Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
is Louisville only good this year bc
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 13
| visibility 1,473

is Louisville only good this year bc


Oct 27, 2016, 3:20 PM

of that pistol spread offense they run hasn't been seen? Kinda like our offense seemed unstoppable last year and this year every team has watched and study our offense?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: is Louisville only good this year bc


Oct 27, 2016, 3:24 PM

Our offense has had the same structure since Year 1 Chad Morris. Obviously we keep adding new wrinkles but I don't think our offense last year was so different that nobody had film or time to study it.

Louisville is good because they have the raw speed to gain the edge or to win a footrace. They also have the physicality in the trenches to allow for that speed to take them from good to top 10.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program***


Oct 27, 2016, 3:32 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Re: No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program***


Oct 27, 2016, 3:33 PM

This too.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Dont kid yourself


Oct 27, 2016, 3:34 PM [ in reply to No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program*** ]

Take Jackson off that squad and what have you got? Just another middle of the pack ACC team.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dont kid yourself


Oct 27, 2016, 3:36 PM

They haven't been middle of the pack since they joined the ACC...they're easily the 3rd or 4th best team for the past few years (sliding into 2nd best this year).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dont kid yourself


Oct 27, 2016, 3:38 PM

Like I said, take Jackson off and what have you got this year? Wouldnt be second I would wager. 3rd or 4th puts you in a log jam of middle of the pack teams.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Dont kid yourself


Oct 27, 2016, 3:44 PM

Initially I was thinking you're right about them not being second this year, but I can't help but watch how helpless FSU was all over the field against them. Maybe it was just a snowball effect, but I think they win that game with or without Jackson.

Now, if you think 3/4 is a "logjam" then that's cool. I'd say there have been three tiers in the ACC recently:

- Us and FSU
- UNC, UL, and barely hanging on with VT and Miami
- Everyone else.

I think the argument could be made that UL has joined us and FSU in tier 1 in a similar position to VT and Miami in tier 2. Time will tell whether they stay on that edge, cement themselves as a top program, or fall back down.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Petrino builds teams, not programs


Oct 27, 2016, 3:42 PM [ in reply to No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program*** ]

look at what happens when he leaves. They fall off the face of the earth and have to take years to get back where they were. Petrino leaves an undisciplined mess that someone else has to clean up.


He's great at building teams (especially offensive).

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Exactly!***


Oct 27, 2016, 3:49 PM



badge-donor-15yr.jpg2012_pickem_champ.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Petrino builds teams, not programs


Oct 27, 2016, 5:29 PM [ in reply to Petrino builds teams, not programs ]

I can't think of many programs that don't take a step back when the coach that carried them during their ascendancy leaves.

After a few years Oregon has bitten the dust. Stanford is softening.

Anyway, I'm fine stating that Petrino knows how to assimilate the jucos, transfers, etc. and gets them to play as a team...and that he doesn't build a program.

I wouldn't hire him but he knows what he is doing.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


^^^This. Gave us a hell of a game last year.


Oct 27, 2016, 3:47 PM [ in reply to No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program*** ]

Petrino will keep making the team better, especially offensively. They will be rivals until petrino leaves again. I personally think he would be a good fit at lsu and would make a lot of bank. But frankly his road to nc is a lot closer where he's at right now. We won the game and not taking anything away from it, proud of our boys. But a couple of things go differently and they win and are nc contenders. But I would like to point out to be the best you have to beat the best and Louisville you just didn't get it done in dv.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

With thug cast-offs, Jucos, and other trash******


Oct 27, 2016, 5:08 PM [ in reply to No. They are good because Petrino knows how to build a program*** ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

WOOP!***


Oct 27, 2016, 5:10 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpgringofhonor-clemsontiger1988-110.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 13
| visibility 1,473
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic