Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 21
| visibility 1

Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.


May 23, 2022, 1:34 PM

Injunction (mostly) upheld regarding the DeSantis Social Media bill. NOT LOOKING GOOD FOR THINGS WITH DISNEY IF THIS IS ANY INDICATION.

https://twitter.com/AriCohn/status/1528766279179505665

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.


May 23, 2022, 1:40 PM

So, this means that men CAN get pregnant??

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.


May 23, 2022, 1:45 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.


May 23, 2022, 1:47 PM

^^^^ winner. President elect DeSantis set a trap.

military_donation.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.***


May 23, 2022, 1:48 PM [ in reply to Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court. ]



2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


LOL, sure.***


May 23, 2022, 2:10 PM



2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.***


May 23, 2022, 2:10 PM [ in reply to You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.*** ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.***


May 23, 2022, 2:16 PM

"When you’re not just moderating based on your TOS and you’re actively promoting content, censoring content, and using hidden algorithms to limit opposing viewpoints, then you’re a publisher."

This is wrong. This is not reflected in the article you posted. And given this is the central premise of your argument, I again emphasize you do not understand Section 230.

Here's the sauce:

This is from Sen. Ron Wyden, who, literally, wrote the bill: "There's not a single word in Section 230 that requires neutrality….The point was essentially to let ‘lots of flowers bloom.’ If you want to have a conservative platform, more power to you...If you want to have a progressive platform, more power to you."

Link: https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2021/04/eff-30-protecting-free-speech-senator-ron-wyden


This is from the court's opinion today: "We conclude that social-media platforms’ content-moderation activities—permitting, removing, prioritizing, and deprioritizing users and posts—constitute “speech” within the meaning of the First Amendment. All but one of S.B. 7072’s operative provisions implicate platforms’ First Amendment rights and are therefore subject to First Amendment scrutiny."

Link: https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202112355.pdf

You are:



2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.***


May 23, 2022, 2:23 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I've posted how you are wrong.


May 23, 2022, 2:26 PM

Provided evidence how you are wrong.

Even cited the man who wrote the bill, proving you are wrong.

But you have every right to remain being wrong because this is America and that's never stopped anyone before.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: I've posted how you are wrong.


May 23, 2022, 2:34 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh okay! I got it. Hypothetically you are correct!


May 23, 2022, 3:09 PM

Mark that one as a big win for you. But in its current state...

CONGRESS has already decided you're wrong. The bill's author says so.

COURTS have already decided you're wrong. The decision today (and some others) say so.

But sure. By golly, if congress changes things up with new bills or amendments to the existing wording you have a #### fine shot at being right! Good luck!

(PS, the absolute cherry on top was you posting a source doc that in no way mentioned your argument. I'm going to glow on that one for at least the next five minutes.)

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Addendum: The reason I didn't "debate" the Disney comment


May 23, 2022, 3:12 PM

was because it was a dig at you nuts for associating some irrelevant court decision as "win." There is, of course, no tie to Disney, just as there was, of course, no relevance to DeSantis' "win" against three people who had no standing.

Keep up.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: Addendum: The reason I didn't "debate" the Disney comment


May 23, 2022, 3:17 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Redoing this reply because you haven't earned the cop-out.


May 23, 2022, 3:20 PM

You are actually wrong again. The appeals court decision does matter, insofar as until a higher court takes up the case and vacates the position, the essence of the bill is dead. DEAD.

Will that change? Possibly, but the law's statutory construction (made pretty clear by comments of the authors), and the decision today, would suggest you're fighting an uphill battle. But go ahead hang your hat on the hypothetical that one day you may be right in the future, if that helps alleviate the sting of being continuously wrong in the present.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Okayyyyy


May 23, 2022, 3:40 PM



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yeah? You're still wrong.***


May 23, 2022, 3:45 PM



2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Before replying, do yourself a favor...


May 23, 2022, 2:24 PM [ in reply to Re: You don't understand Section 230. But nice try.*** ]

And read this:

https://www.techdirt.com/2020/06/23/hello-youve-been-referred-here-because-youre-wrong-about-section-230-communications-decency-act/


2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court.


May 23, 2022, 1:47 PM

I post this only for the DeSantis cheerleaders who think they win when he "wins":



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

[Catahoula] used to be almost solely a PnR rascal, but now has adopted shidpoasting with a passion. -bengaline

You are the meme master. - RPMcMurphy®

Trump is not a phony. - RememberTheDanny


alley


May 23, 2022, 1:49 PM

oop

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Re: Yikes. DeSantis loses BIG in court. Troll bait worked


May 24, 2022, 12:22 AM

Well, you sure had fun with the troll-bait post.

Of course the Disney / Desantis matter had zero to do with the 'comparison cases' which you had cited.

Whatever Desantis' motives were, his legal action to have a special tax district / special competitive advantage vs. non-Disney entertainment venue competitors allows him to legally discontinue that 'special tax district' privilege for Disney in 2023.

The other examples of companies being platforms or publishers are irrelevant to the Diseny / Desantis matter.

But congrats ... you hooked several fish (both the Disney lovers and Desantis lovers) with the post.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You're my white whale, Danny.


May 24, 2022, 8:56 AM

One of these days imma getcha.

2024 purple level member flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

drunk at the putt putt.


Replies: 21
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic