Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
WSJ article not quite as good as the NY Times last month
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 10
| visibility 1,105

WSJ article not quite as good as the NY Times last month


Oct 18, 2013, 12:54 AM

but not bad!
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702304384104579141383245406124

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up



Corporations are people. So is Soylent Green.


Not bad? The WSJ article is riddled with factual errors, a


Oct 18, 2013, 2:24 AM

ton of poor context, mischaracterizations, and a LOT of selective omissions that support our bias.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Not bad? Agree, thisvwriter is a coot - did not even


Oct 18, 2013, 4:04 AM

Mention our record against Usuc! And lots of old dubious info!

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Very high probability...***


Oct 18, 2013, 4:43 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


He went to Duke***


Oct 18, 2013, 5:09 AM [ in reply to Re: Not bad? Agree, thisvwriter is a coot - did not even ]



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Clemson doesn't care about basketball....as evidenced by Brown-L getting 14 years.


So that's why he's butt hurt...***


Oct 18, 2013, 5:15 AM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


so why didn't he mention that most people think


Oct 18, 2013, 8:21 AM [ in reply to He went to Duke*** ]

Duke is in NJ?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What factual errors?***


Oct 18, 2013, 5:35 AM [ in reply to Not bad? The WSJ article is riddled with factual errors, a ]



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-15yr.jpgringofhonor-jospehg.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


52% Gamecocks / 25% Clemson fans in SC?


Oct 18, 2013, 7:49 AM

Hogwash.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 52% Gamecocks / 25% Clemson fans in SC?


Oct 18, 2013, 9:02 AM

Those polls can't measure fan intensity or commitment.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: WSJ article not quite as good as the NY Times last month


Oct 18, 2013, 9:41 AM

Unless I missed it, he ignored the longest string of success our program has had. He mentioned 1981 then picked up with 1992. The years in between were collectively our most successful. Of course he can (pretend to) make the case that we're delusional because we've never been successful, if he ignores the years we were successful. Kinda like "well, take away 2 big plays and we'd have won". Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 10
| visibility 1,105
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic