»
Topic: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17
Replies: 37   Last Post: Aug 29, 2013, 10:31 PM by: Coward Robert Ford
This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.


GIVE AN AWARD
Use your CatCoins™ to grant this post a special award and grant the author bonus CatCoins™!

Love Love Love!
monetization_on 1000
Quality Content
monetization_on 1000
Big Fish
monetization_on 1000
Hmm
monetization_on 1000
Flammable
monetization_on 1000
Caring
monetization_on 1000
Nom Nom Nom
monetization_on 1000
Ooo, Shiny!
monetization_on 1000
Hear ye, hear ye
monetization_on 1000
Cheers
monetization_on 1000
Bravo
monetization_on 500
Grats
monetization_on 1000
Take My Coins
monetization_on 1000
Great Idea!
monetization_on 1000
Nope
monetization_on 1000

YOUR BALANCE
monetization_on
[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
Replies: 37  

Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 9:17 PM

That isn't good news, in my opinion. UNC does have some big mistakes in the game though.

It is odd that UNC's up tempo offense is having a noticeable effect on SC but I didn't notice SC having much of a problem with Clemson's up tempo, even before half time, as in this game.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17

[2]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:21 PM

what you are leaving out is that USC Defense lost Swearinger, Holloman, quarles, and a couple other contributors to their defense. this defense just has hampton and clowney. and the UNC offense is terrible. that's not an uptempo offense they are running.. its a hurry up.. Clemson would have already ran 70 plays the way that offense was running. and a lot of running down field with those linebackers and corners.. that defense would be shot..

military_donation.jpg flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 9:24 PM

Ah, thanks man. I watch college football but I don't really understand the game, so to speak.

What exactly is the difference between hurry up and up tempo? I apologize if this is a dumb question.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 10:23 PM

There's no diff CRF. It's just that we're better at running it.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 10:31 PM

Ah, so just a more consistent excetition which obviously would tire out the defensive players more.

I don't think I ever seen defensive players so tired as those LSU players in that bowl game last year. I swear two of them look like they were in tears and that was before they lost the game.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 9:26 PM

Is Clowney tired simply because the UNC offense is able to dial in on him more than last year, given the SC defense is less talented?

I must admit the Clowney stomach virus thing sounds like a tall tale. LOL

What is funny is I just read something today about how he is in great shape this year compared to last year.

flag link

I'm not cocky, but UNC can't hold our jock

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:24 PM

this year at least. We outclass them in every conceivable way. It's to be expected, they are rebuilding and recovering from a number of things, including sanctions. They're just in a different point in the cycle than we are.

flag link

Re: I'm not cocky, but UNC can't hold our jock

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:28 PM

They look like they have some talent but the play calling isn't the best.

UNC is being investigated for all sorts of things these days.

flag link

Talent? Their talent is terrible.***


Aug 29, 2013, 9:42 PM



flag link

Re: Talent? Their talent is terrible.***


Aug 29, 2013, 9:49 PM

Well I think their QB looks solid, one of their RB's had some good runs, and that Hurst guy was doing good against Clowney. That sounds like some talent to me.

I already said I'm not a football expert though.

flag link

Renner had terrible throws


Aug 29, 2013, 10:00 PM

Many overthrown. I agree with the rest, but their RB is not Gio Bernard.

flag link

Clemson


Re: Renner had terrible throws


Aug 29, 2013, 10:11 PM

That's true, I actually forgot that guy graduated, I was looking forward to the game when I thought he was playing but I knew they didn't have much of a chance when I found out.

flag link

^^^^Coot with new name^^^^***

[3]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:26 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: ^^^^Coot with new name^^^^***


Aug 29, 2013, 9:31 PM

I get the feeling you say post this every single time a new person shows up on here.

flag link

No that was actually the first. You got a wrong feeling***

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:33 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Statistics show a handle made on the same day,

emoji_events [6]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:37 PM

first post is a thin veiled attack on Clemson, yes, you are definitely a #### loving piece of ####.

2021 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2011_pickem_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-soccerkrzy.jpg flag link

Cole @ Beach Cole w/ Clemson Hat


Kinda rough but +1......LOL***

[2]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:40 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: Statistics show a handle made on the same day,


Aug 29, 2013, 9:47 PM

LOL,

All I did was say I don't think it is somewhat surprising SC is up 17 with Clowney looking like he is about to die. Mike James looks a lot better than I thought he was but that might be more UNC was horrible on that play than anything.

Our offense got LSU tired in that game but not SC but they did have a lot of freak 3rd and long conversions in that game to eat up so much time in the 2nd half.

flag link

The name, joined date, & how SC handled us was giveaway***

[2]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:50 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: The name, joined date, & how SC handled us was giveaway***


Aug 29, 2013, 9:53 PM

You are paranoid.

My screenname is based on the book about Jesse James, which I liked, and I just read.

I signed up tonight b/c the football season started tonight.

Go to this website citydata.com/forum and go down to the SOuth Carolina forum, then Columbia forum, and look at some of the threads about USC. I am the Clemson fan on there. Let's just say the coots didn't like me very much. LOL

flag link

I know who Robert Ford was. The fact that you are bringing

[2]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:58 PM

up a book on a sports based website is cause enough that your shoelaces should be tied together.

flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: I know who Robert Ford was. The fact that you are bringing


Aug 29, 2013, 10:02 PM

Most people read books. You seem kind of rigid man. Just go post on another thread , I don't want to argue or be interrogated. I said I am not a SC fan. You don't want to believe that, that is fine. Are SC fans not allowed on here? I don't see what the big deal is, either way. I don't get angry about sports, it is supposed to be fun.

flag link

I was here first. Lol!!!!!***


Aug 29, 2013, 10:03 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: The name, joined date, & how SC handled us was giveaway***


Aug 29, 2013, 10:03 PM

I'm a frequenter of City-Data myself, though I'm usually on the city-vs-city area haha. I don't really have any connection to South Carolina outside of having gone to Clemson so I don't really pay attention to the South Carolina sub-forums

flag link

Dude.

[3]
Aug 29, 2013, 10:10 PM

In numerous posts, you state how 'little you know about football'.

Then you proceed to break down esoteric minutiae of Clemson/SCar's previous seasons/rosters.

Also, after being labeled a 'coot', you react with a studied defensiveness, as opposed to the bewilderment/confusion that would've accompanied such a charge were you who you said you are.

Coward, indeed.

Congrats on the big win. Expect a solid 5-7 more this season.

flag link

Re: Dude.


Aug 29, 2013, 10:13 PM

why shouldn't I be defensive, he clearly is on offense, basically trying to lynch mob me and get me banned I think.

I don't think my analysis is much more than a casual football fan's, I can talk about schedules and stuff like that, I haven't had any detailed football analysis on here though.

flag link

R u kidding me

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 9:55 PM

They played NC....they will get their butts drug all over the field this year.

flag link

Re: R u kidding me


Aug 29, 2013, 10:03 PM

LOL,

OK man, I didn't watch that much of the game. When I was watching is when they got down the near the end zone and they had some good plays in that series.

I'm def. not a UNC fan and in fact, I hate UNC, overhyped school and it is leftwing too.

flag link

lol good try coot

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 10:01 PM

UNC has the worst defense in the ACC as they did last year. Your whole defense was gassed by halftime. UGA is licking their chops for next week.

military_donation.jpg flag link

^^^^SEE??^^^^***


Aug 29, 2013, 10:02 PM



flag link

NO FARMERS NO FOOD


Re: lol good try coot


Aug 29, 2013, 10:05 PM

Dude,

I said they were gassed. One of my points was I was surprised Clemson didn't wear them out last year because Clemson has more talent on offense, and Clemson was able to wear out LSU. I don't see how this is a coot ruse, but even if it was, it still is a decent observation.

flag link

Coots had much better defense last year

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 10:07 PM

and lost a lot on defense. They don't have much depth this year and it is showing and Clowney obviously didn't get into shape. Think he may have eye in the NFL?

military_donation.jpg flag link

Re: Coots had much better defense last year


Aug 29, 2013, 10:10 PM

It is kind of odd he can't get into shape, I thought these guys basically in football camp all year?

I could see him being a bust in NFL when he is going up against stud offense players across an entire team.

flag link

Re: lol good try coot


Aug 29, 2013, 10:24 PM

I'd say Georgia is licking their chops for Saturday night, if I know Mark Richt!

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17

[1]
Aug 29, 2013, 10:03 PM

Well they didn't have a problem with our up-tempo LAST season but this is a new season and it seems that the coaching staff was more concerned about packing the pounds on the USuC defense than having them show up in good condition. They've been sucking wind all game.

And we have yet to play our game yet, but from what I have seen so far - the coots D would have a heck of a time trying to stop our Offense. Clemson Offense > UNC Offense

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 10:07 PM

Well that's true, I do think Clemson offense could carve up this SC defense, although this assumes it is as good as last year which we don't know for sure losing Andre Ellington and Hopkins.

But I do think UNC has done much better blocking Clowney than Clemson did and it was really Clowney who killed us. I think he gets into Boyd's head a bit too, if Boyd just stops thinking so much out there we should be fine this year.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 10:19 PM

Clowney will struggle in nfl. He has no work ethic. He plays for his benefit and not his team.

flag link

Re: Even without Clowney doing anything, SC is up 17


Aug 29, 2013, 10:24 PM

Was Clowney the SC player who completely wiffed on a tackle on the QB? That was pretty funny, not sure if I have seen that before.

flag link

Replies: 37  

TIGER TICKETS

FB GAME: ACC Championship
FOR SALE: Eight (8) tickets in Section 517, Row 21. Will sell all or any for $45/ticket OBO...text or call 704...

Buy or Sell CU Tickets and More in Tiger Tickets!

[ Archives - Tiger Boards Archive ]
Start New Topic
2239 people have read this post