives him a C+??? How about the diving catch of Watson's bomb at the 5 yard line, or carrying one usc player on his back and beating 3 others to plow into the end zone?

Game after game if there was one receiver that I counted on to make big plays CONSISTENTLY, it was Mike Williams. Big Play Ability for Mike Williams? A+ IMO.

It seems to me that both Deshaun and Mike are affected by the "Clemson Curve", in that our athletes seem to be held to a higher standard than other players. In the end, it doesn't matter because OUR Tigers ALWAYS step up their game and class and rise to the top.

I have to wonder though, how would the ratings look if he were an Alabama, Ohio State, or Michigan player?

I'm proud of ALL of our players for the way they represent themselves and Clemson University. GO TIGERS!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 3:30 PM

McShay is a dolt!!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 5:50 PM [ in reply to Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR ]

"I have to wonder though, how would the ratings look if he were an Alabama, Ohio State, or Michigan player?"

I don't think the ratings would be any different.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 9:34 AM

Big play ability C+???? Yeah ok McShay...

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

McSham... Expect his revised eval in a few weeks... No


Apr 3, 2017, 11:09 AM

different than the way he did DW4... He's a frickin' joke.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Absolutely! He is a waste of time. He speaks with an


Apr 3, 2017, 5:37 PM

arrogant condescending tone, but the narrative changes almost every time he opens his mouth about a player. So, if he makes 30 points over time that are a "plus" or a "minus" for a player, he can later repackage them together to support wherever the player is selected.

He is a putz.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Will he be joining Sammy in Buf?


Apr 3, 2017, 1:46 PM

Great career he had here at Clem, wish Williams nothing but the best....up next,Deon Cain

#21

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 1:50 PM

McShay must hate Clemson.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 4:12 PM

Mike Williams is a taller Nuk imo.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Big Play Ability...C+.....won....has this moron (sorry for


Apr 27, 2021, 1:15 PM

the misspelling) ever actually watched him play....especially in big games when we needed a big play!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

C+ lmfao***


Apr 3, 2017, 5:44 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Tired of hearing this blow hole pontificate ...


Apr 3, 2017, 6:25 PM

... until he (and others) find a way to factor being a "winner" ito their assessment, I will continue to just way and see who can make it big in the NFL and who cannot.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: FB Update: McShay: Williams not a burner, but still big-play WR


Apr 3, 2017, 8:08 PM

Williams is a mismatch for ANY pro corner. He's too big for a 6' guy to cover. If you're QB is worth a #### Mike will get 100 per game and bail you out for first downs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 13
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic