Tiger Board Logo

Donor's Den General Leaderboards TNET coins™ POTD Hall of Fame Map FAQ
GIVE AN AWARD
Use your TNET coins™ to grant this post a special award!

W
50
Big Brain
90
Love it!
100
Cheers
100
Helpful
100
Made Me Smile
100
Great Idea!
150
Mind Blown
150
Caring
200
Flammable
200
Hear ye, hear ye
200
Bravo
250
Nom Nom Nom
250
Take My Coins
500
Ooo, Shiny!
700
Treasured Post!
1000

YOUR BALANCE
I guess this is what we all have to forward to...
storage This topic has been archived - replies are not allowed.
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic
Replies: 54
| visibility 1

I guess this is what we all have to forward to...


Jun 4, 2013, 4:11 PM

http://washingtonexaminer.com/sebelius-wont-waive-regulation-for-girl-with-five-weeks-to-live-someone-lives-and-someone-dies/article/2531097

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

death panels, lol.***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:12 PM



2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Horribly stressful decisions where either option results


Jun 4, 2013, 4:14 PM

in someone's death? Hobson's Choices for all, yay.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Not death panels


Jun 4, 2013, 4:18 PM

She doesn't qualify for the adult lung transplant based on survivability %. If you give her an adult lung, then an adult who would have a better chance of actually surviving the transplant doesn't get one. It's a hard choice to make, but non the less a choice has to be made. Roll the dice on the girl, or give the lung to someone who has a better chance. Or maybe Kathleen Sebelius just enjoys killing people.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

so it is death panels then


Jun 4, 2013, 4:20 PM

the gov gets to decide who gets treatment and who doesn't. So and 80 yr old have less survivability for cancer treatment than a 30 yrs old, so #### em.

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg2005_majors_champ.jpgbadge-ringofhonor-xtiger.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So your argument goes something like this


Jun 4, 2013, 4:24 PM

Because a decision has to be made on a limited resource (in this case lungs) the same decision will also be made on a relatively unlimited resource like cancer treatment.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

All decisions are made on a limited resource


Jun 4, 2013, 4:30 PM

MONEY!!

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Cancer drugs, while expensive, are not limited


Jun 4, 2013, 4:31 PM

We can afford to pay for them if we make that choice. No amount of money can pay for a donor lung.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Money is not limited?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:36 PM

Quite the liberal mind set on ya! ;)

2024 white level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

MauldinT, where are you???


Re: Money is not limited?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:40 PM

.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Sweet, so money is limited


Jun 4, 2013, 4:42 PM

Then if it's a choice between the 80 year old and the 30 year old, who you backing. Oh, wait, no, money is limited unless you want healthcare.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Nope, money is only not an issue when it comes to healthcare


Jun 4, 2013, 4:40 PM [ in reply to Money is not limited? ]

At least that's my understanding from this conversation.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Doctors wrote the guidelines. Sebelius is not moving


Jun 4, 2013, 9:55 PM [ in reply to so it is death panels then ]

away from those guidelines.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

She just enjoys killing 10 year olds


Jun 4, 2013, 9:57 PM

That is obviously the only reason. She as a politician she should overrule the doctors that came up with the law because a politician shouldn't come between doctors and medical care..wait...wut?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

just throwing out a couple of other options:


Jun 4, 2013, 4:20 PM [ in reply to Not death panels ]

one of her parents can give up their lungs to save her.

or we can base the waiting list on IQ. who cares if dumb people don't get lungs??

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


better than looking at IQs even,


Jun 4, 2013, 4:22 PM

we could look at her IQ, her DNA, her parents' health records, her parents' education levels, etc. using that info, surely we can decide if she's worth a lung or not, right?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


Her BMI should be top criteria.***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:24 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Or better yet


Jun 4, 2013, 4:26 PM [ in reply to better than looking at IQs even, ]

We could look at the medical data available and decide that there is a reason why doctors have separated child and adult lung transplant lists, and give the lung to an adult who has a better chance of surviving the operation. As mentioned there are 40 adults also waiting for lungs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So, its death panels then.***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:27 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Nope


Jun 4, 2013, 4:30 PM

It's a choice between who gets to live, the adult with the better chance of surviving or the kid. In this choice one person has to die. I didn't make the rules, you might want to talk to God about this one.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

The thing is, the choice should be between her, her family,


Jun 4, 2013, 4:34 PM

and her doctors. HHS statistical analysis should never come into play. The rulebook you are falling back on does not work for every situation.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


but if her parents weren't such lazy turds, they would have


Jun 4, 2013, 4:36 PM

more money and could afford a cheap chinese lung, amirite?

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


So her doctor can decide that she deserves a lung


Jun 4, 2013, 4:39 PM [ in reply to The thing is, the choice should be between her, her family, ]

What about the doctor of the other patient, I'm pretty sure he thinks his patient deserves a lung. I can't tell if you are trolling or if you legitimately don't understand that there isn't some stockpile of lungs laying around. A person dies in a car accident and someone gets a lung. The choice is an adult who is on the adult list, who has a higher chance of surviving, or a child on the adult list with a lower chance of surviving. Someone is not getting a lung, and that decision has to be made.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

clearly, whoever can write the bigger check should get the


Jun 4, 2013, 4:41 PM

lung. one good way to break the cycle of poverty. ;)

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


The decision HHS made was to deny her a spot


Jun 4, 2013, 4:49 PM [ in reply to So her doctor can decide that she deserves a lung ]

on the waiting list. I can't tell if you are trolling or if you legitimately don't understand that it isn't the federal governments place to set hard and fast rules on medical decisions.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Who makes the rules now?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:53 PM

“The medical evidence and the transplant doctors who are making the rule — and have had the rule in place since 2005 making a delineation between pediatric and adult lungs, because lungs are different that other organs — that it’s based on the survivability [chances].”

Wait is says there transplant doctors. Did you skip over that part?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

What about this part?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:59 PM

"medical professionals think Murneghan could survive an adult lung transplant."

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


You mean her doctors


Jun 4, 2013, 5:01 PM

Isn't their job to advocate for their patient? I bet the adult has a doctor that will say the same thing. Maybe if he's short enough they will let him be on the kid list as well.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

So you are saying the death panel decision should stand.***


Jun 4, 2013, 5:02 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


So how do you propose these organs be handed out


Jun 4, 2013, 5:05 PM

Since there can be no rules, and everyone doctor is going to say that their patient is the best candidate?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

If NCLB taught us anything, it is that decisions that


Jun 4, 2013, 5:48 PM

affect individuals should not be made at the federal level.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Great plan, I'm sure the "just not federal"


Jun 4, 2013, 6:11 PM

organ donation plan will run smoothly. You want it at a state level then, because someone, somewhere along the line is going to have to make the choice. I suppose whoever it is that finally has to make the choice (because making that choice sure isn't a job I want) is going to crucified by you?

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

so you think these decisions have always been


Jun 4, 2013, 9:51 PM

made federally? Really? Surely you realize your rulebook is new, and that making the decisions locally has worked as well as possible since transplants began, right?

Are you afraid that if hospital systems are allowed to contine to make the decision based on individual cases, they will choose incorrectly, but if the rules are set by HHS, it will be smooth sailing? You must hate common sense.

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


What about the family of the adult waiting for a lung?


Jun 4, 2013, 9:57 PM [ in reply to The thing is, the choice should be between her, her family, ]

Maybe they should fight it out to the death. Loser donates.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Such negative connotations.


Jun 4, 2013, 4:30 PM [ in reply to So, its death panels then.*** ]

Why can't we call em life panels? Everyone doesn't die, do they?

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

your glass is half full...of what i have no idea! #rodney***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:35 PM



badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


No, more like life panels


Jun 4, 2013, 4:42 PM [ in reply to So, its death panels then.*** ]

Organ transplantation is complex and politicians should not be involved. I am not a fan of the current administration or the current head of HHS but I think it is right that she doesn’t get involved.
There are a lot of statistics (survivability both immediate and long-term) in play. Organs suitable for transplant are obviously scarce (else there wouldn’t be a waiting list). Meetings happen in hospitals all the time where doctors determine the best candidates for transplant. There are many criteria recipients must face / pass in order to be considered to receive an organ.
My wife is a radiologist and attends a meeting every Thursday morning where surgeons, radiologists, interventional radiologists, internal medicine docs, pathologists, and other specialties are represented and they review pending cases regarding those waiting for transplants. This is one hospital (granted a very large hospital). This happens at other hospitals and all of these must be coordinated. The docs owe it to the patients and the donors (family of the donors) to make sure only the best suited people get the organs.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

11 posts in 10 years?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:45 PM

What other transplant threads have you been involved in?

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

He's pacing himself


Jun 4, 2013, 4:46 PM

Good post though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 11 posts in 10 years?


Jun 4, 2013, 4:53 PM [ in reply to 11 posts in 10 years? ]

Does it matter? I have lurked for years on this board and the Jounge. I don't usually post because really don't care to post. I just thought I could shed some light on the topic. Needless to say, it is complex.
If everyone would like, I can start posting all the time. I probably not as annoying as most and slightly less idiotic than others.
Seriously though, my wife is an actual radiologist (she works at Barnes-Jewish in STL) and sits through transplant meetings every Thursday morning for the last two years. I have learned a lot about transplants and transplant protocol.
Keep hitting F5.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I like this one.^^***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:55 PM



badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Still hitting F5 and nothing***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:58 PM [ in reply to Re: 11 posts in 10 years? ]



flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

try hitting F and 5 separately?


Jun 4, 2013, 5:18 PM

that should werk

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Re: 11 posts in 10 years?


Jun 4, 2013, 5:08 PM [ in reply to Re: 11 posts in 10 years? ]

If you've lurked enough, then you should know that my post was in jest.


I already called "life panels" earlier in the thread. But that was in jest, as well.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Oh I know


Jun 4, 2013, 5:15 PM

I was just explaining myself for the others who can't think for themselves (I have no clue who I could be talking about).
You did make me feel bad though. I didn't realize I have been on here for almost ten years and only have 14 posts to show for it. I have to step my game up. Here is for 15 posts over the next ten years.
Maybe I should start worrying about my pulse. I am going to lie awake at night hoping it doesn't go down. If I can keep my blood pressure high enough worrying, I can get me one of them fancy new kidneys everyone is trying to get. I doubt my wife could or would help me with that though.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Do they still sell 'em on ebay?***


Jun 4, 2013, 5:18 PM



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

right, but what if it's a really stupid, lazy adult who


Jun 4, 2013, 4:29 PM [ in reply to Or better yet ]

needs a lung because he was a lifelong smoker vs. a young girl with a brain and lots of potential? i'd say screw the old guy, let's roll the dice on the one that might make a difference.

badge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

FAT TAX NOW!


I would agree but, get in line.***


Jun 4, 2013, 4:31 PM



2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Let's say that they waive.


Jun 4, 2013, 4:24 PM

Does she go to the front of the line? There's 40 on the list.

2009_nascar_champ.gif flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Is this gonna be like Terri Schiavo?


Jun 4, 2013, 6:19 PM

Pro-lifers will get all hot and bothered about this specific case without actually understanding the larger picture and quickly forgetting their supposedly deep seated opinion once they see something shiny?

badge-donor-05yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


They just like to type death panel


Jun 4, 2013, 6:21 PM

It makes them think of Sarah Palin, and when they think of Sarah Palin, they get a tingle up and down their spine.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Yes.***


Jun 4, 2013, 7:11 PM [ in reply to Is this gonna be like Terri Schiavo? ]



2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


They'll move on once the opinion makers move on


Jun 4, 2013, 9:16 PM [ in reply to Is this gonna be like Terri Schiavo? ]

(i.e. tv/blogs/radio) They'll parrot whatever dribble gets fed to them to stay angry. Then move on to something else. Never really knowing or caring about any principle other than "stay angry!"

Both sides do it, and it's weird how easily and frequently it happens.

flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

I feel bad for the kid.


Jun 4, 2013, 7:37 PM

Everyone involved feels bad for the kid, no doubt. But this is a classic case of the application of scarce (in the very truest sense of the word) resources. This ins't a "It'll cost too much" decision, which I truly understand folks objections to.

This is a case where medical professionals who have examined the statistics have made a determination that a viable adult lung has a considerably better chance of saving the life of an adult than a child. And while that, of course, will lead to sad situations such as these I'd argue that focusing on any single instance and asking for rules to be changed (at the cost of another potential life saved) is a poor, at best, way to make these decisions.

2024 orange level memberbadge-donor-20yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up


Yes.***


Jun 4, 2013, 10:22 PM



2024 purple level memberbadge-donor-10yr.jpg flag link military_tech thumb_downthumb_up

Falsehood flies, and truth comes limping after it, so that when men come to be undeceived, it is too late; the jest is over, and the tale hath had its effect: like a man, who hath thought of a good repartee when the discourse is changed, or the company parted; or like a physician, who hath found out an infallible medicine, after the patient is dead.
- Jonathan Swift


Replies: 54
| visibility 1
Archives - General Boards Archive
add New Topic