|
Replies: 146
| visibility 1
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 10:27 AM
|
|
Them likely being matched up with Iowa in the outback bowl (for like the 12th time in the last 13 years).
At least Michigan (who's historically a good team) made last year's win look relevant. This year? Nothing. Enjoy coots. Once again almost feel sorry for the poor baztards.
|
|
|
|
 |
All-In [30764]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34460
Joined: 6/22/03
|
it is a Legitimate gripe,
Dec 5, 2013, 10:29 AM
|
|
But most sec fans are unwilling to fix it, so fork em.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [400]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 1255
Joined: 11/3/06
|
Re: it is a Legitimate gripe,
Dec 5, 2013, 11:50 AM
|
|
It's fixed. The flawed BCS era is over after this year. It failed to do it's intended purpose. It was supposed to pit the top 10 teams against each other in a set of premier bowls. The automatic qualifier and conference limit rules made it impossible to do that because only 2 of the SEC's normal 5 top 10 teams could get one while teams outside the top 10 got in by default. If the original purpose of the BCS had been carried out, Carolina would have been in the last 3 and Clemson wouldn't have been in any.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zealot [868]
TigerPulse: 50%
Posts: 1261
Joined: 1/29/10
|
Re: it is a Legitimate gripe,
Dec 5, 2013, 1:55 PM
|
|
Wrong. The purpose of the BCS was to put the 2 most deserving teams in the national championship game. It has pretty much failed to do that as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
yep, their knickers are def in a twist over this***
Dec 5, 2013, 10:29 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [67659]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 115405
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 10:30 AM
|
|
I see their point but it isnt exactly like we control making this happen. Sometimes things work for you bowl wise and sometimes they dont.
The fact they wouldnt do so well this year bowl wise would not bother me at all if it happens that way
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [1051]
TigerPulse: 31%
Posts: 3302
Joined: 6/10/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 10:34 AM
|
|
I am not sure I agree that the orange is the best bcs bowl. the rose and sugar may want to disagree.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
how many times have we been screwed bowl-wise
Dec 5, 2013, 10:36 AM
[ in reply to Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and ] |
|
Music City, Russell Athletic, etc.
SEVERAL times.
ACC bowls are so crappy that we HAVE to be in the top 2 to go anything decent since the ACC lost the Gator Bowl (thanks Swoffie). At least the SEC has about 5 or 6 good destinations. Too bad for them that the Chickens go to the same one every year (Tampa) and basically play the same team (a clod-footed 3-loss Big 10 team).
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15501]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21400
Joined: 9/24/07
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [53143]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21802
Joined: 11/16/05
|
I'd still prefer they go to Shreveport every year!
Dec 5, 2013, 10:32 AM
|
|
GO IOWA!!!!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [15501]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 21400
Joined: 9/24/07
|
Re: I'd still prefer they go to Shreveport every year!
Dec 5, 2013, 11:04 AM
|
|
I'd prefer they stayed in cootlumbia where they belong.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 10:33 AM
|
|
We're no more jealous of the ACC runner up benefitting from NCAA welfare than I am of the guys at the soup kitchen getting a hot meal while I eat my cold sub sandwich that I earned! Why do you think the BCS is being done away with? They are tired of having to take the Clemsons and Northern Illinois's of the world when there are better teams available! Enjoy it, because it's the last year that your irrelevant conference gives you any advantage...
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11478]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9412
Joined: 10/3/12
|
^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered
Dec 5, 2013, 10:35 AM
|
|
Why are you cootmad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered
Dec 5, 2013, 10:37 AM
|
|
I'm not mad, just giving facts.... I promise you I am getting much joy out of you guys grasping at straws to get some sort of moral victory here. Any BCS game besides the championship is irrelevant due to the ridiculous conference requirements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2481
Joined: 9/1/06
|
yeah, he mad***
Dec 5, 2013, 11:09 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11478]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9412
Joined: 10/3/12
|
How relevant is the outback bowl?
Dec 5, 2013, 12:28 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered ] |
|
Congrats on being 5th place again. Don't buy rings this time or another one of your players will lie to police about it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: How relevant is the outback bowl?
Dec 5, 2013, 12:58 PM
|
|
so what does that say about your pathetic conference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: How relevant is the outback bowl?
Dec 5, 2013, 1:46 PM
[ in reply to How relevant is the outback bowl? ] |
|
And the outback selects two spots higher than the ACC's first non-BCS game. You do realize that chic fil-a gets the 5th... I love that word... 5th SEC spot to ACC 2nd. So last years win over LSU is that much more special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered
Dec 5, 2013, 10:42 AM
[ in reply to ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered ] |
|
Tell me, what will you being saying if Clemson goes to the OB again and puts up a performance again like last OB? Is it worth it?
I am not either a Clemson or SC fan. I find it funny that Clemson fans really think they are relevant outside the ACC and state of SC in football. Arkansas used to be relevant but they are not longer and will not until the consistantly win their league. There are only a few teams that are of national relevance and Clemson, SC and Arkansas(my team) are not in that picture.
To be honest this is what makes college football the greatest sport because of the passion that goes along with every school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
What you and your pigs are not in, is any national
Dec 5, 2013, 10:44 AM
|
|
conversation, at all.
Awful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: What you and your pigs are not in, is any national
Dec 5, 2013, 10:48 AM
|
|
I never said we where. I am just saying watch out what you wish for before blasting a team that has owned you for the past 5 years.
Lets give a little time to a coach who came into a difficult situation and is revamping a entire team. Petrino did not do Arkansas any favors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Last I checked, this is Tigernet. Not Cawknet. Not Hawgnet.
Dec 5, 2013, 10:54 AM
|
|
There are many that think that we simply shat the bed, Saturday. Dominated? Hardly. Also, this is a program that we have owned, for, well...since the beginning of the series. Is this our forebearers' cawks? No, they are not. Is anyone proclaiming that they are? Not many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: Last I checked, this is Tigernet. Not Cawknet. Not Hawgnet.
Dec 5, 2013, 11:03 AM
|
|
Ok, lets just say that we can agree that we disagree.
Just answer this one thing, do you believe Clemson would benefit more being in the SEC or even the Big XII than the ACC?
My answer is yes only because of the reputation of the ACC right now, they may change a little with a FSU win but honestly does a FSU vs Duke matchup help or hurt the outlook of the ACC? Just want a honest opinion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
does being in the SEC hurt your basketball program?
Dec 5, 2013, 11:12 AM
|
|
SEC basketball is pretty comparable to ACC football.
Does being in the SEC hurt Arkansas' basketball reputation?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: does being in the SEC hurt your basketball program?
Dec 5, 2013, 12:12 PM
|
|
I do not believe so. If they start to produce, which it looks like Mike Anderson is turning the program around, then all will take care of it.
Has it hurt Florida during their run in basketball?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1838]
TigerPulse: 59%
Posts: 6249
Joined: 12/17/06
|
Kentucky***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:18 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: Kentucky***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:20 PM
|
|
I will say one thing for sure and that is the NCAA tourny has it right, conference ties "usually" do not matter and they do a better job at looking at the entire body of work of a team. We have seen many teams with better winning records not let in for teams that have better quality wins.
Just with the playoffs for football will be a start of something better. Still think a 4 team playoff is going to have issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
I agree. 8 teams will sort it out.***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:07 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Absolutely!
Dec 5, 2013, 11:16 AM
[ in reply to Re: Last I checked, this is Tigernet. Not Cawknet. Not Hawgnet. ] |
|
I don't think you're gonna find much debate here concerning the ACC and the perception, which is reality.
If UNC and Miami, along with VT can ever recover, I think the Coastal and East will be very comparable.
The additions of a decent Louisville and, what once was pretty good programs in Pitt and Syracuse, The ACC doesn't appear to be as gawd awful. Will VT remain an enigma?
Clemson is missing some ingredients that will be required to match FSU, in the Atlantic.
As was mentioned in another thread here, you'll see the playoff selection dismantle the SEC myth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addict [441]
TigerPulse: 34%
Posts: 1346
Joined: 1/2/13
|
Why will it dispell the myth?
Dec 5, 2013, 11:33 AM
|
|
Just curious, haven't really heard that take. If the playoff were this year, wouldn't the SEC have 2 teams in?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
I don't buy the whole SEC dominating thing.
Dec 5, 2013, 11:56 AM
|
|
Sure, representing teams have dominated the MNC but, for the past twenty years, it's been 2, at best 3 teams carrying the water.
E$PN has perpetuated the whole trademark. Even lowly Clemson has been known to bust a Tennessee or LSU in the mouth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: I don't buy the whole SEC dominating thing.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:09 PM
|
|
There has been 1 dominating team in the SEC. (Alabama)
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
It wasn't that long ago that UF and LSU won MNC.***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:30 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: It wasn't that long ago that UF and LSU won MNC.***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:34 PM
|
|
Do not forget about Auburn and if things work out right they could have another chance this year.....
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: It wasn't that long ago that UF and LSU won MNC.***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:37 PM
|
|
Agreed.
LSU has been a top 10 (at least) program for a while now. And Auburn has had some very good seasons too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: I don't buy the whole SEC dominating thing.
Dec 5, 2013, 1:39 PM
[ in reply to I don't buy the whole SEC dominating thing. ] |
|
Listen...I get sick of the SEC but that is a dumb statement to say that just 2-3 teams have been carrying the SEC the past 20 years. Since the BCS began 5 different SEC programs have won a national title. That is impressive. Most conferences only have 2 power teams at the most. The SEC is overrated this year but let's not be foolish with our statements about it the last 20 years. You give the coots more ammunition
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
On any given year, ########. Do you even read?***
Dec 5, 2013, 3:26 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: Absolutely!
Dec 5, 2013, 12:13 PM
[ in reply to Absolutely! ] |
|
I will agree that if a few more teams can bring their level of play up then the ACC will leap over the Big XII and even the Big 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Re: Absolutely!
Dec 5, 2013, 12:29 PM
|
|
But, you still think there's a huge gap between the SEC? The records will show that 2 or 3 teams have been carrying the SEC water, for years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Absolutely!
Dec 5, 2013, 12:33 PM
|
|
Those teams change, but the power remains. Lets try to be intellectually honest. Over the past 30 years
Georgia
Florida
Auburn
Alabama
Tennessee
LSU
Have all won National Championships, some teams multiple times
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Nobody said that the teams didn't change.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:49 PM
|
|
What you will find, if you look, is that I acknowledge that the MNC has been dominated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mascot [19]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 74
Joined: 5/19/99
|
Re: Absolutely!
Dec 5, 2013, 12:40 PM
[ in reply to Re: Absolutely! ] |
|
What ACC team other than Florida State has won in the past 30 years. Your 1981 national title is the only other ACC team. You cannot count Miami because they were not part of the ACC.
Alabama, Florida, LSU, Aubrun, and Georgia have all won it since 1980.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
GT***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:46 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 848
Joined: 11/27/11
|
Re: ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered
Dec 5, 2013, 12:38 PM
[ in reply to Re: ^^^ This post sounds hot and bothered ] |
|
Wow. Not only are we being trolled by chicken chit, now we get pig chit. Must have gotten lost trying to find the Lou Holtz fan club meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: LOL...bless your ignorant little #### loving heart.***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:11 PM
|
|
Ignorant? Ignorant is believing that a Clem5on team is more deserving of a BCS bid than the team that beat them by 2 touchdowns, has the same record, and also has wins over 3 top 15 teams, that's ignorant. Enjoy your trip to get your brains bashed in because it will be the last time you're allowed to cut in line because you ride the short bus!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 10:35 AM
|
|
Nah, not bothered at all. It help make your story believable if you provided links to said hot and botheredness. Good lucked getting penetrated by another team with a good defense in a BCS bowl while the announcers constantly repeat what "clemsoning" is and referencing the WVU game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
this is great
Dec 5, 2013, 10:39 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: this is great
Dec 5, 2013, 10:44 AM
|
|
Haters gonna hate.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
Exactly...otherwise you wouldn't be here***
Dec 5, 2013, 11:01 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Exactly...otherwise you wouldn't be here***
Dec 5, 2013, 11:06 AM
|
|
Im actually here because I'm bored at my desk and reading some of the sunshine pumping delusional threads in here give me a chuckle. I only visit this message board once a year, around this time, and will soon be going back to the modern era of message boards. (seriously.. if ya'll pay money for this boards premium access.... demand a better format than 1991 aol style)
/cheers
I love all of you orange and purple idiots!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
LOL...
Dec 5, 2013, 11:13 AM
|
|
any #### lover referring to Clemson fans as delusional sunshine pumpers is the epitome of hypocrisy.
You're here because you are butt hurt and bitter that Clemson continues to overshadow $CU even after a fifth consecutive loss.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: LOL...
Dec 5, 2013, 11:16 AM
|
|
This is the exact type of thing I am talking about.
Thanks for the laughs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
As the old saying goes....
Dec 5, 2013, 11:29 AM
|
|
sometimes crying or laughing are the only options left, and laughing feels better right now.
or
Laughing keeps you from killing yourself when things are bad. That and alcohol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: LOL...
Dec 5, 2013, 1:14 PM
[ in reply to LOL... ] |
|
Overshadowed...LOL. Just like I get overshadowed by the little cripple lady with a handicap pass to park in a better spot. That's what the ACC is, your handicap sticker...LOL!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
That is funny....
Dec 5, 2013, 1:19 PM
|
|
coming from the fan of a school whose diplomas double as a handicapped parking plackard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: That is funny....
Dec 5, 2013, 1:22 PM
|
|
That's why I have 3 tater grads calling me boss and working while I'm debating with you!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
That's believable... tell us a little about what you do
Dec 5, 2013, 1:25 PM
|
|
industry-wise? no personal names or corporate specifics clearly... which field of work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: That's believable... tell us a little about what you do
Dec 5, 2013, 1:29 PM
|
|
I am the BOM for a large physician's practice....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
I think you misunderstood....
Dec 5, 2013, 1:29 PM
[ in reply to Re: That is funny.... ] |
|
They actually said quit hossing me which is a verb meaning to annoy someone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: I think you misunderstood....
Dec 5, 2013, 1:36 PM
|
|
well played!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2227]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 5574
Joined: 8/16/05
|
PIC***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:34 PM
[ in reply to Re: LOL... ] |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [39020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 51623
Joined: 11/20/04
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2227]
TigerPulse: 88%
Posts: 5574
Joined: 8/16/05
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21614]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23418
Joined: 8/16/03
|
Really? If I were them I'd be more than happy beating my
Dec 5, 2013, 10:36 AM
|
|
rival 5 years in a row and going to the outback bowl than getting humiliated by FSU at home, losing to my rival by double digits for the 5th year in a row, and going to a BCS bowl because there are no other teams in the ACC with a pulse.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Really? If I were them I'd be more than happy beating my
Dec 5, 2013, 10:38 AM
|
|
This guy gets it!!!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21614]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23418
Joined: 8/16/03
|
Enjoy it while it lasts. We had more reason to think our
Dec 5, 2013, 10:40 AM
|
|
domination would last forever. You have one of the best coaches ever, and are benefiting from being in the best conference. This is your 150-year peak. Savor it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Enjoy it while it lasts. We had more reason to think our
Dec 5, 2013, 10:42 AM
|
|
I disagree but you are entitled to your opinion. The improvements that have occurred in "Cootlumbia" go far beyond just a coach. The money that comes from being in the SEC only means that it's going to get better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Money can only buy you so much.
Dec 5, 2013, 10:46 AM
|
|
What, are y'all gonna just raze Columbia?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [60205]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 42549
Joined: 11/30/98
|
as long as Fla and Tenn stay down..how long is that?
Dec 5, 2013, 10:48 AM
[ in reply to Re: Enjoy it while it lasts. We had more reason to think our ] |
|
one day these guys will stumble upon a competent coaching staff and your glory days will be a distant memory. Of course you already struggle with Tenn and they are horrific now. The 7-5 days will be back sooner rather than later.
But you'll have those sweet memories of those 4th place Obama-era years to savor and cherish. Hope you've bought up all those State newspaper commemorative issues to show your grandkids.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21614]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23418
Joined: 8/16/03
|
You have always had more resources than us. You have
Dec 5, 2013, 10:52 AM
[ in reply to Re: Enjoy it while it lasts. We had more reason to think our ] |
|
always had infrastructural, geographic, demographic, and potential financial advantages over us. Out historical domination over you seems to defy logic.
Without going -6 in the turnover margin, we had a very good chance of beating you this year. Our best player did more to hurt our chances against you than even your coaches well-laid plans.
We were the better team this year in every regard except turnover discipline. If you want rest your confidence on us losing the turnover battle every single year, then go ahead. You won because you are better coached, just like the previous 4 years.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: You have always had more resources than us. You have
Dec 5, 2013, 1:17 PM
|
|
The only thing you've been better at is running up the score on inferior teams. You didn't TURN it over... five of those were forced by the better team and now you're butt-hurt.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Hm, didn't realize scar forced two muffed punts in 1st half***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Hm, didn't realize scar forced two muffed punts in 1st half***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:24 PM
|
|
did you watch the game? There was only one muffed punt. The second fumble on a punt was after he fielded it and tried to run and was stripped. Watkins had an int, Tajh had 2 and a fumble, and 2 off of the return guy, one of which was late in the second half...and I'm ignorant!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Yep, sure did. Bryant was pushed into the ball on the punt***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Yep, sure did. Bryant was pushed into the ball on the punt***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:38 PM
|
|
and that was the muff... you said 2 and you said in the first half, both of which were incorrect. The second fumble on the punt was during the return and he was stripped... or do I need to explain what a muff is. (Either definition is doubtable that you know)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [21614]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 23418
Joined: 8/16/03
|
The coots won fair and square, and were overall the better
Dec 5, 2013, 4:31 PM
|
|
side, but the turnovers were clearly more our fault than to your credit. It doesn't matter, because turnovers are a legitimate part of the game, so losing because of turnovers doesn't some how mean the loss was not legitimate.
But it does mean that your advantages in money have nothing to do with the reason you won. Coaching and a better QB won you that game.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [64517]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88956
Joined: 3/27/01
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Improvements = putting lipstick on pig
Dec 5, 2013, 1:18 PM
|
|
You have Bluff road confused with main street....
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [30764]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 34460
Joined: 6/22/03
|
lol, poor silly coots
Dec 5, 2013, 10:51 AM
|
|
More concerned about flaming Clemson than thirty own welfare. They better hope the bowl selection doesn't change much next year.
The big 10 and sec have the best and most profitable tie ins. They Get paid the most money regardless of records.
A 6-6 USuC gets way more money than a 6-6 Clemson even if Clemson beats south Carolina
300 to 0...and they want tip
change that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: lol, poor silly coots
Dec 5, 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
I thought this was South Carolina football's best years.
And yet they are still complaining about Clemson?
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
Re: lol, poor silly coots
Dec 5, 2013, 10:55 AM
|
|
and I thought they were no longer concerned with Clemson.
And they now owned Clemson, etc...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Enthusiast [145]
TigerPulse: 65%
Posts: 953
Joined: 11/29/04
|
I'll trade places with them--we beat then and they go to----
Dec 5, 2013, 10:52 AM
|
|
bigger bowl and maybe get stomped.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4787]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9986
Joined: 6/12/10
|
well, it it makes usuc fans feel worse, michigan fans feel
Dec 5, 2013, 11:00 AM
|
|
that their loss to usuc, hurt even worse than their loss to appalachian state did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Varsity [237]
TigerPulse: 83%
Posts: 390
Joined: 9/24/01
|
Outside of the National Championship game, they're all...
Dec 5, 2013, 11:01 AM
|
|
...exhibition games that really don't count for anything.
Other than watching your team match up against a different opponent and killing time during the holidays, does anyone really get excited watching the bowls? Don't get me wrong, I enjoy watching my team play wherever we get sent, but I don't make it a point to watch any bowls outside of SC, Clemson, and the championship game.
I think you'd be hard pressed to get the average fan to name off last years bowl matchups and / or winners outside of those games mentioned above (championship, their game, rival).
Am I wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Outside of the National Championship game, they're all...
Dec 5, 2013, 1:20 PM
|
|
Not at all, I mad that same point previously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [82972]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 80112
Joined: 11/29/99
|
They have beaten us 5 straight, I'd just keep my mouth shut.***
Dec 5, 2013, 11:03 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer [23693]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 36824
Joined: 8/19/03
|
Yeah, we need to learn more of this.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:34 PM
|
|
No amount of yakkin' gonna make up for losing on the field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Rose and Sugar? So AU vs UCF and AZ St vs Michy St
Dec 5, 2013, 11:04 AM
|
|
will be more appealing games to the nation?
What if FSU beats OSU by 30? May lessen the blow of our 37 point loss in a game in which we gave them the ball on our 30 going in,after our 1st offensive snap, followed by tajh being stripped while rolling the wrong way, resulting in a scoop and score on our 2nd possession.... this after the #1 team in the country had an extra week to prepare.
And we were tied with lowly scar in the 4th with 4 turnovers, 2 self inflicted (at scar... holder of longest active home winning streak... which is a joke bc they haven't played aTm, Bama, LSU, or a healthy AU, UF or UGA team there in the past two years). Just funny they think they're a legit
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Rose and Sugar? So AU vs UCF and AZ St vs Michy St
Dec 5, 2013, 1:26 PM
|
|
If we're not legit than what is the team that has lost 5 straight to us... a joke?
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 11:06 AM
|
|
Contender and deserving of anything less than mediocre when they couldn't win the easiest sec east division in the last 20 years. No Mizzouri is not good. They never came close to winning the big 12 DIVISION. Lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:27 PM
|
|
again you're sorely misinformed. We've only won the east once but we've done it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2418]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6496
Joined: 11/17/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 11:08 AM
|
|
If we beat SCar, had 10 wins and ended up in the Peach and they went to the Sugar, we would have our fare share of sour grapes.
I honestly am not saying anything about much SCar until we beat them again. They have earned the right to talk and say anything they want at this point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 11:11 AM
|
|
South Carolina goes to Cotton or Cap One. Write it down, stick it in your back pocket & then take it to the bank come this Sunday. All this Outback stuff is wishful Tiger thinking.
Still don't understand why our fan base is more worried about where the Coots go then where we go & who we play.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [76]
TigerPulse: 28%
Posts: 111
Joined: 2/6/11
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:09 PM
|
|
this guy gets it
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and***
Dec 5, 2013, 11:16 AM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Is sinister upset?
Dec 5, 2013, 11:17 AM
|
|
congrats on your clearly not so important desk job... sorry you couldn't gain more satisfaction by coming here looking for a laugh or two while attempting to troll
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: Is sinister upset?
Dec 5, 2013, 11:23 AM
|
|
I did more than attempt to troll, at first it was subtle, and even when I threw out a blatantly shiny hook, many of you still grabbed it and ran with it. No worries though I have posted many links to this board on the SEC board where everyone over laughs at this pathetic site and the posters on it. Many funnies were had, but i grow weary of watching the field mice scurry around, Think I will return to the land of competent people where at least a decent football conversation can be had without the what if's, woulda, shoulda, couldas....
/cheers
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
SEC....SEC....SEC
Dec 5, 2013, 11:28 AM
|
|
SEC board? Well, I'll give you that you may very well find stimulating football conversation there. I, personally, wouldn't know because, I don't troll around in my big Brother's room.
If you think that there is a huge chasm dividing these two teams, you would best be served at FGF.
|
|
|
|
|
|
1st Rounder [639]
TigerPulse: 74%
Posts: 3848
Joined: 8/13/09
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5576]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 848
Joined: 11/27/11
|
Re: Is sinister upset?
Dec 5, 2013, 12:48 PM
[ in reply to Re: Is sinister upset? ] |
|
Can they actually read on the SEC board?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Is sinister upset?
Dec 5, 2013, 1:30 PM
[ in reply to Re: Is sinister upset? ] |
|
don't forget the ifs and buts....
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Land of competent ppl such as yourself, huh? Why the need to try and impress such a pathetic crowd by
Dec 5, 2013, 11:44 AM
|
|
Desperately trying to assure your superiority over us? Sounds a bit defensive to me. An overly defensive approach normally means your normally lying about that which you claim to be true. Link this thread all you want, fact of the matter is ( trying not to laugh) the Mizzouri Tigers just won your division, aka... joke's on you bc your program has reached it's ceiling. Every other sec school is making the same amount of $ as you are, they're recruiting better, they (like you) have little to no regard for rules and thus will also be juiced up, and their 3&4 star juicers will outperform your 2&3 star juicers, unfortunately. You'll never make the playoff so long as it stays at four teams, and if it ever moves to 8, we'll be there waiting for your once in a decade appearance to throttle your ### when we BOTH actually have something on the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oculus Spirit [93604]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 95383
Joined: 12/25/09
|
Yet they'll boast of how good it is to be an SEC team.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:11 PM
|
|
I swear, they are no more to the SEC than a dog licking the bone after master eats.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Oh okay bookmaker, so you were deservo***
Dec 5, 2013, 12:21 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [53]
TigerPulse: 33%
Posts: 173
Joined: 12/16/11
|
That's not true at all Completely Solid Orange
Dec 5, 2013, 12:30 PM
|
|
Clemson was a military school, that definitely gave you an advantage in football in the early years.
Secondly, that's just blind homerism to believe the only reason you lost was because of turnovers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
I like your logic here.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:53 PM
|
|
So, let's see...CU was a military school so, had an advantage. We played EVERY game on YOUR home field.
I assume that you believe that you have an advantage, being in the SEC. Why not play all games at DV? Not that that seems to make any difference, lately.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 12:32 PM
|
|
Remember ACC #23 ranked fsu stomped you in the peach that year. (your best year ever). And you believe you should've been in a bcs game last year, over LSU and UGA who were both 1 play away from the natty title game? Haha We had to show LSU which conference was actually boss though, since we couldn't do it by losing close ones to highly ranked SEC teams who were highly ranked bc they lost close ones to other overrated highly ranked sec teams. LoLLLLL
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 12:35 PM
|
|
Oh okay bookmaker, so you were deserving of a bcs bowl over us right after getting thrashed at a neutral site 56-17 by the same team we took into OT at their place? Remember the ACCs #23 ranked fsu stomped you in the peach that year. (your best year ever). And you believe you should've been in a bcs game last year, over LSU and UGA who were both 1 play away from the natty title game? Haha We had to show LSU which conference was actually boss though, since we couldn't do it by losing close ones to highly ranked SEC teams who were highly ranked bc they lost close ones to other overrated highly ranked sec teams. LoLLLLL
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 12:38 PM
|
|
COOT...why you so butthurt?!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ring of Honor [26353]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 13702
Joined: 8/18/13
|
This thread escalated quickly.
Dec 5, 2013, 12:51 PM
|
|
I mean this really got out of hand fast!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [53]
TigerPulse: 33%
Posts: 173
Joined: 12/16/11
|
If every game at Williams Brice
Dec 5, 2013, 12:58 PM
|
|
Was such an advantage, why didn't we win more?
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [11208]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 18394
Joined: 2/2/03
|
Why do some struggle with the threads here?
Dec 5, 2013, 1:02 PM
|
|
It's because y'all sucked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Why do some struggle with the threads here?
Dec 5, 2013, 1:43 PM
|
|
Because those vicious crowds of the 20's 30's and 40' were so classless and hid the facemasks and made them use leather helmets.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:24 PM
|
|
Why are you so butthurt COOT....didn't you win Saturday?!!!
You must like coming over here and being abused...definitely speaks for your intelligence!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:25 PM
|
|
Are you the fry manager?!!!
Lmao
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:45 PM
|
|
says the genius who can't even respond to the right post.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 1:47 PM
|
|
WHY IS MY TIGER PULSE STILL SO HIGH???????
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [51524]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 43075
Joined: 8/10/04
|
They should be. They're a better team than us.***
Dec 5, 2013, 1:59 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devotee [322]
TigerPulse: 52%
Posts: 826
Joined: 9/17/10
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 2:01 PM
|
|
With the bowl tie-ins, it is very difficult to get a BCS bowl in the SEC if you are not in the championship game. Sucks, but true. Don't believe me, check out the bowl tie-ins.
In fact, being in the championship game doesn't even guaratee a BCS bowl game...when they were in that game in 2010, they went to the chick-fil-a.
Here is a crazy stat...they have been to the SEC title game in the past 4 years as many times as Bama has...including 2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
love how usc jr flaunts their one championship (ACC) in 110 years worth of football
Dec 5, 2013, 2:40 PM
|
|
Your tiger pulse is high bc there's THAT many pathetic fgf lurkers in here thumbs upping every dumb ### post you make. LSU game was special since they were one play away from a natty title appearance. Unlike when usc jr made it there after being about 35 play away such a game. Remember AU won 56-17? It was embarrassing for the whole state. At least we took em into OT on their home terf that year to make the state look a lil less pathetic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: love how usc jr flaunts their one championship (ACC) in 110 years worth of football
Dec 5, 2013, 2:47 PM
|
|
another couple of moral "victories" for you to hold on to...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
Re: love how usc jr flaunts their one championship (ACC) in 110 years worth of football
Dec 5, 2013, 2:52 PM
[ in reply to love how usc jr flaunts their one championship (ACC) in 110 years worth of football ] |
|
The Coots also played Auburn on the road the week after Clemson did that year and lost by 4 points. If I remember correctly Jeffrey had the ball in his hands for the winning TD on the final drive but dropped it
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rock Defender [53]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 35
Joined: 11/30/98
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
LOL office branch manager? of a large physicians firm?
Dec 5, 2013, 2:57 PM
|
|
Is what you're claiming you do? I call bull ##### times a thousand. First off, picking up dry cleaning for an irrelevant non-doctorate type of employee working under a physician is unrealistic. You'd be the ##### in the office anyways, and that physician (s) wouldn't pay for someone on the clock to do bitchh work for an pawn in their system. You're easily replaceable with no meaningful credentials.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [83]
TigerPulse: 29%
Posts: 221
Joined: 10/27/13
|
Re: LOL office branch manager? of a large physicians firm?
Dec 5, 2013, 4:45 PM
|
|
BOM = Business Office manager, know it all... you are just full of incorrect info today aren't you. So why couldn't I have an assistant that helps me out?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 354
Joined: 11/28/10
|
Seems to me
Dec 5, 2013, 3:39 PM
|
|
That all the talk about the bowl game being the outback is retarded considering the two most likely destinations are capital one or cotton bowl.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1788]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4131
Joined: 11/25/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 4:36 PM
|
|
Tell 'em COOT!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [224]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 51
Joined: 10/27/13
|
I imagine you don't find joy watching bowl games
Dec 5, 2013, 5:06 PM
|
|
I wouldn't make it a point to watch the Outback bowl either
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rooter [224]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 51
Joined: 10/27/13
|
A 'tater' would steal your job in a second if he/she applied***
Dec 5, 2013, 5:09 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Just told you... bc A. you're full of ##### and B. You're not smart enough to have 2 clemson grads working under you
Dec 5, 2013, 5:13 PM
|
|
The unintelligible aspect is quite clearly based strictly on your posts in the forum. Only you could possibly maintain such a position is if your parents own the place or are best friends with those that do. Either way, the clemson dry cleaning claim is far from very far from the truth.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [15]
TigerPulse: 15%
Posts: 83
Joined: 12/4/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 5:24 PM
|
|
Gotta admit, you guys going to the Orange Bowl stings ! But that's what we get playing in the SEC and having a two team limit on the BCS. That noise is going away, so......ICE UP SON ! You got Bama on the horizon, don't worry about us Coots !
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 354
Joined: 11/28/10
|
I feel confident that
Dec 5, 2013, 5:26 PM
|
|
USC will be in cotton or capital one. We don't even have to beg either. Aw schucks, they actually just want us.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [64]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 140
Joined: 7/10/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 5:29 PM
|
|
I've heard more Clemson fans complaining about losing 5 straight than Gamecock fans complaining about their bowl selection.
Recent word is that they are going to the Cotton bowl. I'll believe it when I see it and think the end up in the Chickfila Bowl.
Either way it doesn't look likely that they go back to Tampa this year
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [440]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 384
Joined: 10/18/13
|
haha all you columbia b itches can whine all you want. Clemson is nationally recognized. The South Carolina Gamecocks...are not. for a reason.***
Dec 5, 2013, 5:29 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3968]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3228
Joined: 10/20/11
|
Coots might***
Dec 5, 2013, 5:33 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Really? I know that Slurrier and dirtlumbia media are politicking the hell out of it..
Dec 5, 2013, 5:33 PM
|
|
But every professional college football analyst I've seen thus far has LSU and Mizzou in Cap1 & Cotton. Some project aTm in cotton... but none that I've seen show usc jr anywhere other than outback or chic fil a bowl against duke or or a banged up miami... LOL. Hilarious.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3968]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3228
Joined: 10/20/11
|
Coots might not even make it to a bowl next year...
Dec 5, 2013, 5:34 PM
|
|
Better enjoy this one while it last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [64]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 140
Joined: 7/10/13
|
Re: Coots might not even make it to a bowl next year...
Dec 5, 2013, 5:41 PM
|
|
Well this is just wishful thinking. They only lose two starters on offense
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [3968]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3228
Joined: 10/20/11
|
Re: Coots might not even make it to a bowl next year...
Dec 5, 2013, 5:51 PM
|
|
...and one of those guys was your entire offense against us.
Add that with a defense that won't be able to stop a high school team and other SEC teams recruiting at a much higher level and you end up with SC not even being bowl eligible.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [64]
TigerPulse: 20%
Posts: 140
Joined: 7/10/13
|
Re: Coots might not even make it to a bowl next year...
Dec 5, 2013, 6:52 PM
|
|
Shaw's ability to run the ball was a big part of the offense. But suggesting they aren't going to make a bowl is clearly wishful thinking. Replacing both starting CBs will be difficult but the rest of the defense will be solid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1095]
TigerPulse: 55%
Posts: 3051
Joined: 9/13/13
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and***
Dec 5, 2013, 5:35 PM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 354
Joined: 11/28/10
|
Onederkid thanks for playing
Dec 5, 2013, 7:00 PM
|
|
college
Have a nice day
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fan [63]
TigerPulse: 24%
Posts: 354
Joined: 11/28/10
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rookie [14]
TigerPulse: 21%
Posts: 36
Joined: 1/5/12
|
Re: Coots are very hot and bothered by us being in the best BCS bowl game this year and
Dec 5, 2013, 7:04 PM
|
|
don't let us down against Alabama.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 146
| visibility 1
|
|
|
50
