|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
Addict [449]
TigerPulse: 44%
Posts: 1074
Joined: 7/25/12
|
Coots losing Bruce = us losing Bryant when he declares after
Jan 3, 2014, 2:56 PM
|
|
the bowl game.
|
|
|
|
 |
Orange Blooded [2394]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 5533
Joined: 11/16/06
|
Byrant needs another year. He will probably go, though.
Jan 3, 2014, 2:58 PM
|
|
Like Sammy, I just don't think he wants to go through a year of a new QB if a third round or higher pick is possible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21077]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13552
Joined: 9/15/05
|
Bruce Ellington was much more a factor of their success
Jan 3, 2014, 3:16 PM
|
|
than Bryant has been for us.
Them losing Ellington is bigger than us losing Bryant. We have tons of talent at WR alreaddy here and coming very soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2537]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3389
Joined: 8/5/13
|
Re: Bruce Ellington was much more a factor of their success
Jan 3, 2014, 3:20 PM
|
|
we'll still miss him... but apparently his ME in team is a little large...
I can understand if he's in need of money to support his chilluns. but still think it'd be a mistake in the long run.
he should develop more, imo
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2638]
TigerPulse: 58%
Posts: 2707
Joined: 5/28/02
|
Bruce Ellington is by far a bigger loss to the chickens...
Jan 3, 2014, 3:18 PM
|
|
Bryant is not close to producing for us like BE did for SC. BE is as big a loss as losing Shaw. The guy was a player. Bryant has the potential to be a playmaker like Bruce, but he needs to be more consistent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aficionado [152]
TigerPulse: 91%
Posts: 447
Joined: 12/1/98
|
Agreed.
Jan 3, 2014, 3:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [333]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 916
Joined: 4/21/05
|
Is this a joke?
Jan 3, 2014, 3:19 PM
|
|
Bruce was 1/3 of their offense, with Shaw and Davis.
He leaves a big void. Bryant is/was just a piece to the puzzle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [70]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 368
Joined: 9/21/12
|
Re: Is this a joke?
Jan 3, 2014, 3:49 PM
|
|
I don't think he was a 1/3, Shaw and Davis were much more important. He was our top WR though in a fairly balanced receiving corps, but more importantly he was the go to guy in big situations and he came through a lot for us.
I was surprised to see that Bryant had better stats though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Standout [333]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 916
Joined: 4/21/05
|
Re: Is this a joke?
Jan 3, 2014, 4:04 PM
|
|
okay, fine. 3/10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5977]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6620
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Really? Your last two wins Davis had like 15 yards on 20
Jan 3, 2014, 4:13 PM
[ in reply to Re: Is this a joke? ] |
|
carries............ He tore up Kentucky, Vandy, and the like but didn't do much against the good Defenses..........
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recruit [91]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 195
Joined: 1/12/11
|
Re: Coots losing Bruce = us losing Bryant when he declares after
Jan 3, 2014, 3:39 PM
|
|
We've got way more talent behind Bryant than they have behind Ellington. I'm glad to see Shaw go for sure
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10402]
TigerPulse: 95%
Posts: 17413
Joined: 8/9/10
|
But we will CP
Jan 3, 2014, 3:52 PM
|
|
Back and ready to shine
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [24208]
TigerPulse: 94%
Posts: 16428
Joined: 8/6/02
|
Tell 'em coot
Jan 3, 2014, 3:57 PM
|
|
smh
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [28802]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 58393
Joined: 11/14/03
|
Did anybody bother checking stats before declaring Ellington's superiority?
Jan 3, 2014, 4:01 PM
|
|
Because, if you had, you'd see that Bryant had more receiving yards than Ellington despite having played in one less game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 13
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
