Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
One spot on roster available now...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 9
| visibility 1

One spot on roster available now...


Apr 26, 2022, 7:30 PM

But Clemson is still involved with a number of transfers including PG Hunter McIntosh who has them in his top 3 with a decision soon. Also Clemson contacted about three new transfers today including a good Big forward from Donlon's old team UMKC.
Maybe one of the young big guys I'd transfering:

Here is Donlon's former player

https://twitter.com/Portaltalk1/status/1519038738076106752?s=20&t=4XF9chCR-MAAOfqgwNBUyg

Good lead guard from HP

https://twitter.com/DushawnLondon1/status/1519018794114600960?s=20&t=4XF9chCR-MAAOfqgwNBUyg

Really good wing from SDST

https://twitter.com/247HSHoops/status/1519012772696178689?s=20&t=4XF9chCR-MAAOfqgwNBUyg

Good wing from the Bonnies


https://twitter.com/GoodmanHoops/status/1519091191060566016?s=20&t=4XF9chCR-MAAOfqgwNBUyg

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Need height and scoring


Apr 26, 2022, 7:48 PM

Whether at PG or PF… I would like to see Tyson on the wing instead of the 4. I thought Naz should have gotten more minutes down low last year.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I would also like to see Tyson at the 3.


Apr 26, 2022, 10:51 PM

That allows Hall to play his more natural position at the 4. This assumes that Middlebrooks can be the starter and give us good minutes at the 5.

In this scenario, Schieffelin would be the primary big off the bench and would still see good minutes. The two freshmen forwards (Wiggins at PF and Godfrey at SF) will also have an opportunity to get meaningful minutes.

Given this, I don’t think we need a big man from the portal unless we expect to lose someone. Also, the risk of getting a big guy from the portal is that it might cause one of our current guys to leave. Unfortunately that’s the reality in college basketball today.

I think we need to focus on a PG from the portal that handles the ball well. He doesn’t have to be a scorer, but it would certainly be nice if he can create off the bounce and hit the 3 with some consistency. It would also be nice if he is at least 6’2” so he isn’t at a big size disadvantage.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

"All those 'Fire Brownell' guys can kiss it." -Joseph Girard III

"Everybody needs to know that Coach Brownell is arguably the best coach to come through Clemson." -PJ Hall


Agreed.***


Apr 26, 2022, 10:54 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I would also like to see Tyson at the 3.


Apr 26, 2022, 11:08 PM [ in reply to I would also like to see Tyson at the 3. ]


That allows Hall to play his more natural position at the 4. This assumes that Middlebrooks can be the starter and give us good minutes at the 5.

In this scenario, Schieffelin would be the primary big off the bench and would still see good minutes. The two freshmen forwards (Wiggins at PF and Godfrey at SF) will also have an opportunity to get meaningful minutes.

Given this, I don’t think we need a big man from the portal unless we expect to lose someone. Also, the risk of getting a big guy from the portal is that it might cause one of our current guys to leave. Unfortunately that’s the reality in college basketball today.

I think we need to focus on a PG from the portal that handles the ball well. He doesn’t have to be a scorer, but it would certainly be nice if he can create off the bounce and hit the 3 with some consistency. It would also be nice if he is at least 6’2” so he isn’t at a big size disadvantage.


And who is the big wing who replaces Collins output. A 6-4 or taller strong presence on the boards too?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Plenty of height


Apr 27, 2022, 10:32 AM

There's plenty of height with a starting lineup that includes Tyson, Schieffelin, and Hall that has Middlebrooks off the bench with the freshmen.

PG is still the number one priority. As others stated, the PG doesn't need to score, but he needs to be a good facilitator.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I would also like to see Tyson at the 3.


Apr 27, 2022, 7:36 AM [ in reply to I would also like to see Tyson at the 3. ]


That allows Hall to play his more natural position at the 4. This assumes that Middlebrooks can be the starter and give us good minutes at the 5.

In this scenario, Schieffelin would be the primary big off the bench and would still see good minutes. The two freshmen forwards (Wiggins at PF and Godfrey at SF) will also have an opportunity to get meaningful minutes.

Given this, I don’t think we need a big man from the portal unless we expect to lose someone. Also, the risk of getting a big guy from the portal is that it might cause one of our current guys to leave. Unfortunately that’s the reality in college basketball today.

I think we need to focus on a PG from the portal that handles the ball well. He doesn’t have to be a scorer, but it would certainly be nice if he can create off the bounce and hit the 3 with some consistency. It would also be nice if he is at least 6’2” so he isn’t at a big size disadvantage.



I agree with this, although I think I would go with Tyson SF, Schef PF, and Hall C.

This would give us a little more quickness without losing much size.

We def need a PG still and that's what I would go after with the 1 remaining spot.

I really hope that Godfrey is ready to come in and play some minutes as a back up SF ASAP. He already has the size.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: I would also like to see Tyson at the 3.


Apr 27, 2022, 7:43 AM


I agree with this, although I think I would go with Tyson SF, Schef PF, and Hall C.


with you on this... i liked seeing Ian & PJ on the floor together

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Can't see Tyson guarding an athletic 3


Apr 27, 2022, 4:06 PM [ in reply to I would also like to see Tyson at the 3. ]

on the perimeter. He's just not quick enough

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Better at 2 guard because


Apr 27, 2022, 4:18 PM

Most teams play right handed with their ‘slasher ’ and Tyson would be on the left with the spot up shooter. It would allow him to be weak side help defense and keep him in place to be the good rebounder he is.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Replies: 9
| visibility 1
Archives - Tiger Boards Archive
add New Topic