|
Replies: 20
| visibility 51
|
CU Guru [1983]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/31/07
|
A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 11:32 AM
|
|
that a "top" level team in the nation is encouraging one of Clemson's top D lineman to transfer.
My first thought is Ruke and Michigan since he's behind BB and probably could be starting elsewhere. That and Harbaugh is a dbag.
Surely coach knows this if it's being reported by a website. Providing there's evidence, it would be awesome if they were exposed for tampering.
|
|
|
|
 |
CU Medallion [64519]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 88961
Joined: 3/27/01
|
It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact....
Apr 21, 2022, 11:41 AM
|
|
which is not an uncommon occurrence because of the transfer portal and NIL $$$$.
Not implying that happened. Just sayin'.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1983]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/31/07
|
Re: It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact....
Apr 21, 2022, 11:43 AM
|
|
True but i think in this case they are implying said team is initiating.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16900]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 10763
Joined: 1/25/07
|
Re: It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact....
Apr 21, 2022, 12:14 PM
[ in reply to It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact.... ] |
|
Doesn’t that player have to be in the portal before making contact. I know no one so enforcing this stuff, but at least technically isn’t that supposed to be the case?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4947]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 6980
Joined: 10/12/06
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [4186]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3116
Joined: 4/15/05
|
Re: It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact....
Apr 21, 2022, 2:18 PM
[ in reply to It ain't tampering if the player initiated the contact.... ] |
|
It doesn’t matter anymore who initiates contact. Get use to it…..it’s called college football. Wait until you see some QB that’s paid 4-5 million to come to their school and then ask for 7-10 the next season or he’s gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Medallion [52020]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 22979
Joined: 10/10/11
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 11:47 AM
|
|
If true, this is an example of what Dabo was referring to as tampering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [380]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 204
Joined: 12/9/21
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 12:07 PM
|
|
Exactly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [380]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 204
Joined: 12/9/21
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 12:07 PM
|
|
Is it Ron Cherry?
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend [16430]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 14909
Joined: 1/26/99
|
Harbaugh is giving him the business? You heard it here first
Apr 21, 2022, 12:10 PM
|
|
!
|
|
|
|
|
|
Starter [380]
TigerPulse: 84%
Posts: 204
Joined: 12/9/21
|
Re: Harbaugh is giving him the business? You heard it here first
Apr 21, 2022, 12:25 PM
|
|
It was definitely a personal foul.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5678]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 3337
Joined: 9/1/03
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 12:39 PM
|
|
Tampering is evidently pretty commonplace now and NCAA is doing nothing about it. I think Dabo mentioned that is another problem with the portal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Orange Blooded [2140]
TigerPulse: 92%
Posts: 1393
Joined: 8/15/06
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 2:43 PM
|
|
Just to be clear the NCAA won't do anything because Kegan precedent has been set and they have no authority ant longer
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-TigerNet [10401]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 11533
Joined: 6/29/01
|
I don't think there is such a thing as tampering anymore due
Apr 21, 2022, 12:52 PM
|
|
to the transfer portal and NIL. Anything goes. Anytime.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [5512]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 4986
Joined: 10/21/15
|
Re: I don't think there is such a thing as tampering anymore due
Apr 22, 2022, 1:49 PM
|
|
It is technically against the rules for a school to contact a player that is not already in the portal. That would be tampering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
MVP [544]
TigerPulse: 99%
Posts: 496
Joined: 10/20/19
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 1:28 PM
|
|
What baffles me is you consider Michigan a top team. Are we back in 1997? j/k
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1983]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 2203
Joined: 5/31/07
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 2:15 PM
|
|
It's debatable for sure but they did make the playoffs last year even though they took a beating. We know for sure know it's not usuc. UM was just my guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-Conference [440]
TigerPulse: 90%
Posts: 384
Joined: 10/18/13
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 2:38 PM
|
|
Where is this coming from? I do not see a story about it anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
110%er [8445]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 5244
Joined: 9/7/09
|
If you don’t think enough of the source to even post
Apr 21, 2022, 2:39 PM
|
|
It’s name then don’t bother repeating the rumor.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All-In [31200]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 9116
Joined: 8/31/15
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 21, 2022, 3:04 PM
|
|
It’s 50/50 imo on tampering. Just like free agency. No consequences so what does it matter anymore.
|
|
|
|
|
|
CU Guru [1669]
TigerPulse: 100%
Posts: 1748
Joined: 11/20/07
|
Re: A Clemson site that shall not be named is reporting
Apr 22, 2022, 1:57 PM
|
|
Just like buggery.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Replies: 20
| visibility 51
|
|
|
50
